Author: admin

  • Mr Major’s Speech to the Young Deaf Achievers Awards – 12 December 1990

    The text of Mr Major’s speech to the British Telecom Young Deaf Achievers Award, held at the Cafe Royal in London on the 12th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Ladies and Gentlemen:

    Chairman, thank you very much indeed. I must let you into a secret that not many people are aware of – indeed, if they were, I suppose in a curious way it would not be a secret! But we do have in the House of Commons something of a trade union of former Ministers for the Disabled. It is a very discreet, very select, rather enjoyable trade union but in that trade union the Father of the Chapel, irrespective of anything to do with politics, is undoubtedly Jack Ashley and it is a very great privilege for me to follow him today and to thank him publicly for the extraordinary amount of work he has done not just for people who are disabled through deafness but for people who are disabled in a whole range of ways. He has done more in my judgement [Applause]. Well there you are, I need not say it because you know, so it does not need saying!

    Jack was kind enough to say that minutes were precious and to thank me for coming. If I may say so, I think perhaps I should thank him for inviting me because the reason I was keen to come today is because there are many of us here who are very fortunate in that we have to face no disability in the normal journey through life that all of us have; but those who do need a very special courage to face that – not just the courage to meet the challenges, but the ordinary everyday courage to actually decide to take on those challenges in the first place, perhaps to go to a workplace or a university or to enter into a sport or to enter into the normal social contact that most people accept, anticipate and enjoy with no difficulty whatsoever.

    Faced with a disability, whether it be deafness or perhaps some other disability or perhaps a myriad series of disabilities which alas is so often the case, it does take a very remarkable kind of personal courage to enter into that commitment into society and the young people that I had the privilege of meeting just before lunch today were people who have not only had the courage to enter into society in that particular fashion but have achieved very remarkable things as a result of having done so and for me, it is a very great privilege today to have had the opportunity of meeting them. A privilege but not a surprise, for having been Minister for the Disabled, albeit for the all too short time of just a year, I learned during that period across a whole range of disability, with what enormous courage so many people in this country face hurdles that many of us cannot imagine and perhaps would not be able to cope with if we were able to imagine them. For we ought not to pretend, as we see these young people receiving their well-deserved awards in a few moments, that what they have achieved has been easy or comfortable or without some difficulties, for it has not been and indeed, in many ways it simply could not have been.

    Many of us might think what today’s finalists have done was almost impossible but I think if you do think that, that shows the failure of our imagination and not theirs, for the young people who receive these awards did realise what could be done, put themselves to do it and have succeeded in my judgement in rather spectacular fashion.

    One of the reasons I regard this as an important occasion is to touch upon something that Iain Vallance said. In many ways, these young people offer a very considerable beacon of hope to other people who are disabled as to what they can achieve in their own lives and they have precisely the same right to achieve what they can in their lives that everybody else has and we have an obligation to assist them to do it, whether or not they be disabled, and to ensure that they can get the maximum possible out of their lives provided that they will put into it – as those we meet today and hundreds of thousands of others do – the effort and courage that is necessary to deal with the difficulties they often face.

    I hope that those people who perhaps still have in their minds some form of prejudice or difficulty because somebody has one form of disability will realise that one form of disability does not disable people from the normal functions of life, the normal responsibilities of life, the normal duties of life and the normal pleasures that the rest of us are able to enjoy.

    If there is one thing that has been happening remarkably in the last twenty years or so, but which still has further in my judgement to go, it is to open up the opportunities for people who are disabled that those who are not disabled have over the years come to take for granted and I hope that that is something we will all be able to take a part in doing in the years ahead.

    The people who are disabled know from their own experience the will power that is necessary to achieve what they have achieved and I think in terms of will power and courage, if there are two attributes that the young people you will meet shortly have demonstrated to a very remarkable extent it is those. I hope that we will continue to encourage them and many others to achieve precisely the same things in the future.

    I would, if I may, therefore like to thank most warmly both [indistinct] and Iain Vallance and British Telecom for sponsoring this event, for the enormous amount that they have done, are doing and I very much hope will continue to do in the future and perhaps I should also mention just as an example, the contribution that British Telecom has made to the Royal National Institute for the Deaf telephone exchange for the deaf, which it has been jointly funding with the Government. This does allow deaf people to telephone, hearing people by providing an operator with whom deaf people can communicate through text; the operator then passes on their message. British Telecom announced a grant of 4 million pounds this year to allow this service to continue and I would like publicly to express my thanks to Iain Vallance for that very generous and … [Applause].

    I think, if I may presume to speak upon behalf of the award winners today and perhaps also a little wider on behalf of disabled people – people who have disabilities I might more accurately say – elsewhere in the community, there are, I think, some people whom they would wish to thank and whom I might thank on their behalf and that is their parents and friends who will have encouraged them and helped them throughout the vast majority – in the case of their parents, throughout all their lives – to deal with their disabilities and to make the most of their opportunities. On behalf of disabled people, I would like to extend those thanks most warmly for I think they are thanks well deserved by those who offer so much to people who have been treated so harshly in so many instances.

    I think, if I may say so, Chairman, that the principal purpose of today’s meeting is to honour those young people who have won in a very in a very remarkable fashion these awards which are so difficult to obtain and so I will say no more except to say that in a few moments I hope you will give a very warm welcome indeed to a number of very remarkable young people who have achieved what few could have achieved and which all of us may look at with a certain degree of pride that young people in our country can do such things despite the handicaps that they face. [Applause].

  • PMQT Written Answers – 11 December 1990

    The text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 11th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Gulf Crisis

    Mr. Dalyell : To ask the Prime Minister whether any disciplinary action is proposed against Brigadier Patrick Cordingley in respect of public statements about potential casualties in the event of resort to a military option in the Gulf.

    The Prime Minister : No.

     

    Iraq (Supergun)

    Mr. Caborn : To ask the Prime Minister which Government Departments were consulted about the orders for Iraq placed in 1988 by Walter Somers and Forgemasters.

    The Prime Minister : In the case of Walter Somers, the Department of Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Defence were involved. For the licence application made by Sheffield Forgemasters only DTI was involved.

     

    Nature Conservation

    Mr. Dalyell : To ask the Prime Minister if he will make a statement on the representations he has had from staff of the Nature Conservancy Council in Peterborough and Huntingdon about the break-up of the Nature Conservancy Council.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 10 December 1990] : In my capacity as the Member for Huntingdon, I received several letters and other representations from constituents employed by the Nature Conservancy Council about the planned reorganisation of the council. I have responded to those representations.

     

    Science Policy

    Dr. Bray : To ask the Prime Minister if he intends to take the overall responsibility for science policy; if he proposes to chair the Advisory Council on Science and Technology and the Cabinet Committee on Science and Technology; and what arrangements he proposes to make for overall ministerial responsibility for science policy.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 10 December 1990] : My intention is to continue the arrangements set out in the White Paper, “Civil Research and Development” (CM 185) of July 1987. In particular there will be collective ministerial consideration, under my chairmanship, of science and technology policy and priorities and the provision of independent advice from the Advisory Council on Science and Technology (ACOST), chaired by Sir Robin Nicholson FRS.

  • PMQT – 11 December 1990

    The text of Prime Minister’s Question Time from 11th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Gulf Crisis

    Q1. Mr. Dalyell : To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to the answer of the right hon. Member for Finchley (Mrs. Thatcher) of 13 November, Official Report, column 446, if he will specify those figures which he possesses relating to oil stocks, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide which differ from those given by King Hussein, showing in each case the comparable figures and the source for those which he uses.

    The Prime Minister (Mr. John Major) : No, Sir. The calculations rest on assumptions about the consequences of a conflict in the Gulf which, by their nature, are not quantifiable. The best way to avoid any adverse consequences is for Saddam Hussein to comply with the United Nations resolutions in full.

    Mr. Dalyell : Is not the spine-chilling truth that no mining engineer, no scientist and no politician knows for certain what will occur if 300 deep-mined oil wells are detonated? In those circumstances, might not the fires rage for months, if not years, in a fashion quite outside human experience? In view of that, should not the damage to the planet, let alone the human slaughter and the Arab ecological disaster, rule out any talk of a military option?

    The Prime Minister : As the hon. Gentleman says, no one can be absolutely and precisely certain about the outcome. In so far as it is possible to make an assessment, we see no reason to agree with any of the views put forward thus far as to what the outcome might be.

    Dr. Michael Clark : Is my right hon. Friend aware that last week I visited the Council for Higher Education in Amman, where the calculations were carried out for King Hussein? Does my right hon. Friend agree that the horrors of war, whether human or environmental, should be made abundantly plain to Saddam Hussein in particular?

    The Prime Minister : I entirely agree with my hon. Friend about that, but, on the assumptions that King Hussein used, we believe that some of the difficulties to which he referred would not be precisely as described.

    Mr. Livingstone : Will the Prime Minister take time today to read the recently published report of the Association of London Authorities– [Interruption.]

    Mr. Speaker : Order. I call Mr. Butcher.

    Mr. Butcher : While my right hon. Friend is considering the risk of an ecological disaster from airborne pollutants in the middle east, will he bear in mind that there is a risk from Saddam Hussein himself? He has already used chemical weapons, he has developed illegal biological weapons, and he may soon possess nuclear weapons. Does my right hon. Friend agree that the best way to safeguard the security of Iraq’s neighbours is for the United Nations to ensure that Saddam Hussein does not keep one piece of Kuwaiti territory that he has gained by armed aggression?

    The Prime Minister : The risk to which my hon. Friend refers is there. It is for that reason that there is a most remarkable degree of international consensus that the Security Council resolutions must be met in full.

     

    Engagements

    Q2. Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 11 December.

    The Prime Minister : This morning, I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall today be having further meetings. This evening I hope to have an audience of Her Majesty the Queen.

    Mr. Brown : In the course of his busy day, will the Prime Minister consider selling to me any of his personal possessions–one of his houses would be very nice–at 60 per cent. of the true market value? If he is not willing to do that with his personal possessions, why is he willing to do it with the nation’s?

    The Prime Minister : I have only one house, and I propose to stay there and keep it.

    Mr. Gregory : Does my right hon. Friend agree that the denationalisation of the electricity industry has been a great success and, furthermore, will ensure that Britain develops as a real share-owning and property-owning democracy?

    The Prime Minister : I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. The offer has been a huge success–clearly the most successful ever–and oversubscribed 10 times. It shows clearly that people are prepared and willing to become share owners in a share-owning democracy.

    Mr. Kinnock : Will the right hon. Gentleman confirm that, as a result of the Government’s underpricing of electricity shares, the British taxpayer stands to lose £3 billion or more?

    The Prime Minister : The right hon. Gentleman has said something like that about each privatisation. Every privatisation has been a success. Is the right hon. Gentleman proposing to renationalise?

    Hon. Members : Answer!

    Mr. Kinnock : I will, as Prime Minister after the next general election–do not worry about that. [Interruption.]

    Mr. Speaker : Order. How can the Leader of the Opposition answer with such shouting going on?

    Mr. Kinnock : Selling public assets for 40 per cent. less than they are worth is, by anyone’s judgment, a national scandal. Today, with the electricity sale, the British people are being subjected to a national scandal and a great swindle by their own Government. Any Government who inflict that on their own people are guilty of infamous incompetence or great dishonesty, or both.

    The Prime Minister : I reject absolutely the right hon. Gentleman’s charge, and I repeat the question–will he renationalise?

    Mr. Kinnock : Will the Prime Minister provide me and the British people with a justification for selling off a national asset for £3 billion less than it is worth and, in the course of that, showing the dishonesty of the Government and the willingness of the Government to swindle their own people?

    The Prime Minister : There are two points in answer to the right hon. Gentleman. First, the share price absolutely reflects the aim of getting value for the taxpayer. Secondly, in view of what the right hon. Gentleman has said, what on earth was the hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull, East (Mr. Prescott) saying when he made the prediction that we would not succeed in privatising the electricity industry?

    Sir Fergus Montgomery : Is my right hon. Friend aware of the deep disappointment in the north-west that Manchester is not the venue for the Olympic games in 1996? Will he bear in mind that yesterday Manchester launched its bid to be the venue in the year 2000? As I expect that my right hon. Friend will still be Prime Minister at that time, may I have an assurance from him that the Government will totally support the British bid for the Olympics in 10 years’ time?

    The Prime Minister : Not only that–I look forward to attending them.

     

    Q4. Mr. Archer : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 11 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the right hon. and learned Gentleman to the answer that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Archer : Reverting to the loss to the Exchequer from the mismanagement in marketing electricity shares, when 3,500 hospital beds are out of commission because of underfunding in the health service, has the right hon. Gentleman reflected that if a local council had made a similar pig’s ear of its affairs councillors would face personal surcharges? What sanction does he suggest for incompetence among Ministers?

    The Prime Minister : In my view, an offer that is oversubscribed 10 times is a success and not a pig’s ear.

     

    Q5. Mr. John Marshall : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 11 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the answer that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Marshall : Is my right hon. Friend aware that the chairman of the Haemophilia Society is one of my constituents? Has my right hon. Friend read the Adjournment debate that I initiated on 15 October, and when does he expect to be in a position to act on this deep human tragedy?

    The Prime Minister : My hon. Friend the Member for Staffordshire, South (Mr. Cormack) raised this problem the other day. I can now tell the House that the Government have been examining this matter and have been able to agree in principle to proposals been put forward by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Provided that the proposals are formally approved by individual plaintiffs–and, in the case of minors, by the courts–they should provide a basis for bringing the matter to an agreement successfully and soon. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health will inform the House of the details. I am sure that hon. Members of all parties will welcome this development, as I do.

     

    Q6. Mr. Matthew Taylor : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 11 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Taylor : When the Prime Minister was elected leader of the Conservative party, the House was aware that during his campaign he had referred to the difficulties facing teachers, and especially their low morale. As he is his own man, what does he intend to do to change policy and to increase morale among teachers?

    The Prime Minister : I share the hon. Gentleman’s view that morale in the teaching profession is immensely important. It depends on a whole range of factors–not only salaries, but on job opportunities, the quality and nature of education, and the opportunities for advancement within the profession. My right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science is examining all these matters.

     

    Q7. Mr. Paice : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 11 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the answer that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Paice : Referring back to the earlier questions about electricity privatisation, is not it clear that the lesson from the many privatisation issues in the past few years is that what the public really want when they refer to “public ownership” are share certificates, property deeds and pensions with their own personal names on them? Does my right hon. Friend agree that that is true public ownership and that the accumulation of personal wealth which it creates will bode well for the economic future of this country?

    The Prime Minister : I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. It is also a matter of some importance that the sale of the 12 discos will raise £8 billion.

    Mr. Spearing : Has the Prime Minister seen the document sent to the President of the European Council on Friday by President Mitterrand and Chancellor Kohl? Does he agree that it contains proposals for adding security, citizenship and foreign affairs to the competence of the European Communities, together with co-legislation of the Parliament and majority voting on all but a few issues? Does he further agree that that creates even more centralism than exists at the moment, thus increasing the democratic deficit? As the documents were placed in the Library after the House had debated these matters last Thursday, will the right hon. Gentleman tell his colleagues in Rome next week that such matters and the way in which the President can introduce business at such late notice is unacceptable and only increases the democratic deficit?

    The Prime Minister : I share the underlying concern that the hon. Gentleman has raised about the shortness of notice in such matters. In another sphere, I have raised this issue at ECOFIN on a number of occasions. Decisions taken in the Community should be preceded by proper examination, proper costings and proper consideration. I shall certainly make that point.

     

    Environment

    Q8. Mr. Hunter : To ask the Prime Minister if he will make a further statement on the United Kingdom’s contribution to international co- operation on environmental issues.

    The Prime Minister : The United Kingdom plays an active part in the work of many international bodies dealing with environmental issues. We are fully involved in the preparations for the 1992 United Nations conference on the environment and development in Brazil, which includes negotiations on a framework convention on climate change and on biological diversity.

    Mr. Hunter : Although I welcome such international co-operation and the Government’s part in it, will my right hon. Friend be on his guard against wasteful duplication and abuse of taxpayers’ money? In that context, will he look at the work of the European Environmental Statistics Office, the European Environmental Agency, the European Environmental Monitoring and Information System and the European Environmental CORINE Programme? International co-operation is desirable, but the duplication of bureaucracy in the EEC is not.

    The Prime Minister : Environmental care is a matter of great importance to the Government, but my hon. Friend is surely right to draw attention to the dangers of duplicated expenditure. I shall bear in mind what he says.

    Mr. Wigley : If, as is widely reported in the European newspapers, Chancellor Kohl and other leaders are likely to ask at the forthcoming conference in Rome for a level of elected regional government to be developed within Europe as a counterbalance to centralisation, will the Prime Minister give an undertaking not to rule out the idea out of hand?

    The Prime Minister : That is a matter which may conceivably be raised at the weekend. Certainly, I have had no notice that it will be raised. The matter will need to be carefully examined.

    Mr. Speaker : Mr. James Pawsey. Mr. Pawsey?

    Several Hon. Members rose–

    Mr. Speaker : Mr. Harry Ewing.

    Mr. Harry Ewing : I am grateful both to you, Mr. Speaker, and to the hon. Member for Rugby and Kenilworth (Mr. Pawsey).

    May I take the Prime Minister back to his first answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Linlithgow (Mr. Dalyell) when the right hon. Gentleman talked about the military option in the Gulf? Do the Government have any contingency plans to reintroduce conscription and national service to sustain the military option in the Gulf?

    Mr. Dickens : On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. Under the conventions of the House, should not any question that you call be related to question 8?

    Mr. Speaker : The hon. Gentleman is always so helpful. However I called question 9. I think that technically the hon. Gentleman may be right but I turned a blind eye to that in view of the absence of the hon. Member for Rugby and Kenilworth (Mr. Pawsey).

    The Prime Minister : I understand the important question that the hon. Gentleman asked about the Gulf which as he knows, is a matter that we debate frequently in the House.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 10 December 1990

    The text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 10th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Downing Street (Gates)

    Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Prime Minister if he has any plans to dismantle the gates at the end of Downing Street.

    The Prime Minister : I have nothing further to add to the reply that I gave to the hon. Member for Walsall, North (Mr. Winnick) on 6 December at column 166.

     

    Fiscal and Environmental Policy

    Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Prime Minister if he will now take steps to achieve the integration of fiscal and environmental policy.

    The Prime Minister : We already seek to ensure that all the environmental implications of policy decisions under discussion are considered before conclusions are reached. My right hon. Friend has nominated the Minister of State, Treasury the Minister responsible for considering the environmental implications of policies.

     

    Ministerial Committee on the Environment

    Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Prime Minister how he intends to ensure parliamentary accountability of the new ministerial committee on the environment.

    The Prime Minister : Cabinet Committees are internal mechanisms for co-ordinating policy within Government. They do not affect ministerial accountability to Parliament.

     

    Parliamentary Sitting Times

    Ms. Harman : To ask the Prime Minister if he will establish a review of the hours at which the House sits and the dates of the summer recess.

    The Prime Minister : I have nothing to add to the reply I gave my hon. Friend the Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Sir R. McCrindle) on 6 December at column 452.

     

    Nature Conservation

    Mr. Dalyell : To ask the Prime Minister which Minister is responsible for answering for the actions of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee; and if he will publish a table showing the resource allocations to England, Scotland and Wales and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee for 1991-92 as compared with the recommendations in the Inbucon report.

    The Prime Minister : The Joint Nature Conservation Committee is a committee of all three country councils each of which is answerable to its own territorial Secretary of State for all its functions, including those exercised through the JNCC. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment would normally expect to take the lead in answering any questions about the committee.

    The predecessor of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment announced on 9 November that the grant in aid to the Nature Conservancy Council for England (NCCE) in 1991-92 had been set provisionally at £32.411 million. Announcements about the grant in aid to be provided to the new agencies in Scotland and Wales will be made shortly by my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and for Wales respectively.

    The Inbucon report was commissioned by the Nature Conservancy Council to assist it in preparing its proposed forward plans. It was made available on request by the council in October. The figures contained in the report are therefore already available for examination.

     

    Hospitals (Foreign Use)

    Mr. Nellist : To ask the Prime Minister how many unused or disused civilian or military hospitals in the United Kingdom are owned or run by foreign Governments or armies; and if he will make a statement.

    The Prime Minister : Details of civilian hospitals owned or run by foreign Governments are not available.

    United States forces have contingency hospitals at RAF Chessington, RAF Little Rissington, RAF Nocton Hall and RAF Bicester. These are laid out as hospitals, but supplies and staff have to be brought in to activate them at a time of crisis.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 7 December 1990

    The text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 7th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    The Gulf

    Mr. Wray : To ask the Prime Minister what urgent steps he has taken in order to assess the (a) economic, (b) financial and (c) humane costs of an armed conflict of Arab, British and American troops with Iraq; and what information Her Majesty’s Government are gathering about the economic, social and political impact of such conflict upon non-oil producer countries in the third world and those in the middle east in particular.

    The Prime Minister : We are doing everything in our power to contribute to a peaceful solution to the Gulf crisis based on the full implementation of the resolutions adopted by the United Nations Security Council. It is not possible to make exact predictions of the effects of hostilities in the manner suggested, should it be necessary to use force to eject Saddam Hussein.

     

    Latin America

    Mr. Wray : To ask the Prime Minister what support her Majesty’s Government are giving to the call of Finance and Economy Ministers of Latin America to start negotiations with the European Community for a free trade accord.

    The Prime Minister : No formal request for this purpose has been received by the Community. If one were, it would be carefully considered. The Government would play a full part in that process.

     

    Nuclear Test Veterans

    Mr. Vaz : To ask the Prime Minister how many representations he has received concerning compensation for nuclear test veterans.

    The Prime Minister : I have not, as far as I am aware, received any representations from nuclear test veterans. The Ministry of Defence has, however, received about 120 claims from individuals seeking compensation for damage to health allegedly due to participation in the United Kingdom’s nuclear weapon test programme. In addition, a number of representations have been made by test veterans’ organisations concerning compensation for their members.

     

    India

    Mr. Vaz : To ask the Prime Minister if he has any plans to visit India.

    The Prime Minister : I have no plans at present to visit India.

     

    Mr. John Hall

    Mr. Vaz : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his answer on 4 December concerning the case of Mr. John Hall, Official Report, column 172 if he will agree to meet Mr. Hall to discuss compensation.

    The Prime Minister : I understand that Mr. Hall is in receipt of a war pension. He has made no claim for compensation other than this. Should Mr. Hall pursue a claim for compensation, Government officials would be happy to discuss the matter with him.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 6 December 1990

    The text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 6th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    The Gulf (Ecological Consequences)

    Q9. Mr. Tam Dalyell : To ask the Prime Minister what assessment has been made of the ecological consequences of a military option in the Gulf.

    The Prime Minister : On any realistic estimate, the main effect would be to increase annual world CO emissions by a small amount. Any environmental damage is undesirable, but the international community believes that the issues at stake are overriding. The way to avoid any of the consequences to which the hon. Member draws attention is for Saddam Hussein to comply with the resolutions of the United Nations and to withdraw from Kuwait.

    Staff

    Mr. Winnick : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list the names, duties and grading of those now employed in his office.

    The Prime Minister : The senior staff currently employed in my office and paid from public funds are :

    Name |Grade |Position
    ——————————————————————————————————–
    Mr. A. Turnbull |Grade 2 |Principal Private Secretary
    Mr. C. D. Powell |Grade 3 |Private Secretary-Overseas Affairs
    Mr. D. C. B. Morris |Grade 5 |Private Secretary-Parliamentary Affairs
    Mr. B. Potter |Grade 5 |Private Secretary-Economic Affairs
    Miss C. A. Slocock |Grade 7 |Private Secretary-Home Affairs
    Mr. J. R. Catford |Grade 5 |Secretary for Appointments
    Mr. A. T. O’Donnell |Grade 3 |Chief Press Secretary
    Mr. T. J. Perks |Grade 5 |Deputy Chief Press Secretary
    Mr. C. Fountain |Grade 7 |Security Co-ordinator
    Mrs. S. Hogg |Grade 1A |Head of Policy Unit
    Mr. J. Mills |Grade 5 |Policy Adviser
    Miss C. Sinclair |Grade 5 |Policy Adviser
    In addition, there are currently 56 employed on administrative and support duties. I am considering further appointments to my policy unit.

    Downing Street (Gates)

    Mr. Winnick : To ask the Prime Minister if he has any plans to remove the gates to the entrance to Downing Street.

    The Prime Minister : No.

    Ministerial Responsibilities

    Mr. Maxwell-Hyslop : To ask the Prime Minister when the Cabinet Office will issue an up-to-date edition of the document entitled “List of Ministerial Responsibilities.”

    The Prime Minister : An up-to-date edition will be deposited in the Library as soon as possible after ministerial responsibilities in Departments have been determined.

    Department of Energy

    Mr. Arbuthnot : To ask the Prime Minister whether it is his intention to retain the Department of Energy as a separate Department.

    The Prime Minister : My present expectation is that work in the energy area will justify the retention of a separate department at least until the end of this Parliament.

  • PMQT – 6 December 1990

    The text of Prime Minister’s Question Time from 6th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Engagements

    Q1. Ms. Quin : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 6 December.

    The Prime Minister (Mr. John Major) : This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.

    Ms. Quin : Does the Prime Minister recall that only two days ago he appealed to his party to close ranks? Can he explain why so many of his colleagues refused to support him in the poll tax debate last night? Can he also explain why the British people, many of whom have suffered hardship as a result of this tax, should be expected to have any confidence in the Conservative party, when it is now clear that Tory Members who originally voted to impose the poll tax on us clearly did not believe in it all along?

    The Prime Minister : The hon. Lady is slightly mistaken. A large number of my ministerial and Back-Bench colleagues were abroad unpaired yesterday, and my right hon. Friend the Chief Whip saw no need to bring them back, because we are united.

    Mr. Holt : Is my right hon. Friend aware that it has not gone unnoticed on Teesside and in the north-east that, on Tuesday night, he supported the Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority Bill in the Lobby, and that the Leader of the Opposition did not oppose it? My right hon. Friend will be most welcome throughout the north-east when he makes his frequent visits–unlike the Leader of the Opposition, who has occasionally dropped in on the Durham miners’ gala and then scarpered back to the south.

    The Prime Minister : I am grateful to my hon. Friend. I look forward to visiting Langbaurgh and the north-east on many occasions.

    Mr. Kinnock : When he knows what he knows, why does the Prime Minister refuse to abolish the poll tax now?

    The Prime Minister : Unlike the right hon. Gentleman and his party– who have, on the latest count, changed their policy on this matter on 52 occasions–we are conducting a comprehensive review to determine how best to deal with it.

    Mr. Kinnock : Will the Prime Minister confirm for the British people that the poll tax will still be in place at the time of the next general election?

    The Prime Minister : My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment made it perfectly clear yesterday that we were undertaking a fundamental review, and a fundamental review is what we shall undertake. We shall see how long that will take. I think that the country will notice that, although he professes to oppose the system, the right hon. Gentleman will make no constructive moves towards a constructive dialogue to correct it.

    Mr. Kinnock : When the right hon. Gentleman’s proposal last night did not even convince his hon. Friends, how does he seriously expect it to convince anybody else? Will he now answer the question? Will he confirm that the poll tax will still be in place at the next general election–yes or no?

    The Prime Minister : The right hon. Gentleman might confirm that he has made it clear that under his plans the time scale for change may be considerable.

    Mr. Fishburn : Will my right hon. Friend win the hearts of Londoners today by endorsing the proposals for leasehold reform put forward last week by the Lord Chancellor? Does he accept that the draft Bill for commonhold will allow London flat dwellers to own their flats on freehold for the first time, thereby ending the injustices of leasehold that make so many London flat dwellers into second-class home owners?

    The Prime Minister : As my hon. Friend will know, over the past 10 years we have done more to increase owner-occupation, with the personal security that that offers, than any previous Government. It is noticeable that that is not the policy of the Labour party.

    Mr. Ashdown : Does the Prime Minister realise that we welcome the proposal made last night for discussions with Opposition parties on a replacement for the poll tax? My party will contribute constructively to those discussions. We shall not play parliamentary games while millions out there are suffering from the effects of this unjust tax. In that context, may I ask the right hon. Gentleman to remember the promise that he made in his 1974 election address, in which he said that he would abolish the rates

    Mr. Speaker : Order. I do not think that we need visual aids.

    Mr. Ashdown : –in which he said that he would abolish the rates–

    Mr. Speaker : Order. The right hon. Gentleman can make his point without the visual signs.

    Mr. Ashdown : He said that he would abolish the rates and replace them with a tax related to the ability to pay. Does he still agree with that and does he realise that the only tax properly related to ability to pay is a local income tax?

    The Prime Minister : On the last point, the right hon. Gentleman knows that we are considering local taxation at the moment. On the first point, I share what I think is implicit in what the right hon. Gentleman said, which is that the House of Commons need not necessarily be a perpetual cockpit of confrontation. I regret very much that Labour Members, despite all that they said, have no intention of helping to determine common principles for the role of local government. If they do not wish to do so, that is a matter for them, but others will.

    Mr. Speaker : Mr. Michael Lord. [Hon. Members :– “Who?”] Order.

    Mr. Lord : As our new Prime Minister will have considerably fewer problems to deal with on taking over his appointment, may I urge him to bring to the top of the list the problem of haemophiliacs who have been infected with the AIDS virus through no fault of their own? He would earn the undying gratitude of the victims, their families and the House if he could take steps to bring about an out-of-court settlement as quickly as possible.

    The Prime Minister : As my hon. Friend knows, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health has made it clear that we are spending a considerable amount of money to deal with that problem, which we shall continually keep under review.

     

    Q2. Mr. Hinchliffe : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 6 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Hinchliffe : Is the Prime Minister aware that in the past 12 months a baby has been abducted from a hospital in London, an 11-year-old girl has been raped at a hospital in Surrey, a 77-year-old woman has been indecently assaulted at a hospital in Leeds and last week two doctors were murdered at a hospital in Wakefield? As the Government are committed to spending about £200 million on allowing hospitals to opt out, but a mere £20,000 on hospital security, does the Prime Minister feel that he has his priorities right?

    The Prime Minister : The hon. Gentleman should bear it in mind that the direct management of hospitals lies with health authorities and, in the case of national health service trusts, with the management of those trusts in due course. I am sure that they will take note of what the hon. Gentleman says.

    Mr. Cormack : Is my right hon. Friend aware that there would be almost universal delight and gratitude if, before Christmas, the problem of the haemophilia AIDS victims were solved by adequate compensation being paid without liability being admitted?

    The Prime Minister : As my hon. Friend knows, we have already made a payment into the Macfarlane Trust. I understand the sensitive nature of the matter, but I have nothing further to add today.

     

    Q3. Mr. Mullin : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 6 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Mullin : Is the Prime Minister aware that of the 181 children who left Pennywell comprehensive school in my constituency earlier this year, only 10 found some form of employment, 32 went on to higher education, and of the remaining 150 or so, half went on to Government training schemes, which will lead to the dole, and the other half went directly on to the dole? What hope can he offer the children of Sunderland that life in John Major’s Britain will be any different from life in Margaret Thatcher’s Britain?

    The Prime Minister : As the hon. Gentleman knows, there have been considerable improvements in every aspect of life in the past 10 years, and that will continue. On the specific point that he made, a larger percentage of our youngsters now go on to further education than ever before, a higher percentage of our population is in work than ever before and there is a higher level of opportunities and training than ever before. That bodes well for the young people of Sunderland and indeed for young people everywhere.

    Mr. Riddick : Will my right hon. Friend comment on the fact that many local education authorities, including mine of Kirklees, are holding back far more of their education budgets for central administration than was originally intended by the Government? As the Government have announced that they intend to carry out a full review of the structure of local government, does he think that we should consider taking the control of education out of the hands of local education authorities and giving it to schools?

    The Prime Minister : I have considerable sympathy with that point of view, not least because of the enormous success of local management of schools. I hope that education authorities will release as much money as possible to go directly into the classroom.

     

    Q4. Mr. Chris Smith : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 6 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Smith : Will the Prime Minister tell us whether, as a result of the frantic trawling for options and ideas that is under way in the Department of the Environment, there will be any reduction whatsoever in the poll tax bills that people will receive in April, or will the amounts be precisely the same as they were always going to be?

    The Prime Minister : As for trawling for options, I remind the hon. Gentleman that his party has had 52 changes of mind on local government. That is not so much a U-turn as a merry-go-round.

    Mr. Nicholas Winterton : Does my right hon. Friend accept that manufacturing industry is the only genuine source of non-inflationary growth and that the continuing use of high interest rates is damaging to investment and to competitiveness? Will my right hon. Friend look again at an alternative industrial manufacturing strategy?

    The Prime Minister : As my hon. Friend knows, the central core of economic policy is to bear down on inflation. As it reduces–and I expect that it will reduce, which is the general view of external commentators as well- -the options may exist for a reduction in interest rates. I can give no indication of when that may be.

     

    Q5. Mr. Andrew F. Bennett : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday 6 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Bennett : Does the Prime Minister agree that given that two of the Polaris submarines are no longer seaworthy and that the other two were on the Clyde earlier this week, he is the first Prime Minister for 20 years not to have had a nuclear deterrent at his fingertips? Does he further agree that that did not cause him or the country any problems? Will he now agree that, rather than trying to patch up the remaining Polaris submarines, he should abandon the whole programme and give a clear lead to the non-proliferation talks in January that we want to have a non-nuclear world?

    The Prime Minister : Our nuclear capacity remains a deterrent and remains an important part of our defence.

    Sir Robert McCrindle : As my former area Whip–which until now has, no doubt, been his greatest claim to distinction–will my right hon. Friend comment on the possibility of some change being brought to the hours that the House works? Will he tell me why, having had that matter raised on many occasions in the 20 years in which I have been in the House, I remain sceptical? What can my right hon. Friend do to reassure me?

    The Prime Minister : I have fond memories of being my hon. Friend’s Whip some years ago. The hours of work in the House are essentially a matter for the Procedure Committee and for hon. Members themselves. Each will have his own individual views. If the House were to express views, I do not think that I would stand against them.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 4 December 1990

    Below is the text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 4th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Ministerial Accountability

    Mr. Allen : To ask the Prime Minister what proposals he has to improve ministerial accountability to Parliament.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 3 December 1990] : Ministers are already fully accountable to Parliament.

  • QEII Conference Centre Speech – 4 December 1990

    The text of Mr Major’s speech given by the Prime Minister at the presentation meeting of the new leader. The speech was given at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre at Westminster, Tuesday 4th December 1990.


    THE PRIME MINISTER

    Mr Chairman, when I joined the Conservative Party 30 years ago, I scarcely imagined this moment. That it has happened is a tribute above all to our Party and to the changes we have seen in the last decade.

    We owe so much of that to the will and determination of one woman. And I am glad beyond measure that she is here today so that we can tell her so.

    Margaret Thatcher has been a remarkable Prime Minister. There can be no doubt that history will record her as one of the great figures of our century – in Britain, and far beyond. The principles she fought for are right. They are shared by millions of people in this country. And we will build on them in the future.

    There was one simple precondition for those triumphant years.

    It is that we won three successive elections. Of course we did so partly because we were led by Margaret Thatcher. Partly because we touched the public instinct. And partly because you have made the Conservative Party the most formidable electoral fighting force in modern politics.

    But there was one other ingredient. We won those elections because we were united – in our principles, in our actions, and in a common cause.

    Margaret Thatcher knows that success for our Party depends on unity. That is why in her last speech in the Commons as Prime Minister – an unforgettable occasion for those of us who were there – she urged us all to work for a fourth election victory. So the message for the whole Party from the Branches to the Constituencies, from the backbenches to the Cabinet Room is this: there must be no backbiting, no recriminations, no post-mortems. There is too much at stake. We have an election to win.

    If there are any who doubt that judgement, let them ask themselves this question – what do the Labour Party want – and need? They want – and need – us to fight one another. So we must never forget that we have only one fight – and that fight is with them.

    Mr Chairman, people ask what I stand for.

    Let me tell you.

    First and foremost, I loathe inflation. To me inflation is not an abstract concept. It means the destruction of competitiveness for industry and commerce. It brings the destruction of peace of mind for people who see prices rising beyond their capacity to pay. It is economically destructive and socially divisive.

    So the centre piece of our policy must be an intolerance of inflation and a determination to beat it.

    Mr Chairman, what are our hopes?

    Again, let me tell you mine.

    It is to build a truly open society.

    Open because we believe that every man and woman should be able to go as far as their talent, ambition and effort take them. There should be no artificial barrier of background, religion or race. A society of opportunity where people can better themselves and their families by their own efforts. A Britain that puts people in control of their own lives, to exercise their own choices in their own time, in their own way.

    And yes, amidst the inevitable competitive thrust of life, it should be a compassionate society. Genuinely compassionate – because some people do need a special helping hand to help them enjoy a full life of choice and independence. And we should never forget that small changes in the lives of private people are every bit as important to them as dramatic changes in the lives of public people. And a classless society: not in the grey sense of drab uniformity – but in the sense that we remove the artificial barriers to choice and achievement.

    We should not underestimate what has already been achieved.

    But there is still more to be done.

    For there are still too many corners of Britain in which the effects of our Conservative reforms are yet to be felt.

    It is for this reason that I want the 1990s to become a Decade of Opportunity.

    Let there be no doubt that in spreading opportunity we must continue to encourage wealth creation.

    Continue to keep taxes low on families and on business.

    And continue to reduce regulation and promote enterprise.

    And, of course, we must continue to enlarge the private sector wherever we can. But where services do remain in public hands we will not hesitate to apply private sector skills to ensure that they are more efficient and deliver the high quality that people deserve and demand.

    When I came into the Party we had set ourselves the goal of a property-owning democracy.

    We wanted people to own their own homes.

    Now two thirds of families do.

    In the 1980s we worked for the capital owning democracy – more building society accounts, more shares, more personal pensions.

    And millions of families have gained from the actions we took.

    Now in the 1990s we must work to extend savings further.

    For two reasons: one economic and one social.

    The economic reason is that as a nation we will need those savings in the 1990s to finance the investment necessary to keep our companies competitive.

    And I don’t want those savings to be imported; I want those savings to be British.

    The social reason is that we want more people to have savings behind them. Because money set aside gives them and their families a greater sense of security and a wider freedom of choice.

    Those who talk of the selfish society misjudge a country in which more time is volunteered and more money is given in help to others than anywhere in Europe.

    For what do you see if you go to a local charity, the Citizens Advice Bureau, or the Red Cross?

    Half your constituency executive: that’s what you see!

    The challenge to us now is to remain the radical Party.

    Spreading the privileges once available to the few so they can be enjoyed by the many.

    We are committed to schools where all children have a quality education. We have brought in open enrolment, given financial control to the schools, encouraged more involvement by parents, and introduced a national curriculum. Now we want to ensure that the best people are attracted into the teaching profession and that teachers command respect for the job they do.

    We offer no sudden solutions or miracle cures.

    But where we find that things are not quite right, we will listen, and we will make the changes that are necessary.

    And that is precisely why we have put in hand a further review of the Community Charge.

    The Government that never reviewed policies, never made any.

    Mr Chairman, in this country 32 million people are under the age of 40.

    If we are to build for them we must look to the kind of world we would like to see in 25 years time and begin building it.

    The European Community remains central to our place in Europe and the wider world.

    The Channel Tunnel, connected this last week re-emphasises yet again that we are part of Europe.

    I believe it is in our national self-interest to help build and shape the European Community as it evolves.

    We must be in there, arguing, persuading and, yes, fighting for our interests and our vision of Europe.

    Just like our partners.

    But being a good European does not mean accepting every proposal from the Community.

    The more committed we are to our role in Europe, the more we must ensure that the Community is constructed on the principles we care about: liberalism in economics, democracy in politics, evolution in constitutional questions, and cooperation in foreign policy.

    So we will set out to work with our Community partners in building such a Europe. And do so with enthusiasm.

    But we will not be deterred either from saying what we believe to be wrong – or pressing what we believe to be right – by the cry that we are insufficiently European.

    Politely but firmly we shall say what we think.

    And our partners will respect us for it.

    Mr Chairman, there is one dark cloud that hangs over us.

    In recent months we have seen the invasion and systematic destruction of Kuwait.

    And now the United Nations Security Council has taken a momentous decision. It authorises use of all necessary means – and that includes force – if Iraq does not withdraw by the middle of January.

    No-one should doubt our objective.

    We want to see a peaceful solution in the Gulf.

    That is our preferred outcome.

    So we fully support President Bush when he says that he is prepared to travel the extra mile to achieve such a solution.

    So are we.

    But there can be no question of negotiations, concessions, partial solutions or linkage to other issues.

    The whole international community has made it clear that Iraq has to withdraw from Kuwait totally and unconditionally.

    The legitimate government has to be restored.

    And of course, all the hostages have to be released and sent home to their families – where they belong.

    If Saddam Hussein does that, he need have no fear of attack. It is in his hands.

    But for the international community, a vital principle is at stake. It is not only the restoration of the rightful government of Kuwait, important though that is. It is that if we want a safe world in future, Iraq’s aggression must be reversed.

    Mr Chairman, everyone’s political belief stems from his personal experience.

    My Conservatism comes from what I saw, what I felt and what I did, as well as what I read.

    It shaped what I want to do.

    To me, Conservatism is not a creed. It is essentially the common sense view of life from a tolerant perspective. And let me give you two cast-iron pledges today. As long as I am privileged to lead our Party it will never become an exclusive club.

    Conservatism will remain a word for economic progress, social mobility and for the individual dignity that is the natural right of every citizen. Ours must be a Conservatism which touches every instinct and enters every home.

    It will never be a word for “nothing left to do”.

  • PMQT – 4 December 1990

    Below is the text of Prime Minister’s Question Time from 4th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Engagements

    Q1. Mr. Archer : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 4 December.

    The Prime Minister (Mr. John Major) : This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others, including one with the Prime Minister of New Zealand. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.

    Mr. Archer : Has the right hon. Gentleman found time to consider which of the policies in which he participated over the past 11 years he now regrets and proposes to change? If the answer is that the Major revolution amounts to no more than requiring back-seat drivers to belt up, what benefits have the public received in exchange for the expensive telephone bills incurred by Government Departments in the course of the past month’s plotting?

    The Prime Minister : I can tell the right hon. and learned Gentleman one thing. There is one back-seat injunction that I shall not follow–I shall not turn left.

     

    Q2. Mr. Paice : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 4 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Paice : Has my right hon. Friend seen this morning’s press tribute to his and my county of Cambridgeshire for the way it has given as much management control to schools as if those schools had adopted grant- maintained status? Will he compare that with the proposal to introduce new, politically appointed bureaucracies, which may aim high but will inevitably lower standards to that of the lowest standard achievable, as one would expect of Labour party policies?

    The Prime Minister : I am grateful to my hon. Friend for that information. I saw this morning’s papers and I know that Cambridgeshire county council has been innovative in education for a long time. I am delighted to see what it is now doing. I agree that expensive bureaucratic control of education will only withdraw resources from the classroom, whereas our policy is to ensure that resources remain in the classroom.

    Mr. Kinnock : The right hon. Gentleman has been good enough to refer to the personal debt of gratitude that he owes to the national health service. Does he think that it would be right to discharge that debt by getting rid of hospital opt-out?

    The Prime Minister : Self-government within the NHS will improve management. That is why so many hospitals are seeking to opt out. In the past 10 years, more resources have been added to the NHS than anyone could have imagined. There is no doubt that in future the NHS will be at the centre of our concerns.

    Mr. Kinnock : It is clear that the Prime Minister intends to make no change for the better in the NHS. Is he not aware that whenever a ballot has been held, consultants, hospital doctors, nurses, general practitioners and the general public have all voted by huge majorities against opting out? Does he realise that opt-out will intensify the crisis in the NHS? As the NHS has never done anything but good by him, why is he doing it so much harm?

    The Prime Minister : Unlike some Opposition Members, I unfailingly use the NHS. Its future is entirely secure, with increased funding, as it has been for the past 10 years.

    Mr. Kinnock : If the right hon. Gentleman believes that to be the case, should not he make a start by trying to convince his constituents about the Hinchingbrooke hospital in his constituency, where waiting lists have doubled in the past two years? The local press has referred to a wall of opposition against opting out. Will the right hon. Gentleman support his constituents?

    The Prime Minister : Self-government is being proposed by the consultants and the staff at the Hinchingbrooke hospital, which holds the enormous affection of people in the area. I can tell the right hon. Gentleman something else about that hospital : it was not available under the Labour Government–it was this Government who provided it.

    Mr. Higgins : I congratulate my right hon. Friend on becoming Prime Minister and also on the speech that he made earlier today, which I thought embodied the spirit of the late Iain Macleod. In that context, and in that spirit, may I ask him to give urgent consideration to two particular injustices–first, the position of those haemophiliacs suffering from AIDS as a result of blood products provided by the national health service and, secondly, the position of those who suffered as a result of being exposed to radiation from the atomic tests carried out immediately after world war 2? I do not expect him to give an answer off the top of his head–that would be unfashionable–but would he give those matters urgent consideration?

    The Prime Minister : As my right hon. Friend knows, I like to consider matters before reaching a conclusion. However, I shall certainly accept his injunction and do so.

    Mr. Ashdown : When the Prime Minister gave his right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment what we now understand to be carte blanche for a fundamental review of the poll tax, did he rule out the option of abolishing it?

    The Prime Minister : My right hon. Friend and I will be discussing later today the precise remit for consideration.

    Mr. Nicholls : Has my right hon. Friend had the opportunity to consider the latest computer analysis from the Institute of Directors on the top-performing companies in Europe? Has he noted that there are more United Kingdom companies than German or French companies in the top 100 and does not that say far more about the underlying strength of the British economy than the economic illiteracy that we hear from the Leader of the Opposition?

    The Prime Minister : My hon. Friend is right. There is absolutely no doubt about the revolution in the prospects for this country over the past decade.

     

    Henley-on-Thames

    Q3. Mr. Skinner : To ask the Prime Minister if he will pay an official visit to Henley-on-Thames.

    The Prime Minister : I have no present plans to do so.

    Mr. Skinner : When the Prime Minister finally gets round to going to Henley and perhaps having a rubber chicken dinner with his right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment, will he tell the voters of Henley why he has managed to offend the Welsh, the blacks and others– [Interruption] including women, in his first seven days in office? Is that how he intends to start building his classless society?

    The Prime Minister : I think that the hon. Member for Bradford, South (Mr. Cryer) was writing down the question that he intended his hon. Friend to ask and not the one that his hon. Friend did ask. In so far as the question presumably relates to Mr. Taylor, the prospective Conservative candidate in Cheltenham, the reported remarks–which I understand have been denied–are not sentiments that have any place in our party.

    Mr. Adley : Is my right hon. Friend aware that the branch line to Henley-on-Thames remains intact? Does he recognise that if more decisions of that nature had been taken by British Rail in the past few years, and fewer decisions of the kind taken following the disastrous Beeching report, many more of our fellow citizens would today have the opportunity to travel by train which has been denied them by the closures of recent years?

    The Prime Minister : I was aware of the excellent service from Henley. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment reports to me regularly on it.

     

    Engagements

    Q4. Mr. Illsley : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 4 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Illsley : Is the Prime Minister aware that in some areas, particularly Sheffield, general practitioners have been prevented from prescribing certain drugs to patients, in particular young children? Without rattling out the old figures about how many patients are being treated under the NHS, will the Prime Minister tell the House whether under his Government patients and, in particular, young children will be denied the medication and treatment that they need?

    The Prime Minister : I will tell the hon. Gentleman that the district health authority in his area has substantially more cash than in previous years, that the treatment of in-patients and out-patients has risen and that the quantum and quality of health treatment rises yearly.

    Mr. John Browne : Does my right hon. Friend accept that one group of our citizens who should not be subjected to the community charge are British hostages in the Gulf?

    Will he agree to issue an advice to that effect, or even a directive under primary legislation, so that uncertainty, anxiety and anger can be removed?

    The Prime Minister : I think that my hon. Friend will find that we have already sent such advice to local authorities.

     

    Q6. Mr. Vaz: To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 4 December.

    The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Vaz : Will the Prime Minister reflect on the case of my constituent, John Hall, who is dying of leukaemia, which he contracted while working on Christmas Island? Will the right hon. Gentleman, as one of the first acts of his new Administration, reverse the Government’s policy and in compassion, humanity and justice, provide John Hall and the other nuclear test veterans with the compensation that the House and the country believe that they so richly deserve?

    The Prime Minister : I will examine the particular case to which the hon. Gentleman refers. I am not familiar with the details of his constituent. I will discuss it and examine it.

    Mrs. Currie : Does my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister agree that today’s performance has demonstrated that the two main parties have both the leaders and the policies for the next general election–for us to win, and for them to lose?

    The Prime Minister : I am grateful to my hon. Friend It is not for me to reply for the right hon. Member for Islwyn (Mr. Kinnock), but if he ever needs a campaign team, I will lend him mine.

    Mr. Rees : The Prime Minister will recall that the Queen’s Speech promised that a Bill would be introduced to give our courts jurisdiction to try alleged war criminals. Does that promise still stand?

    The Prime Minister : That Bill is in the Government’s programme and it will be presented to the House. There will be suggested amendments that the House will want to examine.

    Mr. Rhodes James : Those of us of a particular generation well remember when the Russian and British people were together, when Mrs. Churchill led the campaign to support the Russian people. In the present circumstances, will not only the British Government but the British people respond as they did during the last war?

    The Prime Minister : There is considerable concern in this country about the difficulties faced by the Russian people and by President Gorbachev. There is also great warmth in this country for the changes brought about in the Soviet Union under Mr. Gorbachev’s presidency. That feeling exists not only in the House but throughout the European Community and I have no doubt that the situation in Russia will be one of many matters discussed at forthcoming Community meetings.