Category: 1979-1983 Parliament

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Cherished Number Plates – 5 July 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Cherished Number Plates, published on 5th July 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Transport what is the current charge for transferring a cherished motor car number plate; and if he will reduce this sum.

    Mrs. Chalker The present fee of £50 was set in 1977. Over the coming months I hope to improve the cherished number arrangements and I shall be considering what level of fee will then be appropriate.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on the Nature Conservancy Council – 5 July 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on the Nature Conservancy Council, published on 5th July 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to announce his choice of site for the relocation of the headquarters of the Nature Conservancy Council.

    Mr. Macfarlane I cannot give any indication at present. As soon as any decision about the relocation of the NCC headquarters has been made I will ensure that the House is informed.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Engagements – 1 July 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Engagements, published on 1st July 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Thursday 1 July.

    The Prime Minister This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Secondhand Bonds – 24 June 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Secondhand Bonds, published on 24th June 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is satisfied with the present tax treatment of secondhand bonds; and whether he will make a statement.

    Mr. Ridley Advantage has been taken of existing tax provisions to avoid income tax on the profits on certain life policies and life annuity contracts.

    Sections 393 to 402 of the Taxes Act – the “chargeable events” legislation – provide for income tax to be charged on the profits arising on these policies and contracts. By virtue of section 394(4), where a life policy has been assigned for money or money’s worth, any profits subsequently arising are taken out of the charge to income tax and become subject to a commonly much lower or nil charge to capital gains tax. Section 396(2) makes similar provision in relation to assignments of life annuity contracts.

    There has been a serious and, in recent weeks, growing exploitation of these provisions by means of the device known as secondhand bonds under which individuals have been purchasing such policies and contracts from intermediaries thereby avoiding income tax on any ultimate profits on the investment.

    The Government have therefore decided to introduce legislation in next year’s Finance Bill to amend sections 394(4) and 396(2) with effect from midnight on Friday 25 June 1982. An assignment thereafter for money or money’s worth of any policy or contract – including existing policies and contracts – will no longer remove any subsequent profit arising from the charge to income tax.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on the Manpower Services Commission – 16 June 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on the Manpower Services Commission, published on 16th June 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will set out in the Official Report the current staff level and prospective staff establishment of the headquarters of the Manpower Services Commission in Sheffield, together with details of its cost.

    Mr. Peter Morrison The head office staff of the Manpower Services Commission in London is being dispersed to Sheffield. The employment services division is already there, and the transfer of the other divisions is expected to be completed by the end of 1982. The total number of staff in the MSC head office in all locations at 1 April 1982 –including casual staff – was 2,075, and expenditure on salaries etc. in 1981-82 was £20.1 million. In its corporate plan for 1982-86 the commission has assessed its total head office staff requirements for 1984-85 as 2,158 and their cost as £20.9 million. These figures take account of additional costs for the administration of YOP and the youth training scheme, and of further economies in head office staffing.

    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Employment if he will review the staffing level of the headquarters of the Manpower Services Commission; and if he is satisfied with the cost-efficiency of its administration.

    Mr. Peter Morrison The chairman of the commission is responsible for the efficient and cost effective use of the staff it employs in discharging its responsibilities. I am assured that staffing reviews are being carried out in head office branches already in Sheffield and that other reviews are planned as work is transferred there under the dispersal programme, and I am satisfied that these reviews will ensure that MSC’s head office staff are properly employed.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Lorries and the Environment – 14 May 1982

    The text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Lorries and the Environment, published on 14th May 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the statutory provisions under which local authorities may take steps to minimise the impact of heavy lorries upon the local environment.

    Mr. Eyre Local authorities have wide powers under the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1967 as amended by the Heavy Commercial Vehicles (Controls and Regulations) Act 1973 to control the movement and parking of heavy lorries. About 850 orders involving lorry bans have been made on amenity grounds in recent years. We have recently issued further advice on the use of these powers and urged local authorities to adopt a more vigorous approach.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Electro-Convulsive Therapy Equipment – 10 May 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Electro-Convulsive Therapy Equipment, published on 10th May 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when the report of his Department’s working group on electro-convulsive therapy equipment is to be published.

    Mr. Fowler The working group, which I set up on 17 November 1981, the day on which the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ report on ECT was published, has now produced its report. This considers matters relating to suitability, safety and maintenance of ECT equipment in the NHS in England and Wales.

    The working group has recommended the replacement of certain types of ECT equipment in the NHS, in three phases, and has provided information about models currently available for consideration as replacements. Attention is drawn to the role of the manufacturer in maintenance, and the need for inspection and testing of all ECT equipment is also emphasised.

    The Report identifies four types of equipment, of which there are currently altogether about 40 sets in NHS hospitals, which should be replaced immediately because they do not produce the required stimulus, there are no adequate manufacturers’ supporting services for them and because of the inferiority of their design.

    It recommends the replacement of a further 100 sets of equipment, of one type, within a year, but suggests that these should be checked by a technically-competent person to see if any modification is required while they continue in use.

    The third phase involves approximately 110 sets of equipment, of five types, which, though considered safe, should be regularly checked and replaced by better designed models within normal equipment replacement schedules.

    I am circulating the working group’s report to all health authorities with a request that they urgently review their ECT equipment and carry out a programme of phased replacement, as necessary, along the lines recommended by the working group. I understand that my right hon. Friends the Secretaries of State for Scotland and Wales are taking similar action, in Scotland and Wales.

    Copies of the report have been placed in the Library of the House.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Train Drivers – 3 March 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Train Drivers, published on 3rd March 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will publish any information he has on the rostering systems of railway drivers and staff in other European countries.

    Mr. David Howell I understand that in four European countries the rostering systems for railways drivers is as follows. In all cases variable day rostering is the normal practice and no distinction is made between single-manned turns and the small proportion of turns which are double manned. I do not have information about other countries.

    Country | Minimum Turn (hours) | Maximum Turn (hours)

    France | No information | 9

    Germany | 6 | 12

    Holland | 5 | 9

    Sweden | 2 | 10

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Roads (Cambridgeshire) – 12 February 1982

    The text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Roads (Cambridgeshire), published on 12th February 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to conclude the joint study with Cambridgeshire county council of junctions and crossings in that county; and if he will set out the objectives of this review.

    Mr. Kenneth Clarke My Department has asked the county council as its agent to study the Al trunk road in Cambridgeshire in order to identify any need for improvement, particularly at junctions and gaps in the central reservation. This is a continuing study which will be reviewed regularly as part of the Department’s management of the trunk toad network. Any improvements found to be justified will be included in a works programme as early as possible, subject to the availability of funds.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on the A1-M1 Link – 10 February 1982

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on the A1-M1 Link, published on 10th February 1982.


    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to issue the main line and side road orders for construction of the A1-M1 link.

    Mr. Freud Asked the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make a statement about the future of the A1 –M1 link road.

    Mr. Kenneth Clarke The M1-A1 link road is a very large scheme and a great deal of work has been necessary to get it to the stage of publishing draft line and side road orders, but I hope to be able to do so soon.