Category: 1983-1987 Parliament

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Family Expenditure – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Family Expenditure on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Meacher Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what were the average expenditures per week on food for the following supplementary benefit claimants as recorded by the family expenditure survey of 1979 (a) an adult, (b) a person 16 to 17 years old, (c) a child of 11 to 15 years old, and (d) a child under 11 years old.

    Mr. Major Data in the family expenditure surveys relate to expenditure by the household as a whole and cannot be allocated to individual members, for example dependent children. In the 1979 survey, the average recorded expenditure on food of one-adult households in receipt of supplementary benefit was £8.10. Sample data in respect of 16 to 17-year-old claimants living alone are insufficient to provide a reliable estimate.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Wheelchairs – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Wheelchairs on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Hannam Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many people have (a) a powered and (b) a non-powered wheelchair on loan from the Department of Health and Social Security at the latest date for which figures are available.

    Mr. Major At 31 March 1987, 461,806 non-powered wheelchairs and 19,994 powered wheelchairs, were on issue through the Department’s wheelchair service. These figures do not accord exactly with the number of people who have a wheelchair on loan because some patients have more than one chair. No central figures of actual patient numbers are available.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Mrs SE Parker – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Mrs SE Parker on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Heddle Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will investigate the reason why the Cannock Chase district council is not carrying out calculations to ascertain whether Mrs. S. E. Parker of 56 Park View Terrace, Rugeley, Staffordshire, is entitled to housing benefit supplement to enable his Department’s Cannock office to ascertain her eligibility for exceptionally cold weather benefit; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr. Major Entitlement to housing benefit supplement is first assessed by the relevant local authority who then refer the award to the supplementary benefit office for formal authorisation. The Department’s Cannock office has now received and authorised an HBS award for Mrs. Parker and is therefore able to consider her claim for an exceptionally cold weather payment.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Disabled Persons – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Disabled Persons on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Alfred Morris Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what discussions have been held with voluntary organisations concerning the implementation of the Disabled Persons (Services, Consultation and Representation) Act 1986; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr. Major On 1 April I met members of the Steering Committee set up by the major voluntary organisations representing disabled people to monitor implementation of the Disabled Persons (Services, Consultation and Representation) Act 1986. We discussed a number of issues relating to the implementation of the Act. Members of the steering committee suggested that voluntary organisations could make a valuable contribution to further consideration of these issues, and asked that they should be given an opportunity to do so. I undertook to consider what they had said, and to write to them as soon as possible suggesting a framework for involving voluntary organisation where appropriate in future work on the implementation of the Act.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Benefits – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Benefits on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Meacher Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what groups within the 1979 family expenditure survey were used to calculate the average expenditure on food, referred to in clause 1736 of the “Guidelines for Supplementary Benefit Officers and Procedural Instructions – Supplementary Benefits” (S Manual) in the calculation of the extra costs of special diets.

    Mr. Major I refer the hon. Member to my reply to the hon. Member for Foyle (Mr. Hume) on 23 March at columns 77-78.

    Mr. McCrindle Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services when he proposed to lay regulations for the 1988 housing benefit reforms.

    Mr. Major I shall be writing to the local authority associations shortly.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on SERPS (Rights) – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on SERPS (Rights) on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. McCrindle Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services what arrangements he is making to inform people of the build-up of their rights in the state earnings-related pension scheme.

    Mr. Major I am pleased to say that, as promised in our White Paper “Reform of Social Security”, we have launched a new service which will provide people, on request, with a personal statement of the value of their additional pension rights built up in the state earnings-related pension scheme. The statement will also include, where possible, estimates of how much additional pension the person might expect to earn by state pension age if he or she continues earning and remains in SERPS. We hope that this information will be helpful to people who may be considering taking out a personal pension. Application forms for this new service are in leaflet NP38 which can be obtained from the Department’s local offices.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Pensions (Investor Protection) – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Pensions (Investor Protection) on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. McCrindle Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services if he will now announced the investor protection arrangements for occupational and personal pensions.

    Mr. Major I have published today a paper setting out our proposals for the investor protection arrangements that will apply to personal pensions and contracted out money purchase occupational pension schemes under the Social Security Act 1986. Copies are available in the Library. The paper is being given a wide circulation to interested parties, and comments are invited by 11 May.

    The investor protection proposals confirm that the Government intend to rely wherever practicable on the extensive investor protection regulatory framework provided by the Financial Services Act 1986. The marketing and selling of personal pensions will be subject to rules made under the Act, though separate arrangements are proposed for those types of pension scheme that do not fall within the scope of the Act. Administrative charges for personal pensions will not be controlled, at least for the time being, in the expectation that charges will stabilise at acceptable levels as a result of competition and disclosure.

    For completeness, the paper also sets out the Government’s proposals on investment controls and disclosure of information. Draft regulations on these subjects have already been published for comment.

    In preparing the investor protection framework our aim has been to strike a balance between the need to safeguard scheme members’ interests on the one hand and the necessity of ensuring that effective competition between pension providers is not hampered by over-regulation. We believe the balance is right, and I am glad to acknowledge the invaluable assistance we have received from members of the group convened by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State to advise us on these matters.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Blindness – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Blindness on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Galley Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he has taken any decision on the proposals to revise and simplify the form BD8 used for certifying blindness and partial sight.

    Mr. Major I am now able to announce the outcome of the Department’s consultation exercise on the revision of the BD8 form. We have decided that the form should be revised along the lines originally proposed by the Department, that is restricted to a simple certificate of blindness/partial sight containing no clinical information. A separate anonymised epidemiological return will be made to central Government.

    In reaching this decision we are well aware of the concern of those responsible for follow-up and rehabilitation services for visually handicapped people – particularly social services departments – that they should not be deprived of information through lack of cooperation between the agencies concerned. Detailed inquiries made by the Department in several areas of the country have suggested that co-ordination between local agencies at the critical time when someone is certified as blind or partially sighted, is often not as close as it might be.

    In order to improve this situation, and to ensure that service providers receive adequate information, we have decided to establish a working group at national level to consider the principles of collaboration and communication to be observed between the various agencies involved in the provision of rehabilitation services to visually handicapped people. The working group will be chaired by a senior official from the Department, and representatives from health, social services, voluntary and consumer interests will shortly be invited to take part.
    While the group will not be considering the content of the BD8 itself, its work will form the basis of guidance to accompany the revised form. The objective of this will be to encourage more effective co-operation between agencies over the way visual handicap is established and follow-up/ rehabilitation services are triggered off. The group will be asked to consider what the resource implications of their recommendations might be.

    The chairman will be asked to make his report within 6-9 months of the working group being set up. The current BD8 will be discontinued as soon as the working group’s guidelines have been disseminated and the recommended procedures can be brought into effect.

    The effect of those changes should be to ensure that medical confidentiality is not breached, but that social services departments and other service providers are nevertheless able to obtain the specific information they need in order to provide their respective services in the most effective way.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Maternity Payments – 10 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Maternity Payments on 10th April 1987.


    Mr. Lambie Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many women in Cunninghame South claimed the maternity grant in the last year for which figures are available.

    Mr. Major Information is not available in the form requested. The Cunninghame South constituency is covered by the Department’s local office at Irvine although its boundaries are not conterminous with the constituency. The number of claims for maternity grant received at the Irvine local office during the 1986 calendar year was 1,451.

    Mr. Lambie Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services how many women in Cunninghame South received maternity allowance in the last year for which figures are available.

    Mr. Major Information is not available in the form requested. But in the 12 months ending April 1986, the latest year for which figures are available, 1,113 claims to maternity allowance were made at the Department’s office in Irvine which covers the constituency although the boundaries are not conterminous.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Board and Lodging Changes – 9 April 1987

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Board and Lodging Changes on 9th April 1987.


    Mr. Norris Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether he will be changing the arrangements for paying benefit to people in lodgings following the issue of the consultative document “Help with Board and Lodging Charges for People on Low Incomes”; and whether he will make a statement.

    Mr. Major The consultative document proposed that from April 1988 unemployed people in lodgings should be eligible for housing benefit to meet their accommodation costs and income support for their other needs. This change would replace existing provision whereby supplementary benefit meets both housing and living costs.

    Over 170 responses were received. There was widespread acceptance of the principle that any differences between benefits payable to boarders not in work and other claimants should be based on actual differences in their circumstances. Most who commented recognised that change on the lines proposed was logical but a number of practical concerns were raised. The local authority associations, in particular, argued strongly that the change should not be made in April 1988 when local authorities will be fully occupied in starting to administer the new housing benefit scheme.

    The Government accept the force of this argument, and have decided to implement the change from April 1989, one year later than originally proposed. In the run-up to the new system, detailed arrangements for the transition will be worked out with local authorities, especially those in areas with high concentrations of boarder claimants. Discussions will also continue with local authority and other interests on the position of boarders in supported lodging schemes, on whose behalf it has been argued that similar considerations arise to those affecting hostels. As indicated in the consultative document, the Government intend to defer a final decision on arrangements for hostels in order to set them in the context of the current work on related aspects of community care. The position of people in supported lodgings will also be considered in this context.

    There is clear research evidence that the lifestyle and circumstances of boarders are close to those of the far larger number living in other multiply occupied dwellings. Paying higher rates of income support to some or all boarders, as some have suggested, would simply perpetuate the distortions our proposals are designed to rectify. The Government have therefore decided that, from April 1989, the generality of people not in work in ordinary board and lodgings should qualify for income support and housing benefit in the same way as everyone else. For ease of administration and certainty for claimants, deductions from housing benefit in respect of meals provided will be fixed at standard rates. This is the course preferred by local authorities. On the basis of current information about food costs, the deduction for breakfasts only would be of the order of £1, and for full board £11.50.

    During the interim period from April 1988, boarders will continue to receive benefit on broadly the same lines as now with some adjustments to align these provisions with the new structure of income support. Time limits will continue to apply to benefit for younger boarders until the new system is introduced.

    The Government remain committed to provision for boarders which will enable real needs to be met while keeping expenditure under control and curbing abuse. The system to be introduced from April 1989 will not only achieve those ends, but remove a source of distortion in the housing market and secure equity between boarders in and out of work, and income support claimants in all types of tenure.