Category: Chief Secretary (1987-1989)

  • Mr Major’s Speech on Taxation – 18 March 1988

    Below are extracts from Mr Major’s speech made to the Conservative Party Central Council meeting at Buxton on 18 March 1988. The extracts were published by Conservative Central Office as document 107/88.


    JOHN MAJOR:

    Labour have accused us of producing a budget for the “super-rich”. The best-off in society. They say that they are the only beneficiaries of abolishing the higher rates.

    They are wrong. The whole economy benefits from lower tax rates. Because high tax rates stifle enterprise and dynamism. They remove the incentive to invest, expand and take risks. And without such incentives we have fewer jobs and lower living standards. For everyone.

    They are wrong for another reason. For almost 2/3rds of those who benefit from the abolition of higher rates earn less than £40,000 a year. People like many surgeons, scientists, senior managers, the headmaster of a large comprehensive school, the university professor. Not the privileged elite but the talented people whose skills we need here.

    And they are the very people we would lose if we stuck to tax rates well above those in other countries. For around the world Governments have recognised that high taxation deters effort and enterprise. We could ignore the worldwide trend to lower taxes – but only at the price of seeing these people take their skills abroad – to the US with a top tax rate of 28 cents in the dollar, to Canada with a top tax rate of 29 cents in the dollar; even to Socialist Australia and New Zealand. Is that really in the country’s interest?

    But not only do Labour oppose the higher rate cuts. On Wednesday I asked John Smith to deny that he would reverse the cuts in basic rate tax of the past two budgets and take it back to 29p. Not one word of denial.

    But Labour would not stop at that. For it is now clear that they stand by their commitment to abolish the ceiling on National Insurance Contributions. A commitment we uncovered to their dismay during the election. That means they want to slap an extra 9p in the pound in tax on all those earning over £15,860 – on the senior registrar, the middle manager, the deputy headmaster, the university lecturer. I gave Mr. Smith the chance to deny that too. Not one word of denial.

    So now we know, Labour believe in high taxes. Not just for the super-rich. But for every taxpayer in the country. And we are the only party of low taxation. The only party that believes people know best how to spend their own money, on their own behalf, on their own families. And that is why we have set a new target: a basic rate of 20p in the pound as soon as we prudently and sensibly can.

    But not recklessly. For we are also the party of prudence. To increase public expenditure while reducing taxes would be noteworthy in itself. It would have been easy to do that by putting it on tick. To do so while decreasing debt is a great achievement. Nigel Lawson deserves great credit for balancing the Budget. Through his efforts we are no longer day to day debtors.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Statistics – 17 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Statistics on 17th March 1988.


    Mr. Barry Field To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what steps he intends to take to improve the economic statistics published by his Department; (2) if he will list the measures taken to improve the accuracy of his Department’s economic statistics since 1981.

    Mr. Major Steps are constantly being taken to improve Treasury statistics.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on the Gross Domestic Product – 17 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on the Gross Domestic Product on 17th March 1988.


    Mr. Barry Field To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he last reviewed the allowance of 1.25 per cent. of the expenditure measure of gross domestic product to take account of(a) tax evasion and (b) self employment.

    Mr. Major A “net allowance for evasion”, equal to 1.25 per cent. of the expenditure-based measure of gross domestic product (GDP) since 1981, is added to the income-based measure of GDP. This allowance represents the extent to which expenditures which are not concealed from statistical sources result in factor incomes (mainly of the self-employed) which are concealed. The allowance is necessary to ensure the conceptual equivalence of the two measures of GDP. The basis of the assessment, which is examined regularly, is described in “United Kingdom National Accounts: Sources and Methods” (paragraphs 3.32 to 3.36).

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Manufacturing – 14 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Manufacturing on 14th March 1988.


    Mr. Meacher To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what information he has as to the annual average percentage increase in (i) gross domestic product at constant market prices, (ii) manufacturing output, (iii) wages per head in manufacturing, (iv) retail prices, (v) manufacturing productivity, (vi) manufacturing investment at constant prices, (vii) wages and salaries per unit of output in manufacturing, over the period 1983 to 1987 in(a) the United Kingdom, (b) the United States of America, (c) Germany, (d) France, (e) Japan, and (f) Sweden.

    Mr. Major [holding answer 10 March 1988]: Data on (i) GDP (or GNP) at constant market prices are given in OECD Quarterly National Accounts. Data on (ii) manufacturing output and (iv) retail (consumer) prices are given monthly in OECD Main Economic Indicators. Data on (iii) wages per head in manufacturing are given monthly in the Employment Gazette. Data for (vi) manufacturing investment at constant prices are given in the OECD National Accounts (Volume II: Detailed Tables). Data for (v) manufacturing productivity can be calculated from the series for manufacturing output and employment given in the OECD Main Economic Indicators. Data on wages and salaries for unit of output are not published in any standard international source.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Rating Reform – 11 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Rating Reform on 11th March 1988.


    Dr. Cunningham To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when and in what form he plans to make announcements about future levels of the national non-domestic rate; and when he proposes to exercise his power, or indicate that he will not exercise his power, to set the national non-domestic rate multiplier under the proposed amendments to the Local Government Finance Bill.

    Mr. Major [holding answer 10 March 1988]: Under provisions of the Local Government Finance Bill now before Parliament, the Government will, in 1990, set NNDR multipliers in England and Wales so as to produce the same yield of business rates in each country as if the rate poundages set by local authorities in 1989 had been indexed to the retail prices index and there had been no revaluation. In subsequent years, the presumption will be that indexation of the NNDR multipliers to the RPI provided for in the Bill will take place.

    Equivalent provisions are already in the Abolition of Domestic Rates Etc. (Scotland) Act. If, however, I decide to use powers in the proposed amendments to increase the NNDR multipliers by less than the RPI in any year, an announcement would be made before the RSG reports for that year had been approved by Parliament.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Prospects -10 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Prospects on 10th March 1988.


    Mr. Bill Walker To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he intends to meet the director general of the Confederation of British Industry to discuss the prospects for the economy.

    Mr. Ian Bruce To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he next intends to meet the director general of the Confederation of British Industry to discuss the prospects for the economy.

    Mr. Patrick Thompson To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he next intends to meet the director general of the Confederation of British Industry to discuss the prospects for the economy.

    Mr. Fallon To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he next intends to meet the director general of the Confederation of British Industry to discuss the prospects for the economy.

    Mr. Major My right hon. Friend meets the director general of the Confederation of British Industry from time to time. But he has no specific plans to meet him in the foreseeable future.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Industrial Investment – 10 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Industrial Investment on 10th March 1988.

    Mr. Nigel Griffiths To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what action he proposes to take to stimulate investment in British industry.

    Dr. Moonie To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what action he proposes to take to stimulate investment in British industry.

    Mr. Major The Government’s economic policies will continue to encourage capital investment by promoting an environment in which business can prosper.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on the Gross Domestic Product – 10 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on the Gross Domestic Product on 10th March 1988.


    Mr. Ashby To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the growth of gross domestic product over the latest full year for which figures are available.

    Mr. Hayward To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what has been the growth of gross domestic product over the latest full year for which figures are available.

    Mr. Major We do not have estimates for the income and expenditure measures of GDP for the whole of 1987. In the first three quarters of 1987 the average measure of GDP was 4 per cent. higher than in the same period a year earlier.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Growth – 10 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Economic Growth on 10th March 1988.


    Mr. Hanley To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the growth in the non-oil economy in 1987.

    Mr. Jacques Arnold To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his latest estimate of the growth in the non-oil economy in 1987.

    Mr. Major Preliminary estimates suggest that non-oil output rose by over 5 per cent. in 1987 compared to 1986.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Balance of Payments – 10 March 1988

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Balance of Payments on 10th March 1988.


    Mr. Bill Michie To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on his current estimates of the balance of payments for the United Kingdom in the present, and the next, financial years.

    Mr. Major My right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer will be making a forecast at Budget time.