Tag: Bangladesh

  • Banquet in Honour of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh – 11 March 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech at a banquet in honour of India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, held at the Banqueting House on Tuesday 11th March 1997.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Ladies and Gentlemen

    May I welcome all of you here this evening.

    We’re here as part of the celebrations of the 50th anniversary of the independence of India and Pakistan. On 15 August it will be fifty years since the last Viceroy of India hauled down his flag and new independent countries were born.

    On 4 February next year Sri Lanka also celebrates 50 years of independence.

    And we are here tonight to honour Bangladesh as well.

    Looking back over the last 50 years, all these countries have faced many challenges. Today, they have much to be proud of. In all of them – the anniversaries will be celebrated with enthusiasm for what has been achieved and optimism for the future.

    We share that. So we will also celebrate them here. Some might find that odd. I don’t. And I’ll tell you why.

    Britain’s relationship with the sub-continent goes back four hundred years. It goes back to when the first British travellers gazed in awe at the magnificence and power of the Moghal empire.

    The long years of the Raj followed. Views on that period are bound to differ. Tonight is not an occasion to dwell on it. We now have a modern partnership with the countries of South Asia. A partnership successive governments in all our countries have fostered and encouraged.

    Upon what is it based – this partnership? It’s based on the values we hold in common: the values of;

    – democracy

    – parliamentary government

    – the rule of law

    – freedom of speech

    – respect for human rights.

    Democracy may have sometimes seemed a fragile plant in South Asia. But I believe it has firmly taken root. Pakistan and Bangladesh have had some turbulent times over the last year. But ultimately people have decided at the ballot box who should govern them. And I still marvel at the scale of the Indian general election last year, when a staggering 343 million people voted in the largest democratic exercise the world has ever seen.

    English provides us with a common language with which to express these common values. It binds us together. As does our membership of a Commonwealth that has become more important as it has modernised.

    But the most important bonding is the deep well of friendship built up over generations. It is a well that has never run dry over political differences. And never run dry in half a century of rapid change.

    Some of those who took part in the events of 50 years ago would, I suspect, have been surprised by the depth and breadth of the links between the United Kingdom and South Asia today.

    These links are being made and remade every day. By businessmen. By students. By tourists. And by people visiting their families and friends.

    – There are more than three thousand Indian students studying in Britain. Literally, thousands more come from Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

    – Fifty thousand British tourists visit Sri Lanka every year – more than from any other country. Another one hundred and eighty thousand go to India.

    – Twenty-seven thousand British business people visit India every year.

    These are just a few of the illustrations of the richness and vigour of the connections between Britain and South Asia today.

    Nowhere are these connections more visible than among community life here in Britain. You only have to look round this room to see what a contribution people from South Asia make – today – to life in this country.

    From the entrepreneur striving to make his business succeed, to the cricketer teaching us, cricket’s inventors, just how well it can be played, to members of the Houses of Parliament, there is a South Asian flavour to modern British life. A flavour that adds to the vitality and enterprise of this country. That enriches its culture and national life. I warmly welcome it.

    Those of you here representing the arts make a particularly distinctive contribution to the cultural scene in this country. From achievements in music, in painting, and in literature to achievements on the, screen, on the playing field, and in cooking – British culture would be poorer without you.

    But the contribution of the South Asian community in Britain goes beyond new ideas. It also strengthens the values that characterise the best in British society. Tolerance. Respect for the law. Enterprise. The efforts of ordinary, decent people to build their family life and do their best for their children.

    The fruits of these efforts are already obvious. Young Asians are corning through the education system in large numbers. Their educational achievements outstrip other groups.

    They get the best exam results in schools. They are maintaining that commitment at university. They provide an example and encouragement to others.

    Britain’s Asian communities have produced some of our most successful entrepreneurs. There are over 100 Asian millionaires in the UK. I hope there’ll be many more. So too, I suspect, do you! South Asian talent and business flair is the bedrock of many British businesses.

    I don’t say that everyone who has come to this country has had an easy time. They haven’t. For some, the going has been hard. But what I do say is this. The ledger is in credit and the British people value what South Asia has brought us.

    This is why we celebrate these anniversaries. We wish to honour the contribution South Asians make to British life. And this is why we want to strengthen further our relationship with the countries of the sub-continent.

    The political relationship has long been central. Although inevitably we have had our ups and downs with individual countries, our political links with each of the countries concerned are in many ways closer than they have ever been.

    But relations have now taken on an extra dimension. Over the last few years, we have transformed the economic relationship between Britain and South Asia. Trade, in both directions, is booming and is now worth over four billion pounds a year.

    Let me give you an example. In 1993 I visited India. P V Narasimha Rao, who was then the Indian Prime Minister and I launched what we called the Indo-British Partnership. It struck a chord.

    Business took up the challenge. Trade between Britain and India doubled in just four years. And two hundred new Indo-British joint ventures have been formed every year since then.

    And it is not just with India that we have been so successful. Across South Asia, British firms are leading investors and partners.

    – In Pakistan, National Power are the largest investor in a joint project that will provide 13 per cent of Pakistan’s power capacity.

    – When I was in Dhaka in January, I witnessed the signing of Cairn Energy’s one hundred and fifty million US dollar contract with Petrobangla. Sales over the next 15 years should be worth one billion US dollars.

    – Sri Lanka is now the leading foreign supplier for Marks and Spencer. Many of these goods come from joint ventures between British and Sri Lankan companies.

    At the same time, South Asian firms are increasingly looking to Britain for suppliers and markets.

    They do so because they can find something more in Britain. They can find the enterprise capital of Europe. They can find access to the European Union’s Single Market. And they can find a country that is genuinely open to the outside world – open to her old friends and modern partners in South Asia.

    I was last in South Asia in January, when I visited India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. It’s a continent that I love. There is such richness, such diversity, such vibrancy that one can never tire of it.

    As Prime Minister on such visits, one has to wear many hats – metaphorically and literally. Some of them are more fetching than others? Have got more publicity than others! But it was striking to talk with South Asian leaders about economic reform.

    This may sound like a dry subject. But I believe that it’s the single most important issue for the people of South Asia. We have learnt by experience that to compete in the modern world you have to change. This can be uncomfortable. But change that is made for a purpose is worthwhile.

    All the South Asian leaders I met stressed, again and again, that their purpose was to realise their country’s potential. Their political potential. Their economic potential. And, above all, their human potential – by improving the quality of life of their people.

    That is why they are committed to opening markets, to removing red tape, and to welcoming investors.

    And that is why we in Britain are committed to responding. UK firms have the expertise, the experience and the will to help the economic transformation of South Asia.

    The UK’s development assistance programme is also geared to helping change. We are working with the countries of South Asia to develop their human resources, through better education and health. We are cooperating to create the conditions needed for increased private investment. And I saw for myself in Bangladesh how Britain is helping to stimulate entrepreneurial skills by giving micro-credit to small and new businesses.

    Each country faces different problems. They are at different stages.

    I welcome the latest Indian budget as an important step on the road of fiscal reform. India can also think of the opportunities if infrastructure bottlenecks are removed. If closed business sectors are given the freedom to serve their countrymen. If, for example, the insurance sector is opened up to investment.

    The new government in Pakistan can think of what can be achieved by pushing on with liberalisation and fiscal reform.

    And Bangladesh and Sri Lanka can think of their potential if they make a success of privatisation.

    Make no mistake. All are facing in the right direction. Towards open markets and liberal economies, where people are free to exploit their energy and enterprise. It is the direction that we in Britain are facing too. And because we all face the same way, our partnership has real meaning.

    For India and Pakistan this year is the fiftieth of their existence as modern states. We know they’ll celebrate. It’s their party. But we would like to join in. To demonstrate that we are old friends. And modern partners.

    I hope too that this year will see greater partnership between India and Pakistan. The prospect of talks between Nawaz Sharif and Deve Gowda is very welcome.

    As I speak, the Royal Yacht Britannia is in Bombay, after a very successful visit to Karachi. With her are the Lord Mayor of London and many British business people, including representatives of the insurance companies who have generously sponsored this occasion. Anthony Nelson, the Minister of Trade, who is here this evening, will jet off tomorrow morning to join them.

    The British Council is putting on an exciting programme of cultural events funded jointly by India, Pakistan: and British companies.

    In India, the highlight will be an exhibition of treasures from the British Museum. entitled “The Enduring Image”.

    In Pakistan, another exhibition “Traditions of Respect” will celebrate the contribution of the Islamic world to British culture.

    I know there will also be many cultural events in this country. Some will form part of the programme of events the Government is organising to mark these anniversaries.

    But I am delighted that there will also be many more unofficial events across the country:- Banquets. Festivals. Music, dance and drama. Sporting events. Exhibitions and displays in museums, galleries and historic houses. All reflect the friendship of our countries, the vitality of our communities, and the creative value of their meeting. All are a demonstration of the energy and enthusiasm of people m this country, for the countries of South Asia.

    Finally, as 1997 draws to a close, two events will symbolise our enduring friendship.

    Her Majesty The Queen will visit the sub-continent in October to wish India and Pakistan well in their anniversary year. And all of us – Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, India and the United Kingdom – will participate in the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Edinburgh this autumn.

    In celebrating the last fifty years, we celebrate a shared history, shared values and a truly modern partnership. And above all we can look forward to a shared future in which our roads, our cultures, our interests will be shared as never before. I wish the countries of South Asia every success over the next fifty years. I am sure they will achieve it.

  • PMQT – 14 January 1997

    Below is the text of Prime Minister’s Question Time from 14th January 1997. Michael Heseltine responded on behalf of John Major.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Engagements

    Q1. Mr. Ainger: To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 14 January.

    The Deputy Prime Minister (Mr. Michael Heseltine): I have been asked to reply.

    My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister is returning from an official visit to India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

    Mr. Ainger: Has the Deputy Prime Minister seen the results of a survey conducted by the Health Visitors Association showing that 2 million British children are malnourished, that one third of health visitors are dealing with childhood tuberculosis and that rickets has returned to plague hundreds of British children? Does the right hon. Gentleman agree with the association that those appalling effects on health are a direct result of family poverty and deprivation, and does he agree with me that any Government who are able to recreate the social conditions of the 19th century at the end of the 20th do not deserve to serve into the 21st?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: The last occasion on which we saw some of the social conditions of the 19th century was in 1979, when the winter of discontent characterised the activities of the last Labour Government. The survey to which the hon. Gentleman refers has been drawn to my attention and I reject its findings.

    Mr. Richards: Has my right hon. Friend seen today’s edition of the Western Mail? Its front page states that the water and electricity giant Hyder is to move into the gas supply market, which would reduce prices by some £40 a year for the consumer. Does he agree that, if there were a windfall tax, Welsh consumers would be robbed of price cuts, and Labour’s policies would yet again end in tears?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: My hon. Friend is absolutely right to point to the dangers of imposing a windfall tax on the people of Wales. He would, however, also be right to point to the dangers for a large number of people–pensioners and employees–who would suffer from the punitive effects of such a tax; although it must be said that, according to recent evidence, no such tax could be effectively levied. That leaves the question, “Where is the money coming from to fund Labour’s extravagant expenditure plans?”

    Mrs. Ann Taylor: Does the Prime Minister accept the verdict of the British Medical Association that the health service is facing its worst crisis for 10 years?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: It is difficult for the hon. Lady to suggest, when we have just announced £1.6 billion extra expenditure, that there is a crisis in the health service. The fact is that 25,000 patients a day are being treated in the health service. Nothing does more damage to the morale of those who work in it, and provide excellent service, than the endless sniping of the Labour party, which is obviously oblivious to the fact that for most of its life the health service has been safe in the hands of Tory Governments.

    Mrs. Taylor: Does the Deputy Prime Minister not realise that the picture that he paints bears little resemblance to the everyday experiences of ordinary families in Britain? His complacency is an insult to the families of women in Leeds and London who died in the past few days because intensive care beds were not available. Can he not understand that his failure to give a serious answer to serious questions proves beyond doubt that the health service is not safe in Tory hands?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: As we are spending £724 for every man, woman and child in Britain, perhaps the hon. Lady will explain how things were better when it was only £444 in 1978-79, but there is a serious point behind what the hon. Lady raises: the need to provide intensive care beds. That is why, in December, we set up a national register for intensive care beds so that, by a single call, doctors can find out where they are–[Interruption.] I would have thought that the Labour party would be interested in the health service. As the Labour party and the whole House will know, the demand for hospital beds can literally double in a day and if the Labour party is suggesting that, in every hospital, we should keep beds empty all the time for fear that there may be an emergency, it is important that it should say that so that we can understand the lost opportunities for a large number of patients who rely on those beds.

    Mrs. Taylor: Surely everyone in Britain has the right to expect the national health service to be able to provide emergency, life-saving treatment when it is necessary. Is not the problem with what the Deputy Prime Minister says about figures and money the basic fact that the Government have created 20,000 more administrators and lost 50,000 nurses? If the right hon. Gentleman will not accept the expert opinion of the British Medical Association, and if he wants a second opinion on the state of the health service, why not consult the people who really matter–the electorate–and the sooner the better?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: If the hon. Lady were a little more realistic with the figures that she quoted, she would have to point out that there are now 55,000 more qualified nurses and midwives than there were when the Labour party was last responsible for the health service and that waiting times are down. About 200,000 people were waiting more than 12 months in 1990–80,000 of them were doing so for more than two years–but today around 15,000 patients are waiting more than 12 months and only a couple of dozen are waiting more than 18 months.

    Dame Elaine Kellett-Bowman: Would my right hon. Friend have been prepared to answer questions from the right hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull, East (Mr. Prescott) if his friends had not been so terrified of what he might say that they bundled him off to Hong Kong?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: The right hon. Gentleman was courteous enough to ring me to explain that he could not be in the House this afternoon. I am not exactly sure why, but, given what the Leader of the Labour party said on Sunday, it occurs to me that the right hon. Member for Kingston upon Hull, East (Mr. Prescott) may have gone looking for a job.

     

    Q2. Mr. Ieuan Wyn Jones: To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 14 January.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Jones: Is the Deputy Prime Minister aware of the low morale in the teaching profession as a result of changes in the rules on the early retirement scheme and of the poor settlement that local authorities had in Wales this year? Is he aware, for example, that hundreds of teachers in Wales are applying for early retirement and that 1,000 others face redundancy as a result of local authority cuts? Are those the education policies that the Government will be pursuing in Wales in election year? If so, they are in for a rough ride. The right hon. Gentleman can restore morale by extending the consultation period on the teachers’ pension plan and by giving local education authorities more money so that they can at least maintain existing services.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Employment has made it absolutely plain why she is changing the rules of the early retirement programme. I do not know which world the hon. Gentleman is living in, but he must be aware that the Government have provided an extra £875 million for schools, colleges and universities next year. How he can talk about a crisis, I fail to understand.

    Mr. Dunn: Is my right hon. Friend aware that local government in Manchester, Liverpool, Lambeth and Islington is inefficient and incompetent and that those authorities are run by the people who wish to run the country? Run the country? The Labour party could not run a bath.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: Every time Labour spokesmen tell us what they would like to do to improve education standards I wonder why they do not talk to Labour councillors who run local education authorities and tell them to improve the appalling record over which they preside.

     

    Q3. Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 14 January.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Hoyle: Is the Deputy Prime Minister aware that on 6 March 1996 the Secretary of State for Health gave an assurance that he would keep a close eye on intensive care capacity? Despite that assurance, a lack of intensive care beds in Warrington hospital means that operations are being cancelled and patients are being transferred to hospitals as far away as Leeds. That is happening not just in Warrington but throughout the north-west. Because of the Government’s folly, the number of bureaucrats has increased threefold at the expense of beds for patients. What does the Deputy Prime Minister, the most important person in the country at the moment, intend to do about that?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I share the hon. Gentleman’s concern about the provision of emergency beds. Health service administrators, who, as I said, cope with 25,000 patients a day, do a remarkable job in extraordinarily difficult and unpredictable circumstances. If one asks our hospital administrators to keep beds empty in anticipation of emergency admissions, one must explain to those who do not get the advantages of those beds why they are empty. Labour would be the first to complain if it could show that beds were empty because we had said that we had to keep them empty in case of emergency admissions.

    Mr. Marlow: The Government have obviously been studying the so-called windfall tax. I wonder how it would work if a company, having been floated, was then taken over–

    Madam Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman must put a question on a matter for which the Government have responsibility. If he does that, I will listen to him. If he does not, I shall call another hon. Member. Questions must be on Government accountability.

    Mr. Marlow: If my right hon. Friend were looking for advice on how to run our schools, would he take it from a party that has been running local education authorities that have produced the most appalling results in the country?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: My hon. Friend is absolutely right to point to the difference between the rhetoric and the performance of Labour local education authorities. I have no doubt that there is a chilling relationship between their incompetence in education management and the incompetence that has led to the production of an unworkable scheme called the windfall tax.

     

    Q4. Mr. Cummings: To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 14 January.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Cummings: I thank the Deputy Prime Minister for that answer. Is he aware of a recent case in which a seriously ill child of 20 months was driven from Sunderland to Edinburgh–120 miles–because of a lack of intensive care beds in Sunderland district general hospital’s paediatric unit? Will he assure my constituents, who use Sunderland district general hospital, that such incidents will not occur again, and will he ask his right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health to make a statement on the great distress in the health service?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I am not familiar with the individual constituency case to which the hon. Gentleman draws attention. I share the concern that he quite rightly feels on behalf of his constituent. However, I have answered the specific question, and I will ensure that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health is aware of the problems.

    Mr. Fabricant: Is my right hon. Friend aware that some of my poorer constituents in Lichfield can send their children to private schools because of the assisted places scheme? Will he please confirm that the Government have no plans to abolish the scheme, because without it those parents could not afford to send their children to private schools?

    The Deputy Prime Minister: I can assure my hon. Friend that we will not only maintain but expand the assisted places scheme. We believe in diversity of choice in education and in widening opportunities, which is why we have introduced legislation with precisely that purpose in mind. As I understand it, to exercise choice in the Labour party, one must either be the leader of that party or the hon. Member for Peckham (Ms Harman).

    Mr. Beith: Does the Deputy Prime Minister realise the seriousness of the crisis in the health service and the depth of concern among all who work in it and all who depend on it? Will he take positive action by using his authority to end ward closures, while an evaluation is conducted of how much reserve capacity the health service needs? Everyone in the service agrees that it must have some reserve capacity.

    The Deputy Prime Minister: Substantial capacity is available to deal with emergency cases; otherwise the very difficult cases–such as that to which the hon. Member for Easington (Mr. Cummings) drew attention–would be much more numerous. The House should salute the energy and devotion of those who work in the health service, who cope with those cases, day and night, with immense skill, care and attention.

  • Mr Major’s Joint Press Conference with Sheikha Hasina – 12 January 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s joint press conference with the Bangladeshi Prime Minister, Sheikha Hasina, on Sunday 12th January 1997.


    SHEIKHA HASINA:

    Distinguished Members of the Press. I am happy that the British Prime Minister, the Rt Hon John Major, has successfully concluded a two-day official visit to Bangladesh, and we have been pleased to receive him and Mrs Major in our midst at a time when we are celebrating the Silver Jubilee of our liberation.

    We had formal talks where we discussed the broad gamut of subjects concerning bilateral relations and international issues of major concern. The subject of increasing British investment to Bangladesh came up during the discussion. We also discussed how to increase trade flows between our two countries. He highly appreciated the economic and investment policies pursued by our government, while referring to the friendly investment climate in Bangladesh. The British Prime Minister said that British investors are keen to invest in Bangladesh. In this regard we are pleased to know that a high level British investment and business delegation will be visiting Bangladesh shortly. He also acclaimed the pioneering role of Bangladesh involving micro-credit towers for elevation.

    Prime Minister John Major has agreed to consider sympathetically our request for assistance in the field of education, training for English language teachers, higher medical studies and scientific research as well as a resumption of food aid.

    I am pleased to state that during the visit an agreement was signed between Petrobangla on one side and Cairns Energy plc [indistinct] Limited and Halliburton, Brown and Root Limited on the sale and purchase of gas. It heralds a new chapter in building the confidence of foreign investors in Bangladesh. It involves an actual investment of 188 million US dollars.

    I am looking forward to attending the Commonwealth Summit Meeting in Edinburgh which I am sure will be very productive. We also discussed matters relating to the forthcoming Conference of the Commonwealth Heads of Government and State to be held in Edinburgh in October 1997. Both Bangladesh and Britain can contribute significantly towards revitalising the Commonwealth. While reviewing our bilateral relations I recalled with gratitude the support extended by the government, the political leadership and the people of Britain during our War of Liberation.

    The visit of the Prime Minister marks a milestone in our bilateral relations. I am confident it will further contribute towards strengthening the relations between Bangladesh and Britain, particularly in the field of trade and foreign investment.

    We look forward to receiving The Prince of Wales at the end of February this year. We greatly value our relations with the United Kingdom which has emerged as the second largest export market and an important source of foreign investment.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Prime Minister, thank you. Let me just add a few words to that. I think you have set out very fully and very accurately the substance of our discussions over the last couple of days. Let me say how much I have enjoyed this short visit to Bangladesh. I very much enjoyed my meetings and discussions with you, Prime Minister, and with the President, and also the visit to the remarkable Memorial at Savar and the work that is being done across the country. I saw particularly at Manikganj some very remarkable work being done to assist in rural areas.

    It is, as you said, an auspicious time to be here. Auspicious think firstly because of the anniversary to which you referred, but also because it seems an appropriate time to look at a relationship, refresh it, modernise it and take advantage of the business and political opportunities that exist, and very self-evidently exist at the moment, to increase and deepen the relationship between our two countries.

    You have mentioned the importance of trade and investment and I don’t think I need to add anything to that, except to endorse the fact that there is a substantial trade flow now, a substantial investment flow, and there is every indication that that is likely to increase in the future. And I think that is something that we both look forward to and both welcome.

    As you said, we discussed a number of political aspects as well, relationships with the Commonwealth, where again trade, investment and development as a road to prosperity across the Commonwealth will be the substantive theme of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting at Edinburgh later on this year.

    We also noted with some interest that our troops had shared in peace keeping duties in Iraq, in Kuwait and in Bosnia, and spoke also of the opportunities that would certainly emerge in the future for that relationship also to be intensified.

    I came here as the Head of a Government of a country that is already firm friends with Bangladesh. The visit essentially was to act as a catalyst to intensify the relationship in terms of trade and also in terms of politics as well and I think we have managed to achieve that in the discussions we have had over the last day or so.

    In the past there has been quite a heavy relationship [sic] in our relationship on aid and of course the aid will continue in future. But I think it is moving beyond that with the new trading and investment relationship that now exists and you have referred, Prime Minister, to one very substantial investment that has been signed. I am sure that there will be others to come in the future.

    So we wish to see the relationship move on, move on economically to a new emphasis on trade and investment, and move on politically by focusing on democracy and Stability as the new plans and reforms in Bangladesh deepen and settle firmly into the Bangladesh way of government and life.

    I am very keen to maintain the existing links that exist and to diversify them. What I have found very refreshing on this visit is that that is clearly your wish, Prime Minister, and the wish of the government of Bangladesh as well. I am delighted that an early opportunity to develop the business links will come with a substantial trade mission led by the Chairman of the British Overseas Trade Board, Martin Laing, in just a few weeks time. And senior officials from the Overseas Development Agency will be here also to discuss elements of the aid programme for the future.

    So I think we have a very firm basis for a positive and intensified relationship and I would conclude, if I may, simply by thanking you, Prime Minister, your government and the people of. Bangladesh for their very warm and very friendly welcome on this visit.

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

    QUESTION:

    Prime Minister, you have mentioned that your visit to Bangladesh will act as a catalyst to improve the relationship between the two sides. Can you please tell me in what way this will serve as a catalyst? Have you identified any particular areas which will witness tremendous progress after the visit?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Such a thought would never have crossed my mind. How are we going to act as a catalyst? I think essentially by drawing attention to the investment and business opportunities that exist. There was a growing recognition, but I think not a sufficient growing recognition. A number of businessmen have come here with me on this particular trip. A large contract has been signed. The Prime Minister and I have discussed further options for the future. The trade mission is about to come. The publicity generated by my visit both here, and the publicity generated back at home amongst the business community, will open up the opportunities in Bangladesh to people who might not otherwise have considered them. I hope also we will have the opportunity of seeing businessmen from Bangladesh, and the Prime Minister if that is possible, also visit the United Kingdom. So I think it is in that fashion that there tends to be a catalyst.

    It has been the experience in the past that when there is a substantial trading contract of some sort that is signed, that it tends to emphasise the opportunities that exist. And I think the opening up particularly of the energy market and the remarkable contract between Petrobangla and Cairns to lift very large amounts of gas from the Bay of Bengal, is an indication, the highest single indication, the highest profile indication we have yet seen of the changing face of Bangladesh. So I think in that fashion it will act as a catalyst.

    QUESTION:

    [Indistinct] elections by May this year and there is some strength in British voters of Bangladeshi origin. Do you think their favoured response is to your political party and how much do you count on their votes?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Every individual elector in the United Kingdom will make up their own mind, you can’t treat them as groups, they are individuals. If you could treat them as groups, life would be easier, you can’t, not in Britain.

    QUESTION:

    You currently have the distinction of having good relations with the countries you are visiting now, links in a variety of ways. Do you or your country have any plan to make very good relationships amongst the countries of the sub-continent that you are now visiting? We are not having a really good friendship or good relations. Do you or your country have any plans to alter the catalyst [indistinct] among countries?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think by and large countries can best determine their bilateral relationships themselves. But where Britain is a firm friend of one or more countries, if we are asked to assist in any way then of course that assistance would be made available. But I don’t think we would gratuitously offer ourselves to do so, because I think essentially an improving relationship between countries must come about by those countries themselves. And what has been very striking, I came here, as you know, from India, and the Prime Minister of India, Deve Gowda, was also here meeting Prime Minister Sheikha Hasina, and there is no doubt about the determination amongst India and Bangladesh to improve their relationship. I think the recent water agreement on the Ganges, which has been needed for many years and hasn’t previously been possible to reach agreement, is the firmest possible indication that there is a greater intent to improve the relationships within the area. Certainly that is what the Prime Minister has said to me over the last day or so and I can assure you that that is what the Prime Minister of India said to me as well, and I look forward to similar discussions in Pakistan tomorrow.

    QUESTION:

    You met the Leader of the Opposition, Begum Khaled Zia, yesterday. Can you please tell us what she told you and what you told her?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Certainly not. Begum Khaled Zia and I have known one another for some time. We met of course during the period she was Prime Minister of Bangladesh, we met at Commonwealth Conferences and I think on other occasions as well, so I had met and known her before. Bangladesh has now turned itself into a democracy. It is standard practice in the United Kingdom that distinguished visitors from abroad will visit the Prime Minister and visit the Leader of the Opposition as well, that is the way democracy works and it works the same way in reverse. And I was delighted to see the Prime Minister, delighted to see the Leader of the Opposition and discuss matters with them. But I have to say those discussions are private. I have no more intention of revealing the private nature of my discussions with the Prime Minister than I have the private nature of my discussions with the Leader of the Opposition. I think it would not enable those discussions in future to take place on quite the same basis.

    QUESTION:

    You are leaving here for Islamabad today. Will you discuss the Kashmir issue with the Pakistan leaders and what is the stand of the UK regarding the issue of Kashmir?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think it very probably will come up. It came up with the Prime Minister of India and I think it will undoubtedly come up in Pakistan as well. I think we have made our position clear on many occasions. This is a classic occasion of an issue that cannot be solved other than by India and by Pakistan. Where our good offices can be utilised of course we would be able to assist, but I think it is a matter predominantly for them. We have made it clear that external insurgency doesn’t help, we have made it clear that there is a need for proper elections, there were elections earlier in the year. But by and large I don’t think that I am likely to arrive in Islamabad and solve the Kashmir problem tomorrow. I think that is unlikely and I think it is going to have to be solved between Pakistan and India.

  • Mr Major’s Doorstep Interview in Manikganj – 11 January 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s doorstep interview in Manikgank, given on Saturday 11th January 1997. BRAC is the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee.


    QUESTION:

    Were you impressed, Prime Minister, by the contribution Britain has been able to make to this project and many others?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Britain has made a substantial contribution and I shall be increasing that contribution again this afternoon so that B.R.A.C. can carry on this sort of work. I think it is astonishing the degree of self-help and the way in which the sums have been used; relatively small amounts of funds in some cases have been used by B.R.A.C. to very great effect and I think we have seen that this afternoon.

    QUESTION:

    How much is Britain contributing? It is, after all, just a drop in the ocean to us, isn’t it?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    In terms of Bangladesh, Britain contributes something over £53 million a year at the moment, it is one of our larger aid programmes and has been for some time and I would imagine it will continue to be so.

    QUESTION:

    And how much more are you able to give?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    There will be another few million today specifically for health programmes for B.R.A.C.

    QUESTION:

    Overall, though, the aid budget has gone down, hasn’t it?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Not in direct aid to countries that are poor, no. There are elements of the aid budget that have fallen but we have protected that consistently and you have seen this afternoon why – because this is aid going to people who are in very distinct need. Relatively small amounts often go a long way and there is not only the question of the direct provision of cash resources, there is also the provision of expertise and help and we do protect that part of the aid budget and I think anyone who has been here this afternoon can see why.

    QUESTION:

    Can we have an election pledge then that you will put it up?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    We look at it every year, Michael. You must get elections off your mind, you must concentrate on other matters, I am not here considering that. I have just given some more money now and you mustn’t ask me to deal with next year’s public expenditure round but don’t think one is unmoved by what you see on these occasions. Even you hard-bitten hacks look to me as though you have learned something this afternoon, I think it is a very worthwhile trip.

    QUESTION:

    Do you see lessons for the work of the ODA in general in what you have experienced of the B.R.A.C. project here?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I have seen it here for the first time but of course the ODA haven’t, the ODA have people resident in Bangladesh. I was speaking to ODA officials earlier today, they are very familiar with B.R.A.C. We are one of the larger donors to B.R.A.C. and have been for some time and will continue to be in the future so ODA are very closely involved with what has gone on. B.R.A.C. was established I think nearly a quarter of a century ago and you can see the astonishing work that has grown out of what in the beginning was one man’s dream of what could be done.

    QUESTION:

    But, Prime Minister, we do not tell people back home about this.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think we do a fair amount but of course it isn’t often that sort of news that catches the headlines and catches people’s imagination. Certainly we do a lot but I think more important than telling people at home what is being done is making sure that there is the capacity to continue doing the work in future and that is what the ODA is about, it is why it distributes its resources in the way it does.

    QUESTION:

    How does the aid programme work in with the trade and investment programme that you are also running here?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Of course, trade and investment has its own impact upon people’s living standards. If trade increases, if investment increases, jobs are created, if jobs are created people have money to spend, if they have money to spend that has a trickle-down effect even down to the smallest of rural enterprises. This afternoon we have seen the rearing of chickens, some of them for sale some of them for consumption, we have seen the spinning of silks. That trickle-down effect of trade and investment provides a market, provides opportunities and provides jobs so it is very important and the overall impact of increased trade and investment not just in Bangladesh but in other countries as well probably cumulatively dwarfs the sum total of overseas aid whether from the United Kingdom or all countries combined so it is very important and that is the principal reason why we keep arguing for free trade, why we keep arguing that the western democratic nations, the relatively rich nations of western Europe, should open their markets more and not keep them so closed. I think, frankly, there is something immoral in western Europe and the large wealthy countries providing aid resources with one hand but closing their markets to those countries with the other hand. If they opened their markets, then a great deal more good could be done and that is very much what Britain wishes to see.

    QUESTION:

    Isn’t the European Union to a degree [indistinct]?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Sometimes but we argue for virtue within the European Union and will continue to do so.

  • Mr Major’s Speech to Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce – 11 January 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech to the Federation of Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry, held in Dhaka on Saturday 11th January 1997.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Mr President and Cabinet Ministers, Ministers, Ladies and Gentlemen. I think at the outset I should congratulate the President on the skill with which he shortened his prepared remarks. It is a skill I think could usefully be translated to the British Parliament from time to time.

    Let me say at the outset how delighted I am to be here today. I think in many ways this is a visit that is long overdue, overdue but certainly one that I have been much looking forward to, and looking forward to I think for some very practical hard-headed business reasons of importance to my country, and I think of importance to Bangladesh as well.

    In both of our countries trade runs deep in the instincts. I recognise that. And so in addition to being pleased to be here in your country simply because I have been anxious to see it for some time, I was delighted to have the opportunity of addressing the Federation this morning to talk about matters related to business, trade and commerce. And the central message that I would like to deliver this morning is that we in Britain are keen to develop our business and commercial links with Bangladesh. We would like to increase our trade with you and we would like to increase our investment in Bangladesh, to play our part in building the Bangladesh of the future.

    Your Prime Minister, with whom I have just been meeting, where we had a very successful discussion, has in turn stressed to me your determination to move from a heavy reliance on outside aid to the inter-dependence which unites all of us in the international trading community.

    Trade, of course, is very important but it is only one of the many links between us, though I would suspect for this audience it is the one that is most appropriate and till one upon which I now wish to concentrate. We have a common business language; in important ways we have a shared history; Bangladesh’s legal system is based on that of England and Wales; and the Bangladeshi community in the United Kingdom, which has a distinctive and important contribution to modern Britain, forms a particularly important and unbreakable bond between our two countries.

    Another area, equally important but perhaps less frequently remarked upon, is the shared membership of the Commonwealth that provides a further link between our countries.

    The Commonwealth is a very remarkable institution. It draws together a unique cross-section of countries with a shared commitment to democracy and increasingly it is a modern Commonwealth, a Commonwealth prepared to tackle the critical issues of the day. Bangladesh, like Britain, has a key role to play in that Commonwealth and I very much look forward to welcoming your Prime Minister to Edinburgh at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting later this year.

    The theme that we have chosen for that Heads of Government Meeting is very appropriate, it is a theme of very key importance for the developing world as well as for the developed world. And the theme is the promotion of international trade, and I believe that is a theme that the Commonwealth is very well suited to tackle.

    The issue of trade, investment and development, that is the road to prosperity right across the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth hasn’t fully developed those opportunities yet, hasn’t fully acknowledged right across the Commonwealth the role that trade, investment and development actually have to play in the prosperity not just of countries as a whole, not just of businesses, but of many, many millions of individuals. Now those are matters that we propose to examine very carefully both up to, during and beyond the Commonwealth Conference.

    I also think those matters have a key role to play in the relationship between the United Kingdom and Bangladesh, and so on this occasion I wish to say just a little more about each of them.

    Let me start with trade. Britain already has, I am delighted to say, the largest foreign commercial presence in Bangladesh. Over 47 of our companies are now operating here in a very wide range of sectors: British-American Tobacco, now the Bangladesh Tobacco Company, is the largest single foreign investor in the country. Many others are household names like Lever Brothers, GEC, Glaxo Wellcome, British Oxygen, Hong Kong and Shanghai and the Standard Chartered Banks, known not just in Bangladesh but known as organisations in every part of the world. Many of those 47 companies – settled here already – are seeking to expand their presence. And it is both my hope and my expectation that many more British companies will follow their example in the future.

    Meanwhile trade between our two countries has risen by more than one half over the last three years alone. So investment is substantial and about to grow, indeed it has been growing today, and trade has been growing steadily and is set to grow further in the future.

    That is very attractive but I have to say, despite that, that the levels of trade between us as are still far too low. There is ample capacity for growth and improvement and I am convinced that both can and should do more. For our British part, we will be taking active steps to do so and I am delighted to be accompanied here by a number of leading British businessmen who have precisely that aim in mind.

    But just as important as increased trade is increased investment. The United Kingdom is now the world’s second largest outward investor and also the second largest investor in Bangladesh with over 300 million US dollars of direct investment registered here at present.

    That figure is about to increase further. I have just come from witnessing with Sheikh Hasina a new 150 million dollar gas production sharing contract between Britain’s Cairns Energy and Petrobangla. And from early 1998 this promises to bring gas supplies to Chittagong and to supply the Midlands Tiger Power Project proposed in Haripur. So it is a very big project which I think will have a significant boost for living standards in Bangladesh and also I hope for Bangladesh’s foreign exchange earnings as soon as the full stream of gas production comes on schedule. I hope that the final agreement on the Haripur Project can also be reached soon to give a much needed boost to power supplies in the country, and also something else as well, the clearest possible signal of encouragement to foreign investors that Bangladesh welcomes foreign investment in up-grading your infrastructure. That seems to me to be an important message.

    In Britain we too have been working hard to make ourselves an attractive location for foreign investors and we have done so for the very straightforward reason that we recognise the benefits that such investment brings – it brings jobs, it brings prosperity, it brings benefits for consumers through better quality, lower prices and a wider range of goods and services. Foreign investment forces companies to be more competitive, so prices go down and the consumer benefits.

    And in Britain the results have been striking. Since 1979 inward investment into Britain has directly created or safeguarded some 700,000 jobs and now accounts for 40 percent of our manufactured exports. This also constitutes, by any measure, a substantial contribution to the Balance of Payments. And we now have some 40 percent of all new direct investment into the European Union from the United States, Japan and Korea. And I emphasise that point for this reason. We have been seeking to create an economic structure that encourages people to invest in Britain, and they have done so. I know it is Bangladesh’s policy to create a structure that will encourage people to invest in Bangladesh and I hope and believe that you will be equally successful as your economic reforms move ahead. I know that that is the intention of your government, to make yourself an attractive location in the fierce global competition fort foreign investment.

    And I think the current approach being taken is one that seems to me to provide a good base for future development. Your provisions for 100 percent foreign ownership, repatriation of capital gains, tax holidays and low duties on the import of capital machinery have all been evidently weighed by foreign investors and I think they view those changes with very considerable delight because it opens up the market for investment in a way that was not previously the case and I am sure that is the right approach for Bangladesh to take.

    Of course there are still difficulties. Problems can’t be wiped off the slate entirely and speedily. I am sure it will not surprise you to hear me saying that although procedures for gaining approvals for new investment have been streamlined, they can still sometimes be just a touch cumbersome. The multiple permissions required can lead to bureaucratic delay and consequent discouragement. So I hope you will continue to apply your scissors ruthlessly to the red tape as you encourage further investment into Bangladesh. But what potential investors need above all is a stable and a transparent regime in which to operate, for trade and investment can be most beneficial only if they are allowed to flow with the minimum of government interference. So in the United Kingdom, for example, I have been determined to unshackle the British economy from the bonds of bureaucracy to leave the market free to operate without excessive interference by government. I commend that as a way to encourage investment.

    We of course still have more to do, but by insisting on deregulation and by remorselessly bearing down on inflation and unnecessary government expenditure the impact upon Britain has been very remarkable. We are now enjoying the best economic conditions for a generation and the strongest recovery of any of the leading European economies – inflation about 3 percent, output growing at 7.5 percent, base rates at 6 percent and unemployment now under 7 percent of the workforce and falling quite sharply.

    And with deregulation goes liberalisation and particularly pulling down trading barriers to the outside world. All the evidence indicates that it is those countries that are most integrated into the world economy – most integrated into the world economy – that achieve the fastest growth in output. And that is why I am such a passionate believer in free trade and in open markets. It is why I have called for the developed world to abolish tariffs on imports from developing countries.

    Provided that we all work on a level playing field, the opportunities for all of us, large countries, small countries, rich countries, less rich countries, are absolutely enormous. And there is of course something inherently ludicrous to my mind in the developed Western world offering aid to countries in difficulties and then not opening their markets to those same countries, thus ensuring that they stay in difficulties. And that in essence is the case for free trade and open markets. It isn’t a desirable proposition not to open those markets and leave some parts of the world all within a position where their goods are locked out of developing markets and they are not able, by their own efforts and their own skills, to improve the quality of life of their own people. So free trade, I believe, is thoroughly desirable. The British aim is to achieve total free trade by 2020 around the world and we will continue to advocate that whenever and wherever we can.

    And it is within that theme that the importance of the World Trade Organisation is most evident. It provides a framework for international commerce that fosters economic growth instead of hinders it. The World Trade Organisation held its first Ministerial Conference in Singapore last month and achieved some useful progress. I was glad to hear that the British and the Bangladeshi delegations cooperated particularly closely together during the course of that particular discussion.

    In Europe we have found that there is a wider reason as well for pursuing open markets and free trade that they help to bind countries together, encouraging wide forms of cooperation and so promoting security and stability. Because there is a plain truth in all this, a plain truth that deserves to be universally recognised. In the end, trade and investment will only flourish against a stable political background. Without a stable political background external investors won’t invest; without a stable political background internal investors will not have the security to re-invest; without a stable political background, the security of investment, and growth and the prosperity that follows it cannot be achieved. And so that is an absolute basic fundamental to prosperity for the future.

    Within the European Union we have had, of course, the good fortune to have a stable political system for a long time and the European Union not only provides a single market of some 400 million people, it has also made armed conflict between its members unthinkable though I have to confess to you it doesn’t make verbal conflict between its members at all unthinkable.

    I have been particularly encouraged by some of the recent progress which Bangladesh and other members of SARC have made, progress in promoting greater regional cooperation. With a potential market of 1.2 billion – three times the size of the European market I just referred to – the potential commercial benefits in the long term are surely self-evident but greater cooperation also offers, I believe, an opportunity to build in south Asia a region of shared prosperity between countries whose previous history has been rather more difficult and I was particularly pleased to see the conclusion of your recent water-sharing agreement with India; that is a tremendous achievement enormously to the credit of both the Bangladesh and the Indian governments and I think that has been received with pleasure i many parts of the world. Neither have the two sides stopped there. I have just come from India where I met prime minister Deve Gowda and he told me only yesterday of his productive visit here earlier this week and I hope that cooperation can be extended and developed not only with India but with other neighbours.

    Mr. President, you raised the question of the European Union, how can the European Union best help, and I think in what I have to say I answer directly the point that you had to make about it.

    Whether for central and eastern Europe or for countries further afield like Bangladesh, I am convinced that the most effective way for the European Union to encourage democracy and prosperity is for its markets to remain open to the products and investment of developing countries so let me offer you this promise today which I do so entirely willingly: we in Britain will continue to lead the way within the European Union in arguing for it to be generous and open to the products of developing countries [applause] and we will do so for the reasons I set out just a few moments ago.

    But our belief in the benefits of free trade doesn’t mean that we underestimate the difficulties of getting there and therein lies the best role of development assistance so in Britain we concentrate on using our aid budget both to help those most in need and to support countries in introducing or strengthening market disciplines and the other elements of good government. We are delighted to be working with Bangladesh. Bangladesh in fact receives more British aid than any other country bar one but in addition to that, Bangladesh has become very active in helping itself. The development of micro-credit, for example, has been a particular area in which your pioneering work can justifiably claim and receive very great credit; together with your programmes for non-formal education to help human rights, rural development, micro-credit has helped millions of your people to dignity, knowledge and greater economic independence. Later today, I look forward to seeing something of this myself at the Brac [phon] project I shall be visiting at Manikganj and I will be announcing there a further substantial grant for a programme to improve the health of mothers and their children in the area and I hope that that will prove helpful. [Applause].

    So the message essentially that I wish to leave you with today is that in all of those three areas – trade, investment and development – Britain is keen to be your partner and keen to increase our work together. As fellow members of the Commonwealth and I believe as firm historical friends as well, Bangladesh and the United Kingdom have a solid foundation upon which to build. As governments and as business partners, we can look forward to an exciting future and to a long and mutually beneficial cooperation.

    The opportunities are there for us to seize and I am sure that we can take those opportunities and I am sure that we must take those opportunities for trade touches all of us, it touches the upper strata, it touches the business classes self-evidently, of course it touches the business classes, but it also touches others as well: the revenue from successful trade accrues not only to the businessman who first concludes the deal but to the five merchants with whom he then spends the proceeds and then to the twenty-five shopkeepers when each of the first rive merchants goes into five shops with his profits from the businessman; and to the five times twenty-five wholesalers who each supply the shopkeepers and to the five times twenty-five farmers who each supply the shopkeepers and on and on. The same argument applies to the effects of investment. It is like dropping a pebble into the centre of a still pool and watching the ripples spread right out across the water and the fewer the obstacles, the truer and more complete the ripples will be and the faster and harder the pebbles are dropped, the more dramatic the results and that is why I am such a fervent believer in the benefits of free trade, of liberalisation and deregulation and I detect from the actions of your government and your reactions that many of you have the same wish.

    There is so much that needs to be done and there is so much that can be done and providing we are able to accelerate the huge flow of trade that potentially exists out there, the wall of goodwill and investment that potentially can be encouraged, to countries in need of it, providing that is encouraged then I think we can see very dramatic improvements in the volume of trade and in the volume of investment so I wish you every success in your endeavours and I give you a firm assurance that so far as it is in our power to do so, Britain will be there to help you and be there to trade with you and if I may say one thing about my country over the years, we are firm friends and we are good friends of those who historically have been our friends and our trading partners. Bangladesh is among those countries. We have a flourishing, thriving Bangladeshi community the United Kingdom that plays an important role in our society.

    I think there comes a time when the opportunities come together in a way perhaps that people have not always foreseen and I think with the developments that are now beginning to take place in Bangladesh, with the new optimism and capacity and willingness to invest overseas that exists in the United Kingdom, that this may be a particularly ripe time to ensure that the old relationship can not only be refreshed but be built on in a way that few people perhaps have yet realised. I think the opportunities are there. I hope by being here today I can indicate to you that Britain is keen to take them and thank you for your hospitality this morning. [Applause].

     

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

    1. KHABIR (PHON):

    Mr. Prime Minister, you have in your speech answered most of what I wanted to ask but I will be looking for something a little more specific.

    As you know, in recent months there has been a series of announcements and actions relating to Bangladesh, India and the north-east part of the sub-continent. This includes the agreement on water-sharing of the Ganges, continuing discussion on other rivers and reduction of tariffs by India on goods manufactured in Bangladesh and exported to India. Besides, a sub-region consisting of Bangladesh, Bhuttan, India and Nepal is in the process of being formed. These activities should open up opportunities for large-scale investment in the building of infrastructures in the region.

    How can Your Majesty’s Government be of assistance so that the business community in the United Kingdom gets to know of this vastly increased opportunity that has taken place in the last six months and how can we be of assistance in that?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Let me answer that very speedily because I think it is a very pertinent point. How can UK business potential investors realise the changes taking place in Bangladesh? Let me offer you three ways:

    I think many of them are going to spot it because I am here, because of the reporting of what has been said.

    Secondly, Sir Martin Lang will be bringing a very substantial trade mission of businessmen here just within a few weeks time; that will also generate a great deal of interest.

    Thirdly, we will disseminate the information to the larger business community via the Confederation of British Industry and the Institute of Directors and the smaller business community through the small business organisations.

    Those are three direct ways in which we can let people know of the extra opportunities that exist and we shall certainly do so.

    QUESTION:

    My question relates to grants given by the British Government to the government of Bangladesh to develop the tea industry. At present, the projects proposed by the ODA are technical projects with the component of poverty alleviation in the field of labour welfare. Our most pressing need is to upgrade the existing labour welfare facilities in education, sanitation, housing and health care. Is there any scope of ODA funding in these areas given our ability to invest only very little due to continuous low prices of tea in the international market?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Again, let me answer that very speedily and directly.

    As far as education is concerned, there is a scheme that will shortly be announced and I think you will find it will meet the sort of proposition you have in mind.

    As far as the other points are concerned, the Foreign Office – the ODA – will be sending across their most senior official who deals with overseas aid in Bangladesh; he will be here with the High Commissioner in just a couple of weeks time for substantive discussions with the government in Bangladesh and with the business community to determine where and how most appropriately we can utilise the overseas aid resources that are available so I am grateful to you for making that point, the High Commissioner will have taken note of it and it can be a subject of discussion at the end of the month.

  • Mr Major’s Briefing en route to Calcutta – 8 January 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s on the record briefing en route to Calcutta, on Wednesday 8th January 1997.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    I don’t want to take your time for more than a second. Just really to say that I hope you will enjoy the trip, you know where we are going, I think Jonathan has taken you in detail through the agenda, so I won’t traipse through all that again.

    The genesis of this visit was a meeting I had with the Confederation of Indian Industry at Downing Street last summer, June/July, I forget precisely when it was, it was the day that Ganguly was taking a very large 100 off England at Lords, I can tell you that, but I can’t remember the exact date. And they invited me to come and address their main event of the year, which will be their seminar on Thursday afternoon, when I hope to deliver a fairly substantial speech, largely about international trade, markets and business-related matters.

    When they invited me to come, and I accepted, it seemed a suitable opportunity to bring with us a business delegation and I think you have seen the size and composition of the business delegation.

    It isn’t the biggest ever to leave the United Kingdom, but it is probably as high powered as any that has ever left the United Kingdom, I think Ian Lang and Michael Heseltine have both taken larger numbers of businessmen but I don’t think there has been a better quality in terms of seniority of British businessmen travelling abroad on a single trip in the past.

    This isn’t a trip to look for short term contracts. There will be quite a few contracts signed when we first get there, but they are not the product particularly of this visit, they are the product of a great deal of work over the last few months. The businessmen who are here are largely here looking for long term contracts. The Indians are extremely good to do business with, but contracts don’t get signed and sealed in a day, so they will be here as part of a long term relationship with India and I hope we will be able to open a few doors for them that otherwise might have remained closed. Certainly we are discussing with some of the businessmen the sort of things that we can do that might be helpful for them.

    While we are here also we will take an opportunity of looking at some of the aid projects. We want to look at some of the drug liaison effort that is going on, that is one of the principal reasons for going to the Khyber Pass, apart from its historical significance, and a chance for seeing the Khyber Rifles. So hope it will be both a worthwhile and an interesting trip.

    We are going on also to Bangladesh, I have never visited Bangladesh before, and on to Pakistan. In each of the three countries the purpose of the visit is predominantly trade, perhaps a little less so in Bangladesh, but certainly a trade interest in Bangladesh as well.

    I don’t think there is really much more I wish to say at the outset. If you have any questions on business-related matters, or the visit, I will happily try and answer them, or pass them on to Ian if they fall into his bailiwick.

    What I would just suggest in conclusion, if it appeals to any of you. I suggest when we have finished this brief discussion that we might go a little back in the plane and have a glass of champagne, or two, and we will try and persuade the businessmen to come and join us and you will be able to get a feel perhaps from them if you wish to of the advantages that they see of the visit.

     

    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

    QUESTION:

    There were a couple of pieces in the paper today about how tense the situation is in Pakistan. Is it your plan to see Benazir Bhutto and obviously people are going to ask would you be willing to meet Imran Khan if he was available?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I don’t think there are any plans for me to meet Imran Khan, though I have met him before in the past of course. I know Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto quite well, we have met many times in the past, and I think it is highly likely I will see both of them. I should add that I don’t intend to get involved in internal Pakistani domestic politics, but I have known both of them of old, it would be extremely odd if I didn’t meet them.

    QUESTION:

    A few question marks have been raised about the fact that you should be going abroad when there is so much happening at home and the election campaign is under way. Do you think that it is a bit odd to leave things without you in charge while so much is going on?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think helping our trade effort abroad is quite important as well. The election is important when it comes in due course but the normal activities of government have to go on in the interim. And here we have the 50th anniversary of Independence in India, I think that is a pretty significant event in India and it is a pretty significant event as far as the United Kingdom are concerned too, so I certainly wish to mark the beginning of that with a visit, and of course the trading interest which continues.

    So I think it is quite right. Government and the normal activities of government have to proceed. The election is important, it will come in due course, but it doesn’t dominate or eliminate all other activities in government, I think it is quite right to come.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 17 December 1990

    The text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 17th December 1990.


    PRIME MINISTER:
    Government Objectives

    Mr. Sayeed : To ask the Prime Minister what are the objectives of Her Majesty’s Government for the rest of this Parliament.

    The Prime Minister : The Government’s objectives remain to carry forward the programme outlined in the Queen’s Speech, Official Report, 7 November 1990, columns 4-6.
    Poland

    Mr. Alex Carlile : To ask the Prime Minister if he will hold an early meeting with the president of Poland; and if he will make a statement on British-Poland relations.

    The Prime Minister : I certainly hope to meet the Polish President– whose election I warmly welcome – before too long. No date has yet been fixed. Our bilateral relations with Poland are excellent. We hope that President Walesa will maintain the IMF-backed economic reform programme, which is vital to Poland’s future prosperity. We will continue to give substantial help to ease the transition to democracy and a market-based economy.

    Terrorism

    Mr. Hunter : To ask the Prime Minister how many people have been killed and how many injured (a) in Great Britain and (b) in Northern Ireland as a result of terrorist activity each month since May 1988.

    The Prime Minister : The information is given in the tables.

    (a) Great Britain

    |Deaths |Injuries
    ————————————-
    1988
    May |0 |0
    June |0 |0
    July |0 |0
    August |1 |8
    September |0 |0
    October |0 |0
    November |0 |0
    December |270 |<1>5

    1989
    January |0 |0
    February |0 |1
    March |0 |0
    April |0 |0
    May |0 |0
    June |0 |0
    July |0 |0
    August |0 |0
    September |11 |16
    October |0 |0
    November |0 |2
    December |0 |0

    1990
    January |0 |0
    February |0 |2
    March |0 |0
    April |0 |0
    May |1 |9
    June |1 |41
    July |1 |0
    August |0 |0
    September |0 |4
    October |0 |0
    November |0 |0
    December |0 |0

    <1> The figures for December 1988 result from the Lockerbie incident. All other figures result from terrorist activity connected with the affairs of Northern Ireland.
    (b) Northern Ireland

    |Deaths |Injuries
    ————————————-
    1988
    May |5 |90
    June |9 |64
    July |11 |67
    August |26 |159
    September |4 |117
    October |8 |67
    November |4 |67
    December |2 |56

    1989
    January |3 |49
    February |10 |64
    March |12 |61
    April |4 |102
    May |3 |103
    June |4 |91
    July |5 |99
    August |2 |109
    September |3 |56
    October |5 |76
    November |9 |60
    December |2 |89

    1990
    January |8 |70
    February |0 |122
    March |6 |66
    April |9 |54
    May |1 |84
    June |5 |59
    July |8 |111
    August |1 |71
    September |6 |77
    October |19 |<1>-
    November |9 |<1>-

    <1> These figures are not yet available.

    Advertising

    Mr. Michael : To ask the Prime Minister whether he will review the percentage increase in the expenditure on advertising in the press, television and other forms of publicity in each Department of state in the last five years and institute an inquiry into the reasons for any departmental increases which are in excess of the rate of inflation over the period.

    The Prime Minister : Expenditure on advertising in the press, television and other forms of publicity is a matter for departmental Ministers within the Government conventions on the use of paid publicity and advertising.

    Downing Street

    Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Prime Minister if he has any plans to re-establish the public right of way through Downing Street.

    The Prime Minister : Access to Downing Street has been controlled for security reasons for many years. This does not stop the many people who come to Downing Street for meetings, receptions or to present petitions.

    Bangladesh

    Mr. Madden : To ask the Prime Minister what message he has sent to the newly appointed President of Bangladesh; if he will place the text of any messages in the Library; and if he will make a statement about relations between Her Majesty’s Government and the Government of Bangladesh.

    The Prime Minister : My right hon Friend the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary sent a message of good wishes to the acting President, Mr. Justice Shahabuddin Ahmed and looks forward to working with the new interim Government of Bangladesh to reinforce the friendly relations which already exist between our two countries.
    Opinion Surveys

    Mr. Dobson : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list any opinion surveys conducted by, for or on behalf of the Cabinet Office and Management and Personnel Office since 1 January 1985 giving the date and purpose of each survey.

    The Prime Minister : This information is not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost.