Tag: Brazil

  • Mr Major’s Speech to the Link Into Latin America Conference – 10 February 1997

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech to the Link Into Latin America Conference, held at the Banqueting Hall in London on 10th February 1997.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Chairmen, Presidents, Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Let me first welcome you to the Conference.

    It’s a particular pleasure to share this platform with President Cardoso, President Fujimori and President Perez Balladares.

    President Cardoso was here a couple of years ago for the VE Day celebrations. It is good to see him back in London again. I look forward to his State Visit this autumn.

    I am delighted also the President Fujimori felt able to come today. I know how much time he has devoted personally to the siege in Lima. He has the support of us all in his efforts to bring that crisis to a successful and peaceful conclusion.

    And last, but not least, President Perez Balladares is here to represent Central America; and to remind us that Panama is the gateway of the Americas. He too is most welcome.

    The history of Britain’s relationship with Latin America is long and deep. But I don’t intend to dwell on it today. Instead, I would like to talk about today’s Britain. About today’s Latin America. And about how we can work together.

    So what is modern Britain like?

    – Britain today has a growing economy. We are now into our fifth year of sustained growth, at historically high levels;

    – we have falling unemployment: just 6.7%; one of the lowest rates in Europe. In the last four years we have created 900,000 extra jobs – more than France, Germany, Spain and Italy combined;

    – and we have near stable prices: inflation has been below 4% for over four years. The high inflation seen during the 1970s is a thing of the past.

    Behind these figures lies a fundamental transformation in the British economy.

    We have reduced the state’s role, through a controversial but highly successful privatisation programme.

    We believe private capital should predominantly drive the economy.

    We have reduced the state’s burden on business by a policy of deregulation.

    We are freeing companies from unnecessary red tape.

    And we have revolutionised industrial relations. The result: a modern, dynamic economy with a highly-skilled workforce.

    This isn’t just my view. Britain is increasingly seen around the world as the place to do business.

    – we receive more inward direct investment then anyone bar the US;

    – there are more foreign banks in London than in any other city in the world;

    – and we have the world’s largest foreign exchange market, with over 30% of global turnover.

    It is well known that Britain receives 40% of all American and Japanese investment coming to the EU. But I think it just as significant that we also get over one third of the investment from the rest of the world, including Latin America. For example:

    – Petrobas of Brazil has invested 130 million pounds in North Sea oil exploration;

    – Tenenge, another Brazilian company, has invested a further 100 million pounds;

    – and over 20 Latin American banks are represented in London.

    We don’t attract so much foreign investment by chance. It is the direct result of our policies:

    – Britain has a flexible labour market;

    – we have not weighed ourselves down the burdens of the EU Social Model – non-wage costs for employers in the UK are about half or less the costs in Germany, France or Italy;

    – we have a highly skilled and motivated workforce;

    – and we are part of the European Union’s single market – a market of over 300 million consumers.

    I know that a number of Trade and Economic Ministers from Latin America are here at the Conference today.

    I hope they will tell their businessmen back home about Britain today. Tell them that it is a place to do business. A place to invest in. And a natural gateway to the European market. And tell them they are welcome here.

    Enough about Britain.

    I am sure the three Presidents, and others, will speak more eloquently and originally than I can about today’s Latin America. But let me give you my perspective nonetheless.

    Latin America has made remarkable advances in the last decade:

    – democracy has been consolidated throughout the continent;

    – there is peace in Central America;

    – free market economic policies are the rule rather than the exception;

    – hyper-inflation has all but disappeared;

    – and there has been large-scale privatisation.

    I am glad to see so many British businessmen here today. I know that some of you have been doing business with Latin America for many years. To take just a few examples:

    – ICI are now the leading paints and coatings company in Latin America after their purchase of Bunge Paints of Brazil last year;

    – Shell are developing the Camisea gas field in Peru, which could lead to contracts worth nearly one billion US dollars;

    – British Gas have a major holding in Metrogas, distributing gas to Buenos Aires; and are also developing a 1.8 billion US dollar pipeline between Brazil and Bolivia;

    – and RTZ have significant mining interests throughout Latin America including 600 million US dollars invested in a copper mine in Chile, over 200 million US dollars at a nickel mining complex in Brazil and mines in Argentina, Bolivia and Colombia.

    Other British businessmen here may be looking at the region for the first time. You are right to do so. The House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee recently produced an excellent report on the UK’s links with Latin America. The Committee noted:

    – that Brazil’s GDP is of the same order of magnitude as China’s and 50% larger than India’s;

    – that the Argentine province of Cordoba alone has a GDP equal to that of Bulgaria;

    – and that Mexico is one of the most important trading economies in the world, with imports and exports worth over 100 billion pounds in 1995.

    I am pleased to see that members of the Committee are here today.

    Perhaps even more strikingly:

    – the World Bank expects annual growth in Latin America in the next ten years to be the highest in the world after south-east Asia;

    – over 2,000 Latin American enterprises have been privatised since 1985. Between 1993 and 1995 alone privatisations in Latin American brought in over 10 billion US dollars;

    – the average inflation rate in Latin America has fallen from 340% in 1994 to around 25%;

    – and trade between the four countries of Mercosur has more than doubled in the last five years. It is now worth over 12 billion US dollars a year.

    Today, Latin American is one of the fastest growing, most dynamic regions in the world. This is the message the British businessmen here should take back to their boardrooms.

    I have told you about “Modern Britain”. I have described today’s Latin America. How can we come together?

    Clearly, we can trade with each other; and we can invest in each other. To our mutual advantage.

    But there is much more to it than that. Britain and Latin America need a modern relationship. A relationship that goes beyond bilateral trade and investment.

    We must deepen our political ties. As a trading nation, Britain has always had a global outlook. Our membership of the Security Council, the European Union, the Commonwealth and the G7 ensure that we continue to do so.

    Latin America’s voice in the world, often muted in the past, or drowned out by the shouts of others, is increasingly being heard. We share a common view of the world. Latin American’s horizon is increasingly ours: a global horizon.

    Peacekeeping is just one example. British and Argentine troops work side by side in Cyprus. They now have an Argentine commander – appointed by the UN with British support. There are Brazilians in Angola; Uruguayans in Tajikistan. I welcome Latin America’s willingness to play its part in tackling such international problems.

    We must continue to develop the habit of working closely together on world issues: the habit of consulting, discussing and debating the issues of the day until this becomes second nature.

    We will not agree on every issue. But the more we understand each others’ points of view, the more we will be able to find common solutions to common problems. I am certainly looking forward to my talks with Presidents Fujimori, Cardoso and Perez Balladares later today.

    We must also strengthen our joint efforts to combat drug trafficking, international crime and terrorism.

    We must work together to solve the world’s environmental problems.

    I attended the Rio Earth Summit five years ago. It marked a turning point in global collaboration on the environment. Old arguments that the developed world used environmental concerns to hold back the developing world are no longer heard. All have accepted the need for sustainable development.

    Since then, we have collaborated very closely with Latin America on environmental issues – through our aid programme, and our educational and scientific links. I very much look forward to the UN Special Session in June, to review progress and set a new environmental agenda for the years ahead.

    Finally, we must work together to achieve freer world trade. Latin America and the European Union have a big role to play to pushing forward global liberalisation. We must co-operate in the WTO to ensure that we build on the success of the Uruguay Round. My aim to completely free trade by the year 2020. I hope this will also be Latin American’s aim.

    In the European Union, Britain has pushed for the best possible deal to boost trade in both directions. We have argued for Chile and MERCOSUR to be given greater access to European markets, just as we expect greater access to Latin American markets.

    And we are pressing for the Union to take a forward position in negotiations with Mexico. Both sides must lower constraints and barriers so that we all get a better deal.

    My good friend Tristan would like us to be brief. I will be so. But let me leave you with one final thought. We should not look back at Britain’s relations with Latin America one hundred years ago, or fifty years ago, or even ten years ago. Let us instead look to the future. Look at how we can increase our co-operation, our trade, our investment, our joint endeavours – and build a modern partnership.

    The advantages of doing so are there to be had. And they are very real. I hope we will have the good sense – and the self interest – to take them.

  • PMQT – 6 July 1993

    Below is the text of Prime Minister’s Question Time from 6th July 1993. Tony Newton responded on behalf of John Major.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Engagements

    Q1. Mr. Dykes : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    The Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Tony Newton) : I have been asked to reply.

    My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister is attending the G7 economic summit in Tokyo.

    Mr. Dykes : Will my right hon. Friend assure the House that Her Majesty’s Government and our leading partners will exert maximum pressure on the Japanese to open their markets to imports of all kinds and to the sort of free trade that is now developing rapidly in the European single market?

    Mr. Newton : My hon. Friend is absolutely right to emphasise that. One of the key aims of the G7 summit will be to agree on measures that can help to further the recovery of the world economy, including the maintenance and sustenance of free and competitive trade. My right hon. Friend’s aim will include very much ensuring that sufficient progress is made on the market access and services package to permit early resumption of the multilateral negotiations in Geneva and bring a successful conclusion to the Uruguay round.

    Mrs. Beckett : Is the Lord President aware that, last night in another place, his ministerial colleagues said that the defeat that the Government suffered on the Railways Bill struck at the heart of that legislation? Does he agree?

    Mr. Newton : My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Transport has made it clear that the Government have set out and seen accepted in this place their arguments on this matter and he will take a lot of persuading to believe that the policy should be changed. Nevertheless, the other place has asked for reconsideration and, of course, we will carefully consider the points that have been made.

    Mrs. Beckett : Is it not crazy that the French, the Germans or the Italians will be able to run trains on British railways and the only people who will not are British Rail? Why do the Government not show some common sense and simply admit that they have got it wrong?

    Mr. Newton : The right hon. Lady and her right hon. and hon. Friends have fought every privatisation for 12 or 14 years. As one by one the privatisations have proved successful, they have been forced to abandon most of that. The people who need to learn the lessons are Her Majesty’s Opposition.

    Mr. Mark Robinson : Is my right hon. Friend aware that the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders has published figures today showing an 11 per cent. increase in new care sales over June 1992? Is that not further evidence that the recovery is being sustained?

    Mr. Newton : Yes, indeed. My hon. Friend has described exactly the figures published this morning by the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. What is more, the SMMT goes on to say that recovery in the new car market in all but three of the past 15 months is now clearly established. That comes alongside all the other evidence that we have seen– manufacturing output up, car output up, exports up and unemployment down.

     

    Q2. Mr. Bradley : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Bradley : Does the Leader of the House recall that on 29 October 1987, less than six years ago, as the then Minister for Health, he proudly came to my constituency to open the Duchess of York children’s hospital? Is he aware that, last week, South Manchester health authority confirmed its plan to close that purpose-built children’s hospital despite overwhelming opposition?

    Will the right hon. Gentleman tell the House whether he supports the all- party campaign, which has overwhelming public support, to keep open our children’s hospital, or will he accept the invitation which is on the way to him, to return to Manchester, to close that hospital on behalf of the Government?

    Mr. Newton : I well remember the occasion to which the hon. Gentleman refers, although I have to say that the hospital was not opened by me but by the Duchess of York. I am aware that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health is considering the proposal, but the hon. Gentleman knows that it will be subject to full public consultation. My right hon. Friend will make her decision in due course.

     

    Q3. Dr. Spink : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Dr. Spink : Does my right hon. Friend agree that political parties should not sell the right to choose their leaders or decide their policies? Can he confirm that the Conservative party remains committed to one man, one vote?

    Mr. Newton rose– [Interruption.]

    Madam Speaker : Order. The activities of political parties are not a subject for Prime Minister’s Question Time. The hon. Member for Castle Point (Dr. Spink) must question the Government about their policies. It is Government policy in which we are interested. Mr. Newton rose– —

    Hon. Members : No.

    Madam Speaker : Order. The Leader of the House has been with us a long time and he is a respected man in this place. I am sure that he has an appropriate reply.

    Mr. Newton : I was going to say that I think that my hon. Friend the Member for Castle Point (Dr. Spink) was asking about the Government’s attitude to such matters. [Interruption.] I think that that question is entirely right. I have read with great interest the press reports of recent days, starting with that about the right hon. and learned Member for Monklands, East (Mr. Smith), who said that he was going to have a confrontation with the unions, and followed by the comments of the right hon. Member for Derby, South (Mrs. Beckett), who said that she was looking for compromise. I just wonder when we shall have the climbdown and capitulation.

     

    Q4. Mr. Heppell : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Heppell : Is the Leader of the House aware that 405 former council properties are empty in the city of Nottingham and that 80 of them have already been vandalised, when 350 households have been designated as statutorily homeless and another 104 families live in conditions that are statutorily overcrowded? Does the Leader of the House not believe that it is time that the Government took a compassionate and humanitarian view and allowed the city council to spend some of the £53 million that it has amassed from the sale of council houses to put roofs over those people’s heads?

    Mr. Newton : The hon. Gentleman will know that, at this period of time, Nottingham city council–in common with others–has full freedom to spend capital receipts. It can also take advantage– [Interruption.] It may spend capital receipts generated at this time. It also has access to the full range of measures that my right hon. and hon. Friends have introduced to assist the housing market.

    Mr. John Greenway : Will my right hon. Friend join me in congratulating Viscount Runciman and his colleagues on the report of the Royal Commission on criminal justice, which has been published today? Although many of its recommendations will require a great deal of thought and consideration, does my right hon. Friend agree that some improvements in our criminal justice system are desirable not just to protect the innocent but to ensure that the guilty are properly convicted?

    Hon. Members : Hear, hear.

    Mr. Newton : It is obvious from the response of my right hon. and hon. Friends–and, I suspect, a good deal of sympathy from the Opposition– that there is a wide welcome for the report that has been published today by the Royal Commission on criminal justice. There will no doubt be differences of opinion about some of the report’s conclusions, but the importance of that matter is undoubted. The contribution that the royal commission has made to the debate on those matters is undoubted and the Government will give its recommendations the most careful consideration and then come to conclusions about what to do.

     

    Q5. Mr. Tyler : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Tyler : Is the Lord President aware that the Prime Minister visited north Cornwall exactly five months ago today and promised my constituents that he was taking action on excessive water and sewerage charges? Will he confirm whether it is the Government’s policy to renege on existing environmental obligations or does he intend to break that promise?

    Mr. Newton : The hon. Gentleman is right to refer to my right hon. Friend’s visit to the south-west and to his recognition of the concern felt in the south-west, and much expressed by my hon. Friends, about the level of water charges. My right hon. Friends have been actively examining the options for reducing the increase in charges and, particularly, phasing in the burdens of the waste water directive in a way that would help. That consideration is going on at the moment.

     

    Q6. Dr. Michael Clark : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Dr. Clark : Does my right hon. Friend agree with Senator Campos, who is currently leading a Brazilian Inter-Parliamentary Union delegation to Westminster, when he said last night that Brazil is not just a country of the future, nor Britain just a country of the past, but that both are countries for today? Is that not best illustrated by the figures for Jaguar cars, which show that output has gone up 46 per cent., exports to Germany and the United States by 20 per cent., and that confidence in that company is greater than for many years.

    Mr. Newton : I acknowledge my hon. Friend’s interest in Brazil and echo the welcome that he has given to the visitors who are here from that country. I join him also in hoping that they may boost Jaguar car sales still further by taking some back with them. Meanwhile, I endorse my hon. Friend’s pleasure at the British motor industry in accelerating away from its European competitors and links with the figures from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders that we were discussing earlier.

    Ms Abbott : If the Government are really concerned about single mothers on benefit, when will they bring forward a strategy for child care? Is the Minister aware that most women on benefit would dearly like to go out to work and be independent but that their main problem is child care? When will the Government understand that investment in child care would be an investment in growth in general, and the surest and most humane way to get women off social security?

    Mr. Newton : The hon. Lady will be familiar with the increase in pre -school provision of all kinds in recent years. She will also be well aware that at least as important a part of a policy in the area with which she is concerned are those policies for the improved collection and enforcement of child maintenance represented by the Child Support Agency, now getting successfully under way.

     

    Q7. Mr. Haselhurst : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Tuesday 6 July.

    Mr. Newton : I have been asked to reply.

    I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave some moments ago.

    Mr. Haselhurst : Is it correct to say that my right hon. Friend’s colleagues in the Department of Trade and Industry have secured a further £2 billion of help from European Community structural funds to help two of the most disadvantaged areas of the United Kingdom? If so, is that not proof of the merits of working vigorously and whole-heartedly within the Community, rather than constantly fretting about our relationship with it?

    Mr. Newton : My hon. Friend is absolutely right. Indeed, the whole House will wish to pay tribute to the Minister for Industry on his negotiating success in the Community at the end of last week. He succeeded in reaching an agreement which will extend objective 1 status under the structural fund to Merseyside and to the Highlands and Islands enterprise area, and to the areas Argyll, Bute and West Moray which were not proposed by the Commission. That agreement is likely to bring about £2.25 billion to the United Kingdom over the next six years, to all its objective 1 areas, including Northern Ireland.

    Mr. Bryan Davies : With regard to political contributions, why is it all one way? What incentives do the Government give to rich Britons to make political contributions to right-wing regimes abroad, or does the whole idea stink?

    Mr. Newton : As I may possibly have said on some previous occasion, I will listen to lectures from such as the hon. Gentleman on that matter when we stop facing the prospect of a position in the Labour party where it will be one man, 2 million votes.