The Rt. Hon. Sir John Major KG CH

Tag: Child Benefit

  • PMQT Written Answers – 11 November 1991

    Below is the text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 11th November 1991.

    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Irish Republic (Legislation)

    Mr. Stanbrook : To ask the Prime Minister in how many cases proceedings in the Irish Republic under their Criminal Law (Jurisdiction) Act 1976 have been requested by United Kingdom prosecuting authorities since 1976; in how many cases proceedings in the United Kingdom under the Criminal Jurisdiction Act 1975 have been requested by prosecuting authorities in the Irish Republic since 1975; and if he will make a statement on this reciprocal legislation.

    The Prime Minister : Since 1976 there have been 32 applications by the United Kingdom prosecuting authorities for proceedings in the republic under the 1976 Act. There have been no applications from the prosecuting authorities in the republic under the 1975 Act, but 18 persons have been prosecuted in the United Kingdom under that Act for offences allegedly committed in the republic.

     

    Voice

    Mr. Fraser : To ask the Prime Minister if he will place in the Library a copy of his reply to a letter to him from “Voice” dated 11 October.

    The Prime Minister : No. It is not my normal practice to do so.

     

    Political Advisers

    Mr. Allen : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his reply of 5 November columns 42-43 about political advisers to Ministers, whether any of the individuals work for Ministers of lower rank than Secretary of State or equivalent.

    The Prime Minister : Yes. Six do so.

    Mr. Allen : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his reply of 5 November columns 42-43 about political advisers, whether there is any limit on the number of political advisers who can be appointed by individual Ministers.

    The Prime Minister : My approval is required for the appointment of all special advisers.

    Mr. Allen : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his reply of 5 November, columns 42-3, about political advisers to Ministers, if he will list the names of the individuals concerned.

    The Prime Minister : The names of the special advisers (political) currently serving are as follows :

    Mr. K. Adams

    Mr. L. Anisfield

    Mr. E. Bickham

    Mr. G. Black

    Ms. A. Broom

    Ms. L. Campey

    Mr. T. Collins

    Mr. M. Fraser

    Mr. J. R. M. Gardner

    Mr. C. M. Grantham

    Mr. H. Harris-Hughes

    Mr. J. Hill

    Mrs. S. Hogg

    Ms. S. Hole

    Mr. A. Kemp (part-time)

    Mr. T. Kerpel

    Mrs. T. Keswick

    Mrs. E. Laing

    Mr. W. Lightfoot

    Mr. R. Marsh

    Mr. J. Mayhew

    Ms. S. McEwen

    Mr. P. Miller

    Mr. P. Moman

    Mrs. K. Ramsay (part-time)

    Dr. W. Robinson

    Mr. A. Rosling

    Mr. A. Ross-Goobey

    Mr. D. Ruffley

    Mr. I. Stewart

    Lady Strathnaver

    Mr. N. True

    Miss B. Wallis (part-time)

    Mr. A. Young

     

    Civil Service (Sexual Harassment)

    Mr. Cox : To ask the Prime Minister if he will develop a female contact point in the civil service management structure where women can seek guidance when suffering from sexual harassment.

    The Prime Minister : The civil service is committed to providing a working environment which is free of harassment for all staff. Departments and agencies are advised to ensure that women who feel that they have been subjected to sexual harassment are able to go to a woman officer for advice and support in dealing with the problem. In many departments and agencies there are specially designated women officers to contact in case of sexual harassment. Specific training is available for those dealing with complaints of sexual harassment.

     

    Single Parents

    Mr. Battle : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list all Government policy initiatives taken since 1987 which aim to assist single parents.

    The Prime Minister : The information is set out in the table.

    Policy initiatives taken since 1987 to assist lone parents

    Department / Date |Policy initiative

    —————————————————————————————————————————————–

    Employment (September 1988) | Lone parents who have been in receipt of Income Support for at least 26 weeks may enter Employment Training even if they do not meet the usual eligibility criteria.

    Health (Since 1987) | The National Council for One Parent Families and Gingerbread have received over £1 million in core grants.

    Health (Since 1987-88) | Gingerbread has received a total of £90,000 for its local groups from the Department’s under fives small grants scheme.

    Health (Early 1988) | Over £1 million of the RPI error monies was spent by 10 voluntary organisations on many different projects for lone parents.

    Health (Since 1989-90) | The second Under Fives Initiative includes 4 local projects, costing in all over £300,000, to help understand better the effect of childcare services on the economic circumstances of lone parents.

    Home Office | In the Maintenance Enforcement Act 1991 |1991 the Government has given courts additional powers to enforce the payment of maintenance which will help to ensure that single parents receive the monies to which they are entitled. The Act will be implemented in spring 1992.

    Lord Chancellor’s | Single Parents can benefit from the new 1989 |orders provided under the Children Act 1989. One of the Act’s main principles is that parents should, wherever possible, come to an agreement about the future of their children without the intervention of the court. The Act also gives unmarried fathers the chance to apply for formal parental responsibility for their children.

    Social Security | The structure of personal allowances in April 1988 |Income Support provide that all lone parents aged 18 or over receive the full adult rate of benefit, normally only available from age 25. The Income Support lone parent premium is paid on top of the family premium to those lone parents who do not qualify for another type of premium. Income Support earnings disregard is £15 a week for lone parents, compared with a £5 disregard for most single people. Family Credit introduced: a much more generous scheme for all low income families than the Family Income Supplement scheme. In Family Credit lone parents get the same adult credit as two parent families. One Parent Benefit is ignored when calculating entitlement to Family Credit. Higher levels of lone parent premium in Housing Benefit and Community Charge Benefit. Housing Benefit and Community Charge Benefit rules for lone parents generally aligned with those in Income Support. October 1989 | Lone parents under 18 who have to live away from home entitled to the over 18 rate of Income Support personal allowance. April 1990 | Lone parent premium in Housing Benefit and Community Charge Benefit increased. October 1990 | Earnings disregard for those lone parents not on Income Support but receiving Housing Benefit or Community Charge Benefit increased from £15 to £25 a week.

    Planned for April 1992 | Reduction in qualifying hours rule in Family Credit from 24 to 16 hours a week. Corresponding change in Income Support. Introduction of £15 maintenance disregard in Family Credit, Disability Working Allowance, Housing Benefit and Community Charge Benefit. Child Support Unit Becomes operational and takes on existing liable relative work in preparation for the establishment of the Child Support Agency. Planned for | Child Support Agency becomes operation- Spring 1993 |al. The Agency will trace absent parents, assess, collect and review child maintenance, and ensure that payments are made regularly.

    Welsh Office | Gingerbread is helped through the Support for Child and Family Services’ grant scheme. 1991-92 | A total of £24,440 has been awarded toGingerbread to meet part of the costs of their Swansea office and of a development officer in North Wales.

     

    Disabled People

    Mr. Alfred Morris : To ask the Prime Minister if he will make the European Community’s policy for disabled people one of his priorities at the Maastricht summit.

    The Prime Minister : We believe that existing provisions for disabled people at the European level are satisfactory. In addition, a number of new proposals relating to disabled people are under consideration.

     

    London Government

    Mr. Tracey : To ask the Prime Minister how many representations he has received calling for a directly elected council for the London conurbation; and if he will make a statement.

    The Prime Minister : As far as I am aware none, although my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment has received a dozen or so, mostly in response to consultation on the review of local government outside London and the metropolitan counties. I am aware that the main opposition parties and the Association of London Authorities want to recreate a Greater London council in all but name. I have no plans for changing the basic structure of local government in London.

     

    Child Benefit

    Mr. Meacher : To ask the Prime Minister if he will make it his policy not to allow names and addresses of child benefit claimants to be sold or passed on outside the Department of Social Security.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 8 November 1991] : It is Government policy that all personal information, including names and addresses, held in social security records should be regarded as confidential and should not normally be disclosed to a third party without the consent of the person concerned. Information may normally be disclosed without consent to assist the police in the investigation of a serious crime; to meet the welfare needs of the individual concerned; to meet statutory requirements, for example, to other Government Departments or organisations which act as agents of the DSS in paying benefit; and to prevent the duplication of payments from public funds. We have no plans to change this policy.

     

    Executive Agencies

    Mr. Flynn : To ask the Prime Minister what changes have been made in the arrangements regarding the sending of letters from chief executives of executive agencies to hon. Members in response to parliamentary questions when the House is not sitting.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 8 November 1991] : The aim of the arrangements for chief executives to write direct to hon. Members is to ensure that the replies are full, prompt and as helpful as possible. It is for individual Ministers to determine how they will achieve this, including when the House is not sitting.

    Mr. Meacher : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list each Department and each executive agency which employs its target quota of people with disabilities.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 8 November 1991] : All departments and agencies work to increase opportunities for people with disabilities, whether registered or unregistered, under a civil service code of practice on the employment of people with disabilities. The civil service compares favourably with the private sector and in 1990 six departments and agencies exceeded a 3 per cent. level of staff registered as disabled. The Government will continue to seek to ensure that disabled people have opportunities for employment in departments and agencies which are at least as good as those of able bodied people.

     

    Offensive Odours (Cardiff)

    Mr. Morgan : To ask the Prime Minister what consultations he has had concerning the Butetown main foul sewer and offensive odours in the area of the Cardiff bay pierhead broadwalk.

    The Prime Minister [holding answer 8 November 1991] : During my visit to Cardiff bay on 20 September the problem was raised by local residents.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Child Benefit – 25 October 1990

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Child Benefit on 25th October 1990.

    Mr. Ray Powell To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he last met representatives from the Trade Union Congress to discuss child benefit.

    Mr. Major I have not met representatives of the TUC to discuss child benefit.

  • Mr Major’s Written Parliamentary Answer on Child Benefit – 5 June 1990

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s written Parliamentary Answer on Child Benefit on 5th June 1990.

    Sir Ian Gilmour To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many working families with children receive more in child benefit than they pay in income tax, distinguishing between two and one-parent families.

    Mr. Major In 1990–91 an estimated 900,000 families with heads in full or part-time employment will receive more in child benefit than they pay in income tax. Almost half the families have insufficient income to be liable to income tax. A total of 600,000 are two-parent families and 300,000 are single parents. Estimates are based on a projection of the 1987 family expenditure survey and are subject to revision.

  • Mr Major’s Written Question on Child Benefit – 22 January 1981

    The text of Mr Major’s Parliamentary written question on Child Benefit, published on 22nd January 1981.

    Mr. Major Asked the Secretary of State for Social Services whether his Department has completed its review of the take-up of child benefit increase; and if he will make a statement.

    Mrs. Chalker Based on the latest available figures (November 1979), it is estimated that take-up remains at about 60 per cent. of those who stand to gain by claiming child benefit increase – the premium, worth £3 per week, paid to one-parent families.

    This is a disappointing conclusion, since a wide variety of measures are taken to bring CB(I) to the attention of lone parents including a number introduced during the last year. Nevertheless, on 26 November 1980 there were 438,000 recipients of CB(I), with some 10,000 new claims a month over recent months. This compares with 377,000 recipients on 28 November 1979 and 306,000 on 1 December 1978. I hope that the increase in numbers indicates that publicity measures are increasingly effective.

    Having reviewed the position, my right hon. Friend has decided that a change of name should be made to bring CB(I) to the attention of potential beneficiaries. We propose, therefore, to change the name from “Child Benefit Increase” to “One Parent Benefit”. The change will take place in April 1981 by which time the necessary changes to forms, leaflets and order books etc. should have been made. I hope this change will make it clear that the extra £3 per week is for lone parents, and that they will realise more readily that they may be entitled to the benefit, and should claim it.

    A further stimulus will be provided by the recently published Green Paper on the taxation of husband and wife, which is expected to give rise to much public discussion. Chapter 9 of the Green Paper discusses the question of whether the additional personal tax allowance (APA) for lone parents should be converted into a cash benefit in the form of a higher rate of child benefit increase. This will naturally help to focus additional attention on child benefit increase.

    I shall keep the take-up of CB(I) under review. Any further initiatives, to publicise the benefit will be considered in the light of the response to the Green Paper discussion and of the subsequent decision as to whether or not to convert the APA into a cash benefit.