Tag: Foreign Aid

  • Mr Major’s Doorstep Interview in Harare – 17 October 1991

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s doorstep interview in Harare, held on 17th October 1991.


    QUESTION:

    Can we ask you why you felt it was necessary to threaten that Britain would go it alone in forgiving this debt?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I am not threatening anything at all, what I am saying is that there are a very large number of very poor countries out there and the Trinidad Terms initiative can help them to a greater extent than they have ever been helped before. And I want to push that snowball down the hill a little, that is what we are doing, it will make a material difference. What it will mean for really the poorest countries in the world is that they have some incentive to put their economy to rights and not see all the virtues of that disappear in debt relief.

    QUESTION:

    But is the initiative meeting resistance from other members of the Paris Club?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    No, I think the Paris Club will support it, it has been under discussion for some time and I think there will be general support for it. Immediately I announced it the Prime Minister of Canada announced that he would follow suit, the Australians have said they will look at it very carefully and I suspect others will too. I think it is very important that we actually get this initiative off the ground and the debt written off.

    QUESTION:

    Are you going to link this to human rights?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    The help we have proposed with the right offer of Trinidad Terms is related to a good IMF programme and the IMF themselves look at matters of that sort. So there is a natural link.

    QUESTION:

    How do you feel as a former bank manager wiping out 500 million pounds of British debt with one stroke of a pen?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I looked at it also from the point of view of the countries who are receiving the assistance. I think it is often very hard to get a proper perspective of what life is actually like in some of these countries. I do emphasise again that these are the very poorest countries in the world, the average income for people in these countries is about 400 pounds a year or less. The people with least income in those countries are therefore by definition very poor indeed and the best way to help them is to help their countries actually produce a better performance for the future. Removing the debt burden by writing it off seems to us to be the best way to help.

    QUESTION:

    Will this relieve starvation in the short or long term?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I do not think it will deal with the immediate food problems, no. I think what it does do is help countries put themselves in a better position to invest and to build up a secure economy of their own, it certainly does that but it will not remove the need for emergency help from time to time.

    QUESTION:

    Does this relieve you of increasing the foreign aid through the normal channels?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    We are in the middle of the public expenditure round and this is a separate matter from that, this is a write-off of debt. I think it is fail to remind people that it was the British government that first introduced Toronto Terms when Nigel Lawson was Chancellor, that was an innovation in its day and way ahead of what anyone else was even contemplating. We have now carried that a really very significant step forward with Trinidad Terms.

    QUESTION:

    What was the response from the other Commonwealth countries here apart from Canada?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    They welcomed it, the Australians have welcomed it. There has not been much time to talk to the others, there was a very warm response from the conference hall itself.

    QUESTION:

    What about from Mr Mugabe?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Mr Mugabe was particularly warm about it but you must ask him.

    QUESTION:

    Did you do this mainly for economic reasons or compassionate reasons?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think both. I do not think you can compartmentalise them, it is not a sudden idea that suddenly emerged from the top of our head.
    I floated the idea of Trinidad Terms and announced what our policy was at the Commonwealth Finance Ministers Meeting at Trinidad – hence the name – two years ago. Since then we have refined it. What it amounts to is a straightforward write-off of two-thirds of the debt of those countries. Now that is infinitely greater than anything that has been seen before. What has often happened in the past is that the developed countries have offered help but they have offered help by saying keep the debt, we will reduce the interest rate or we will roll over the date at which you pay it. And what that has effectively meant is that this huge amount of debt actually remains there and however much countries improve their own economy, as they improve their own economy they just run into this wall of debt that then has to be met.

    Now that is not a great incentive so I think the time has come when we actually offer them a clear-cut, practical and significant incentive so that they can see the improvements in their own country of improvements in their own economy and I think this will do that.

    QUESTION:

    Do you think your unilateral action today will shame others into joining you?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    It is not a question of shaming others, I am setting out what the British position is. I believe others will follow suit, the Canadians have already said they will, I would be surprised myself if that is not a fairly general reaction and I think it will be widely welcomed by people.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 26 April 1991

    Below is the text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 26th April 1991.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Overseas Aid

    Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Prime Minister how much extra would be needed each year for the United Kingdom to meet its United Nations target on overseas aid over the next five years.

    The Prime Minister : Under the public expenditure survey system, plans for expenditure on the aid programme have only been made up to 1993-94. Forecasts for nominal gross national product are available only to 1994-95. However, on present trends, to reach the United Nations target of 0.7 per cent. of GNP spent on official development assistance would require a total aid programme of some £5.2 billion in 1995-96, £3.3 billion greater than the presently planned aid programme for 1993-94.

    Press and Public Relations Staff

    Mr. Dobson : To ask the Prime Minister if he will give for each year from 1979-80, including 1991-92, the number of staff actually employed on 1 April and the full complement of staff, including vacant posts in the press and public relations office of the Prime Minister’s Office.

    The Prime Minister : Seven people including support staff were employed in 10 Downing Street on 1 April 1991 on press and public relations activities. There is one vacant post at present. Detailed figures were not recorded separately prior to 1987-88; since then the total staff complement has remained at eight. The complement for 1991-92 is eight.

  • PMQT Written Answers – 18 April 1991

    Below is the text of the written answers relating to Prime Minister’s Question Time from 18th April 1991.


    PRIME MINISTER:

     

    Overseas Aid

    Mr. Peter Bottomley : To ask the Prime Minister when the United Kingdom first agreed to give official overseas aid equivalent to 0.7 per cent. of annual income; and if he will list the amount in real terms and the percentage for each year since then.

    The Prime Minister : The United Nations target for official development assistance to developing countries of 0.7 per cent. of GNP was accepted in principle by the British Government in 1974, although no date was set for meeting it. The United Kingdom has provided net official development assistance since then as follows:

    Year |Net official |Official

    |development |development

    |assistance |assistance as

    |£ million |percentage of GNP

    |(1989 prices)

    ————————————————————————

    1974 |1,348 |0.36

    1975 |1,395 |0.38

    1976 |1,469 |0.39

    1977 |1,679 |0.44

    1978 |1,803 |0.45

    1979 |2,100 |0.51

    1980 |1,378 |0.34

    1981 |1,678 |0.42

    1982 |1,483 |0.37

    1983 |1,457 |0.35

    1984 |1,402 |0.33

    1985 |1,479 |0.33

    1986 |1,430 |0.31

    1987 |1,331 |0.28

    1988 |1,591 |0.32

    1989 |1,578 |0.31

     

    Engagements

    Mr. Harry Greenway : To ask the Prime Minister if he will list his official engagements for Thursday April 18.

    The Prime Minister : This morning I presided at a meeting of the Cabinet and had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House, I shall be having further meetings later today.

     

    East Timor

    Mrs. Mahon : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his answer of 18 March, Official Report, columns 3-4, on what considerations the Government based their decision not to recognise East Timor’s right to self-determination.

    The Prime Minister : The United Kingdom supported United Nations Security Council resolution 389 of 22 April 1976 which confirmed the right of the people of East Timor to self-determination. Since 1982 the United Kingdom, in company with most other member states of the European Community, has supported the efforts of the United Nations Secretary-General to promote discussions between Indonesia and Portugal with a view to reaching a solution acceptable to all parties.

    Mrs. Mahon : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his answer of 18 March, Official Report, columns 3-4, what guarantees he has received or what monitoring has been undertaken to ensure that Tornados sold to Indonesia have not and will not be used against the civil population of East Timor.

    The Prime Minister : There has been no sale of Tornado to Indonesia.

    Mrs. Mahon : To ask the Prime Minister what the Government are doing to promote United Nations resolution 35/27 of 1980 on East Timor’s right to independence.

    The Prime Minister : The United Kingdom abstained on United Nations resolution 35/27 of 1980. We took the view that by so doing, in company with most European Community partners and others, we could help to promote reconciliation and the search for a diplomatic solution by Indonesia and Portugal. Since 1982, the United Kingdom has supported the efforts of the United Nations Secretary-General to find a solution to the problem which is acceptable to all parties.

     

    Indonesia

    Mrs. Mahon : To ask the Prime Minister, further to his answer of 18 March, Official Report, columns 3-4, on what consideration the Government based their decision to recognise the right of Indonesia to self-determination.

    The Prime Minister : My earlier reply referred to the right of self- defence under international law. All states have the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence.