Author: admin

  • Mr Major’s Speech in Cape Town – 20 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech to the South African National Assembly, in Cape Town, on Tuesday 20th September 1994.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Madam Speaker and President of the Senate, President Mandela, Members of Parliament.

    It is 34 long years since the last visit to South Africa by a British Prime Minister. Madam Speaker, it is good to be back.

    This Parliament has been elected to embrace both the old and the new. To be here four months after South Africa’s rebirth is intensely moving, to rise and to speak in this building at this time is to sense the weight of history, I am privileged to be here. They have been long years for South Africa, years of isolation, years of hope deferred, years of potential unfulfilled.

    The policy of apartheid isolated South Africa, it isolated it from the West because it affronted democratic values, it isolated it in Africa because of its treatment of Africans and others, it isolated the government from its own people because it would not accept them as equals.

    And yet in another sense South Africa was never isolated, you were never forgotten, you were never out of our debates, you were never out of our affections. We knew that change had to come and when it came it came more rapidly, more comprehensively than we had dared to hope.

    Now South Africa is taking up her responsibilities, her responsibilities to herself, to her peoples, to the wider world. You have made a new beginning.

    Perhaps those of you who sit here in this change do not see perhaps with the perspective of the world the extent to which the world is watching what you have done and applauding the direction in which you are going. You are quite literally a source of hope to a whole continent.

    Today, as we approach the 200th anniversary of Britain’s old Cape colony, I have come here to re-awaken an old friendship, to hold out my hand to the new South Africa, to make a new beginning and to signal a new friendship between your country and mine.

    Mostly this afternoon I wish to look forward, I wish to look forward to see what the United Kingdom and South Africa can do for each other, for the progress we can make together, to our joint role in the Commonwealth of which we are both influential members, and to the contribution we can make both to Africa and to this country and to everywhere in Southern and Central Africa.

    But I also want to look back for a few moments. To make a new beginning we must first look the past in the eye. It is there in our hearts, it is there in our joint history, so let us be frank about what has united us and also about what has divided us.

    We British were relative late-comers to Africa, but in the 400 years since Sir Francis Drake’s epic voyage of 1580 we have been deeply involved with this continent. Trade rather than colonisation was the reason for early British and European contacts with Africa. Benign commerce turned however into the slave trade and at the height of the 18th century into the transportation of over 6 million Africans. The British Parliament outlawed this moral outrage in 1807 and the Dutch followed 7 years later.

    As the 19th century progressed philanthropic explorers and Christian missionaries travelled courageously through Africa, but in turn they unwittingly paved the way for the harsh incursions of rival empire builders, and at the century’s end right and wrong mingled on each side in the Boer wars and left a bitter legacy.

    And yet despite these recent wounds, former adversaries from Britain and South Africa fought side by side in two World wars, in Flanders, in East Africa, in North Africa, in Europe, on the ground and in the air. We in Britain owe those South Africans – from all the country’s main communities – a great debt of gratitude. They joined us in a common cause and they were ready to make, and did make, a common sacrifice.

    Perhaps then we should have seen hints of the future. For the magnanimous spirit which brought once sworn enemies together showed the remarkable capacity of South Africans to put deep rifts behind them.

    Between the World Wars, and afterwards, we divided again. Britain cannot escape her share of responsibility for the tragedy which followed. This notwithstanding the enlightened steps which Britons had already taken in South Africa. The Lovedale Mission in the Eastern Cape, for example, had educated such influential figures as the writer and editor John Tango Jabavu. And from 1916 the University College of Fort Hare provided a platform which was in time to launch President Mandela and many other young people on their long road to leadership.

    But on the debit side of the account, the handing over of power from Westminster was tragically followed by a long period in which the majority was disenfranchised and dispossessed. These injustices have taken the best part of a century to rectify. Harold Macmillan’s clarion call sounded a clear warning but it could not prevent the isolation which enveloped South Africa for too long.

    I have confronted history frankly and with all the easy wisdom of hindsight. Just as the people’s of South Africa have had to put a great deal of their own painful history behind them, so too have the British in Africa. Neither of us should forget, we should remember so that we can learn that we should not saddle the next generation with the mistakes and mis-deeds of forebears.

    That is what the leaders of the Government of National Unity have achieved, they have triumphed over a divided history. President Mandela was a symbol of hope during the years of apartheid. He, perhaps above all, has built on the non-racial legacy of the ANC’s founders. There are many of his colleagues – Albert Luthuli, Oliver Tambo, Robert Sobukwe, and many others – who sadly did not live to see the day of freedom. They would I believe have been proud to be here today and perhaps in the spirit of this Parliament in some fashion perhaps they are here today.

    South Africa’s useful transition owed a huge amount to Nelson Mandela’s extraordinary partnership with F W De Klerk. Without the provision and the profound courage of ex-President De Klerk I do not believe that we would have been here together in this Chamber today. He held steadfast to his course even when the odds seemed almost insuperable.

    Likewise Dr Buthelezi, now Minister for Home Affairs, has over many years played a very prominent part in South Africa’s political life. He wrote some years ago, in 1990: “There is a vastness about black politics in which the major forces of history are at work. A new South Africa will arise as blacks and whites salvage the best and jettison the worst”. As he predicted, this has happened, and in bringing the Inkatha Freedom Party into this government he took a crucial step towards that vision of a new South Africa.

    Upon the backs of many and the wisdom of a few a new South Africa has been born. Acts of reconciliation and statesmanship have made it possible to look back on apartheid, and how old and out of date it now seems. The time that Harold Macmillan longed for has come.

    He said here in Cape Town those many years ago, and again I quote: “I hope, and indeed I am confident, that in another 50 years we shall look back on the differences that exist between us now as matters of historical interest. For as time passes and one generation yields to another, human problems change and fade.”

    He was right, they have done, and now South Africa can look forward to a brighter future.

    Let me turn now to that future. It is founded on two shining assets. First parliamentary democracy and the consent of the people. For all its distinction, its ceremony and its discipline, until this year this parliament failed the ultimate test of legitimacy, the legitimacy that flows from the consent of the governed, the majority of people who fell subject to its laws had no say in choosing the law-makers. It was a parliament in Africa but not a parliament of Africa.

    Now at last all that has changed as across the world we watch in wonder at elections as moving as they were tumultuous. People who for much of their lives languished in prison across the bay now sit here in this chamber to build South Africa as duly elected representatives of the people of South Africa. More remarkably still, they have extended the hand of forgiveness and cooperation to their former captors. Here too to play their part in parliament are those who opposed the Round Table talks yet participated in the elections for the sake of a peaceful outcome to those elections, and those too deserve credit as the new age begins.

    President Mandela spoke in April of “the dream of building a greater South Africa in which South Africans of all racial groups can work together to promote a spirit of reconciliation and of nation building.” Madam Speaker, those who sit in this Parliament, and all those whom they represent, have now joined in that great task of nation building.

    The new South Africa’s second great asset is to have inherited by far the most modern and effective economy and social infrastructure in all of Africa. We British want to work with you as you develop those efforts. Like you, we want all of South Africa’s people to enjoy the fruits of success. And I say this not as a pious sentiment but because we British have a direct interest, a very great stake, in your future. We have a stake because almost a million people of British descent live in South Africa, a huge community. Our peoples are inextricably linked in all manner of public and private relationships, in business, in cultural, sporting, scientific, military, political ties and for a great many people family affections as well. These bonds are a source of pride and confidence and I am confident that they will endure.

    And Britain has a very substantial economic interest in South Africa. British investment in South Africa has an estimated market value of between 40 – 50 billion Rand, this is greater than our investment in the whole of the rest of Africa combined, it shows the depth of Britain’s national commitment to South Africa.

    For Britain, South Africa is already an export market of the same scale as India, close to the markets of Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia and Singapore.

    But this is not one-way, but two-way trade. The United Kingdom is South Africa’s second larges supplier, we are also your second largest export market.

    This is a formidable relationship, but I hope it represents no more than a beginning. The global economy today is marked by the growth and dynamism of its newcomers. South Africa has great human and national resources. The potential is there, the need is there, your people are impatient for results. Yet no government on earth, however benevolent, can develop an economy with strokes of the pen. Prudent management, alertness to the challenges of the market, the acquisition and retention of international business confidence, that global economy offering hope and progress remains one of competition and a drive for success. You have achieved an historic launch towards it and you will need to hold to that momentum over the years ahead.

    Sustaining confidence, meeting in time the high expectations of your people, will come, I firmly believe, if you follow the policies of the open society, as you have set yourself to do. Policies which emphasise the individual and private initiative, policies which reward hard work, policies which encourage free choice and discourage bureaucratic meddling. Policies of competitiveness and openness, a free press and an environment for constructive criticism. An approach that will attract hard-headed investors into South Africa to create jobs, to create prosperity, to create growth, to enable those dreams that exist within South Africa to be met within the years that lie ahead.

    That is the proven approach, the proven approach which has worked in Britain, worked in the West, increasingly in the dynamic economies of the Far East, once developing and now on their way to giant success, and is being adopted also throughout the former Communist countries of Eastern Europe.

    Madam Speaker, Britain will not stand idly by on the sidelines and wait to see how you get on. We want to take part with you in this great and exciting enterprise to the furthest extent that we are able and in all the ways that you think best.

    I want to form a fellowship between Britain and South Africa, a fellowship for the future, a fellowship for reconstruction. Through business, through investment, through development assistance we wish to support your reconstruction and development programme. The British Minister of Africa and Head of the Overseas Development Administration, Baroness Chalker, is here with me today. Over the whole of the past decade her team have been developing projects in townships and rural areas throughout South Africa, planning for South Africa’s future after apartheid. As your transition came closer they stepped up their work.

    But your needs are greater now and in the next 3 years we plan to commit a further 530 million Rand. Lynda Chalker, who I know is well known to many of you here in this Chamber today, will work with your government to channel 350 million Rand into the Reconstruction and Development Programme. The remainder will be contributed through the European Union and the Commonwealth Development Corporation, and I have brought the Chief Executive, Roy Reynolds, with me today so that he can begin to examine how best that can be done as you build the future of the new South Africa.

    And I want also to develop a dynamic partnership in trade and in investment. The Chairmen and Chief Executives of some of Britain’s largest companies have come with me to South Africa and they will be taking part in a Business Round Table in Johannesburg tomorrow. We are already big investors in each other’s country. 68 British companies have made new investments in South Africa over the past four years. The Commonwealth Development Corporation is planning a substantial programme of investment for the future. And to encourage this process, President Mandela and I signed this morning an Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement.

    There is enormous potential for direct trade, for even closer links in finance and services and for partnership between our companies in manufacturing and in exporting. Our businessmen have known one another for years and their willingness to invest is a sign of their confidence in your future.

    Take, for example, the Columbus Project, which has married British technology, engineering and finance to South African resources and manufacturing capability and will produce stainless steel largely for export. Projects like these will generate thousands of jobs in each of our countries and my ambition is to see far more of them develop in the future.

    So do not be surprised to see ever increasing numbers of British businessmen coming to South Africa. They came in July with the President of the Board of Trade, Michael Heseltine, you might just possibly have noticed he was here, people usually do. They have come with me on this occasion, they come in every day of the week under their own steam, with no pressure from governments and no incentives. They come because they wish to and because they believe in your future. They will come next year to the “Opportunity South Africa” Campaign which we are mounting in Cape Town, in Johannesburg and in Durban. And they will come with the backing of 1 billion sterling in official export credit guarantees to smooth the path to trade and increase the relationship between our two countries.

    British business is going to grow in South Africa but partnership is a two-way process. Your businessmen are equally welcome in Britain and we provide a point of entry to the huge European market. One-half of all your exports already go to Europe, well over half of them go to companies which keep their European headquarters in Britain.

    Madam Speaker, business sometimes carries an image of big business. I am not talking only of big business; I am talking of all sorts of businesses; I am talking of small business as well; I am talking of businesses of all sorts; I am talking of established businesses and the businesses that are yet to come and will be popular and successful in the future. A very important aim of our fellowship is to help to encourage small businesses, black businesses and new entrepreneurs. Tomorrow, I shall announce steps under our Soweto Skills Initiative to provide advice for small and medium-sized businesses here and training for entrepreneurs in Britain. [Applause].

    Madam Speaker, let me describe some other areas in which we wish to focus our fellowship; these include products on which President Mandela and I also signed a new Agreement this morning:

    First, fellowship in the community. This means healthcare. We shall provide training for primary healthcare managers and we shall continue our support for the healthcare programmes of the Rural Foundation and the Alexandra Health Clinic. [Applause].

    It means helping community policing. In the run-up to the elections, British police officers became familiar figures in your townships. If they are needed and if you ask for them, they will be ready to come back to help with training, recruitment and with detective work.

    It means education, this fellowship. We can promote English-language skills at university level and the teaching of mathematics, science and English in schools, we can help with basic education for adults and distance education. The British Council is eager to play a larger role in the new South Africa.

    I believe, Madam Speaker, that sport has a huge part to play in the life of a healthy community and as an outlet for the energies of young people. South Africa is one of the world’s great sporting nations; our sportsmen and sportswomen have had memorable encounters over the years; they have had memorable encounters this year on the cricket and rugby fields and at the Commonwealth Games but your sporting opportunities are not yet evenly distributed yet and we would like to help you spread them to each and every part of your community. [Applause].

    I have brought great sporting ambassadors with me. Over the next few days they will be meeting your young people and passing on their skills and most importantly their enthusiasm and I am sure that Sir Colin Cowdrey, Sir Bobby Charlton, Judy Simpson, Rob Andrew and Alec Stewart will inspire your youngsters with their love of sport and with the experiences and the worldwide friendships that it has brought to them. Their coaching sessions are a foretaste of the initiative that we are launching to train 200 sports coaches to work at both community and at national level. We shall take a special interest in the stars of your future even though I may curse the fact that we have done so when they are scoring goals or runs against us in games they play in the future!

    Second, fellowship in farming: We would like to develop sustainable farming systems for small farmers, to set up links with agricultural bodies in the United Kingdom and to work on land resettlement.

    Third, Madam Speaker, we should develop a closer fellowship in science and in technology. There are differing skills in our two scientific communities. The President of the Royal Society, Sir Michael Atiyah, and my own Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor Sir William Stewart, are with me on this visit and will be exploring grounds for closer collaboration with the scientists of South Africa. They will pave the way for a mission of British companies with technical excellence in medical research and pharmaceuticals, water treatment and food production that will be led by the British Cabinet Minister responsible for science, David Hunt, and I believe this area of cooperation can be immensely fruitful for both our nations in the years that lie ahead.

    Fourth, Madam Speaker, there should be a fellowship in public administration and between our two Parliaments. We have experience to share in the training of senior government officials at the centre and in the provinces and I hope you will agree that the members of our two Parliaments – my Parliament and your Parliament – should develop close links and should meet often to share our experiences and to plan the way ahead [Applause] with that in mind, Madam Speaker, we intend to arrange joint seminars between our Members of Parliament and yours and visits to Britain by Provincial Executive Council members.

    Fifth, Madam Speaker, a fellowship is already developing between our defence forces. Your government paid Britain a great compliment in asking us to advise on the integration of the new South African National Defence Force. You have involved us in a task which is vital to future stability and I look forward to visiting the British military assistance team on Wednesday.

    Finally, Madam Speaker, I hope that we can develop a fellowship in international affairs and within the Commonwealth. I see very little to divide us and a great deal that we will be able to do together. When your Deputy Foreign Minister visits London in a few weeks’ time, I shall propose that his talks should become the first in a regular pattern of exchanges between our two Foreign Ministries. [Applause].

    Madam Speaker, our links have deep roots in the past but what I am describing today is not about the past, it is a fellowship for the future, it is already extensive but it, too, is only a beginning. Once launched, I have not a shred of doubt that it will grow and that it will strengthen of its own accord.

    Madam Speaker, I would like for a moment to say a few words about the Commonwealth before turning to the Continent of Africa. With so many Commonwealth members in Africa, the two are of course closely linked. Apartheid, even after South Africa’s departure, struck at the very roots, the very foundations, of the modern multi-racial Commonwealth. The Commonwealth was unanimously against apartheid but deep divisions opened within it, at times they threatened the very existence of the organisation. The Commonwealth was more strongly committed to ending apartheid and very heavily preoccupied with it than any other body in the world. The emergence, therefore of the new South Africa is a particular cause for rejoicing across the Commonwealth. When Deputy President Mbeki presented your new flag to the Commonwealth Secretary-General in Westminster Abbey in July, the congregation burst into spontaneous applause; South African participation in the Commonwealth Games in Victoria was greeted with equal delight and so it was at Lords cricket ground at that memorable moment when South Africa took the field. South Africa’s re-entry to the Commonwealth, her coming home to the Commonwealth where she belongs should do more than just heal a wound, it should provide a stimulus to the Commonwealth family of one-third of the world’s nations.

    Madam Speaker, I am a dedicated believer in the Commonwealth, its values are our values, its values are your values. I hope that between us we can develop an approach to next year’s Conference in Auckland which reinforces the 1991 Declaration of Harare on good government by drawing in particular on your powerful example here in South Africa and by working together, Britain and South Africa can help to bring the very best out of this very precious and wholly unique organisation.

    Madam Speaker, let me now look northwards. The past decade has seen dramatic changes for the better in other continents and regions, dynamic economic growth across Asia, the peace process in the Middle East and in Berlin just fourteen days ago I witnessed the final act of the Cold War, the withdrawal from a once besieged city of the Allied forces which had protected it for so long.

    The end of the Cold War has given Europe the opportunity of a new age of reason, the end of apartheid has brought South Africa into an age of enlightenment. For all the traumatic conflicts and appalling humanitarian disasters which have beset Africa, I believe this Continent too has the chance of a new beginning. The last years of this century and the early years of the next century can be the prelude to a new age for Africa.

    This may strike some, the cynics who are always there, the cynics who said that this day could never have happened and that this parliament could never have met, those cynics are still out there and it may strike those cynics as false optimism to say that there can be a new age for Africa; it may for some when set against the unimaginable horrors of Rwanda or Angola, the conflict in Sudan, the devastation inflicted on millions by the unbridled violence in Somalia and in Ethiopia but think a moment! Consider this region just fifteen years ago: the bitter war in Zimbabwe sucking in the front-line state was unresolved, so was the struggle for Namibia’s independence, civil wars scarred Mozambique and Angola and you know the circumstances in your country and now after a relatively short span only Angola remains at war; there too conflict may, I hope, be moving towards an end which would unlock Angola’s huge riches.

    So how can Africa be reinvigorated? What does it need, what must be done and who can do it, who can play a role to change the life not just of a country but of a whole continent and turn the history of two centuries on its head as we look forward to a better future? What does Africa most need? Africa needs peace and peace needs a combined effort by the United Nations, by external powers with strong African interests, by the Organisation of African Unity. Too often in history, Africa’s stronger countries have been so beset by their own problems that they have been unable to give really effective help to others on their same continent. Of course, your first priority must be to achieve success within South Africa. Nevertheless, despite those immense preoccupations that you have, despite the fact that you only now together are beginning to take up that great task, you have already begun to be more active further afield in Africa. South Africa will have a powerful voice in Africa’s future councils. The whole Continent, from the furthest north right down to your own country at the south, needs a strong, a vigorous and a benign South Africa and Africa needs development. That does not just mean aid.

    Outside aid can do almost nothing without internal self-help and that surely has been one of the lessons we have learned over the last thirty years. The right conclusions are now being drawn, there is now a new mood of economic realism in many parts of Africa, market-place strategies are being adopted, difficult and painful though they may be, the courage is there and governments are beginning to adopt those strategies. No less than 29 countries in sub-Saharan Africa have chosen the hard, the difficult but the necessary and correct course of economic reform.

    Outside help can take many forms. There is of course a need and a place for development aid from multi-lateral institutions and bilaterally. My country alone provides aid to Africa worth nearly 800 million pounds each year. Debt relief is a necessity too and many African countries have benefited from the Trinidad Terms initiative which I launched through the Commonwealth Finance Ministers four years ago. But over the long term, development will come above all from trade, from investment and from infrastructure. The benefits which a free and a prosperous South Africa can bring in this way to your fellow members of the SADC are immense and they are already being felt. South Africans are trading, improving roads and air links and developing communications into the heart of Africa and some of our British companies are proud to be partnering you in that remarkable and necessary work but welcome though it is, this is just the beginning. In aid, in trade and in diplomacy, Britain would like to work closely with South Africa to turn the tide at last in this Continent in which my nation has been so deeply involved for so many years.

    Let me make to you this one final and important point. For years, more years than any of us would care to remember, our energies have been consumed in trying to limit trouble after it has started but it would be far far better – and indeed far less costly in lives and in other ways – if we were able to pre-empt that trouble before it began.

    I believe that an entirely new effort at preventive diplomacy is long overdue. With our friends in Africa and with their agreement and with their participation, Britain wants to develop new mechanisms to head off conflicts before they become unstoppable; before the bloodshed and the misery that we have seen become reality, let us see if we can head them off. We have in mind, for example, setting up regional peacekeeping cells. we need more people trained to mediate, more people trained to act as peace-brokers. We would not need a cumbersome bureaucracy – not now or in any circumstances – but a tight and properly resourced infrastructure that could best be established in Africa itself to deal with the problems that exist in Africa itself.

    These are ideas that we are developing and some of them will be put to the United Nations next week by the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary, Douglas Hurd.

    Madam Speaker, with the right backing in Africa and with the right backing that I hope and believe we will receive from the new South Africa, we believe that imaginative diplomacy of this kind can help the Continent of Africa towards that elusive new age.

    Madam Speaker, to the early seafarers from Europe, this was not the Cape of Good Hope – it was the “Cape of Storms”, that is how they knew it. In more recent times it has been a Cape of political storms whipped up by the winds of change, storms which have seen many bitter and many painful events in these parliamentary buildings, in this beautiful city, throughout a country that is uniquely blessed by nature.

    In South Africa, the storm has gone. Hope, good hope, has come back to reside in your land.

    Madam Speaker, South Africa’s new beginning is bringing new opportunities, a new fellowship, to our relations and I am delighted that next year, at your invitation, Her Majesty The Queen will pay a State Visit to South Africa just as her father did before her many years ago in 1947. [Applause].

    I believe we can truly say now that we are reunited, reunited in the Commonwealth, reunited as true democracies, reunited as trading partners and as sporting rivals, reunited in seeking solutions for all the problems of Africa and united, as we have always been, in the affection and myriad ties between our two peoples.

    Madam Speaker, South Africa has come out of the storm and into the calm, out of isolation into fellowship, out of division into unity. Now you can light the way for others. You are forging a single non-racial, democratic nation at peace with itself. That is a formidable challenge for the years ahead. You will not lack willing helpers, you will not lack friends and we in Britain will be privileged to be first among them. I am grateful for your attention. [Applause].

  • Mr Mandela’s Speech at Banquet for John Major – 20 September 1994

    Below is the text of President Nelson Mandela’s speech at the banquet held for John Major, held on Tuesday 20th September 1994.


    PRESIDENT NELSON MANDELA:

    Prime Minister John Major,

    Cabinet members and other members of your delegation,

    Madame Speaker,

    President of the Senate,

    Deputy Presidents,

    Dear Guests,

    I am deeply honoured to play host to you, Mr Prime Minister and your delegation.

    For the reasons that you so eloquently outlined in your address to parliament this morning, the United Kingdom and South Africa do have a special relationship.

    It may well be that in the centuries gone by, this was a relationship premised on the dictates of self-interest by the rich and mighty. It may well be that that relationship had its stormy moments over the decades – between our various communities and people.

    But that history has bequeathed on both our countries common attributes in more ways than one. Besides the fact that we are now communicating in one language, there are many positive traits, covering a wide range of areas – not least the system of democracy and culture of human rights – that inspired us over the years, and continue to be a source of reference even today.

    The Government of National Unity is truly appreciative that you have come to South Africa. Coming hot on the heels of the visit by the President of the Board of Trade, Michael Heseltine and indeed many engagements between our government representatives, business-people, sports personalities, cultural performers and others – your presence in South Africa crowns a partnership that we can now say has truly come of its own.

    You made detailed reference earlier today to the agreements that we have signed in many areas of common interest. We, in South Africa, and I refer here both to my Government and the people as a whole, are particularly thankful of the commitment shown by your government to help us deal comprehensively with the legacy of apartheid. We are impressed by your grasp of the difficult problems that we have to grapple with, and your generosity in making a contribution to their solution.

    In this way, Sir, Britain is asserting her role in the front ranks of nations that seek to help in consolidating our young democracy.

    We are committed to strengthening this relationship, conscious of the fact that both our nations will benefit tremendously from it. To this end, many issues have been broached during our discussions, including the meeting this afternoon with the business representatives in your delegation. On our part we shall ensure that all these matters are followed up and concluded.

    Our country has taken her rightful place within the Commonwealth of Nations. We saw it as entirely natural, that immediately after the establishment of the Government of National Unity, we should take this step. For, we are mindful of the many economic, political, cultural, sporting and other mutual benefits that will accrue from this relationship.

    We are pleased that Her Majesty, the Queen has accepted our invitation to South Africa and we are eagerly awaiting her historic visit.

    Mr Prime Minister,

    The attainment of democracy in our country has made it possible for us to forge a new partnership. In the long years of difficult endeavours to this end, we enjoyed the support of British people and various governments. Today, we meet at the beginning of a new dawn in our relations. And we are confident that these will grow from strength to strength.

    My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Please pray be up standing, for a toast to Her Majesty the Queen.

  • Mr Major’s Arrival Statement in Cape Town – 20 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s arrival statement in Cape Town, made on Tuesday 20th September 1994.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Mr Deputy President, Mr Premier, Ladies and Gentlemen. I would like to say first what a thrill it is to be here at last and how good it is to meet so many old friends. Only four years ago when I became Prime Minister, very few people would have predicted this moment, that in 1994 a British Prime Minister would set foot in a non-racial democratic South Africa. And yet it has happened. Today we stand at the dawn of a new age for South Africa, a new age when with faith and hope and courage all things are possible.

    Norma and I have long wanted to come here. We may not know South Africa but we do know South Africans. As well as you, Mr Deputy President, President Mandela, many other South Africans have been friends of ours and have visited Downing Street in recent years. These are friendships that Norma and I look forward to renewing with very great pleasure.

    Your elections earlier this year evoked admiration, emotion, excitement, thousands of miles away in Britain and across the world, they opened a huge opportunity not only for South Africa but for South Africa’s friends.

    I am not here alone today but with a large group of those friends – the Minister for Africa, Lynda Chalker, well known to many people in this country; and Tony Nelson, the Minister of State at the Treasury; with captains of industry and of finance; with the President of the Royal Society, Sir Michael Atir, one of our most eminent scientists; and with Sir Peter Newson, a leading educationalist; and I have with me also five sporting Ambassadors whose names will be familiar not only here but throughout the whole of the sports loving world, Sir Colin Cowdrey, Sir Bobby Charlton, Judy Simpson, Alex Stewart, and a recent visitor returning, Rob Andrew, whom I am sure you will remember.

    This team represents only a small cross-section of the interests which Britons and South Africans have in common.
    I have the privilege later this morning of addressing your Parliament. On that occasion I shall be able to say that we are here to make a new beginning, here to make new friends, and here because in so many areas of life Britons and South Africans have a tremendous amount to offer one another.

    For the next three days my party and I are going to spread ourselves across South Africa, we intend to make the best use of every single moment we have. There is work to be done and we long to get on with it.

    Thank you for your welcome.

  • Mr Major’s Joint Doorstep Interview with Nelson Mandela – 20 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s joint doorstep interview with Nelson Mandela, made in Cape Town on Tuesday 20th September 1994.


    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    We have signed several agreements on investment, aid and on the assistance we are getting from the British Aid Team, and it was covered a wide range of issues on which [inaudible].

    QUESTION (Mike Brunson, ITN):

    Mr President, since this is such an historic day could I invite you to recall whether you heard the original “Winds of Change” speech in 1964 and where you heard it and all that has happened since then?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    It was a very exciting speech. It was difficult at that time to comprehend the magnitude of what was going to happen in Africa and the British Prime Minister had a vision which was very altruistic and which propelled the movement for liberation all over the country, and especially in our country. And one tended to forget that in the intervening period, but now of course with the impending visit of the Prime Minister we remember that speech was a great speech indeed and I think it did a great deal to fuel the movement for liberation of the country.

    QUESTION:

    Where did you hear it yourself though?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    I was around, you have to remember that I was around for a long time…

    QUESTION (Reuters):

    Where would you like to see the British aid money spent most?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    It is not a question of where I would like to see. British aid has been well structured in various fields – education, military training, economic – and all these are very important aspects of our lives and I think British aid has been well structured.

    QUESTION:

    Could you tell us something about the agreements you signed this morning?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    We have signed a range of agreements. The one that the President did not mention was an agreement that we have signed for greater scientific cooperation. What we are effectively seeking to do is to work as well as we can with the new South Africa in terms of business, in terms of helping to redevelop and restructure the country in terms of the needs that exist, in terms of sharing the expertise that exists in the United Kingdom and exists in South Africa. We both have a great deal I think that we can gain from one another and the sum of the parts working together in many areas will be greater than the whole. So I think there is a great opportunity for us. I have brought with me on this occasion a very senior collection of businessmen, the President of the Royal Society, my own Scientific Adviser, a very senior educationalist, Sir Peter Newson, and of course some sporting Ambassadors. And I have brought them to illustrate the sheer breadth of the historical links that have existed between my country and. South Africa and as an indication of the areas in which we can develop and extend those links in the future. That is not an inclusive list but I think it is a pretty good start.

    QUESTION:

    Britain has slipped over the past years from 1st in the list of South Africa’s trading partners to 4th, would you like to see yourself back in first place, do you think you could and how could you achieve that?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I can give you some very good news this morning, since you say we are fourth, because we are back to second. So we are heading in the right direction and I have every ambition to see it improve.

    QUESTION:

    [Inaudible].

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I truly hope so.

    QUESTION:

    President Mandela, the British government in the past were not always the greatest supporters of the ANC, have you managed to put all that behind you now?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    There are two ways of looking at this problem, one superficial, and the one taking account of what goes on [indistinct] I can assure you that our struggle has been unique in that it has received support from a wide range of governments, Conservative, Liberal and radical, and I think that the support we got from the British government, to which no publicity was given, has been tremendous in ensuring that some of the democratic changes that have taken place did occur.

    QUESTION:

    [Indistinct] what were the below the surface, less superficial, measures taken by the British Government to support your cause?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    I can assure you that if I had any complaint against the British government that this would be the appropriate time to voice it, and the fact that I am doing nothing of the sort shows how grateful I am for what came to us below the surface.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I will give your questioner a practical example, if I may. Over the last 10 years or so, perhaps a practical example is actually living proof with me with Lynda Chalker behind me who has been Minister for Overseas Development for a very long time. Throughout the past decade she has been structuring assistance, structuring aid actually to help in some of the most unprivileged parts of South Africa, now that is a single illustration which many could be given and I hope it will put your mind at rest.

    QUESTION:

    President Mandela, could I ask about your relations with the [indistinct] Royal Family at this time?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    My relations with both His Majesty King [indistinct] are very good. We all face problems from the point of view of persuading our respective constituencies to work as harmoniously together as I and His Majesty and Chief Buthelezi, we are not alarmed over any developments because we believe we have the capacity to address them and to get things to move to normalcy in the near future.

    QUESTION:

    [Indistinct] will never meet Chief Buthelezi again.

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:
    I am aware of that. The [indistinct] is an event [indistinct] not on the basis of tribal affiliation but an event which should be celebrated by the whole of South Africa. My intention to take part in those celebrations was to [indistinct] to transform what is now a tribal to a national affair. But we have not done sufficient spadework to convince the people on the ground that this is how we should handle this event. But I have no doubt that we will be able to convince everybody that we should open up this event so that it should be celebrated with the dignity that it deserves.

    QUESTION:

    Prime Minister, without wanting to pre-empt your speech this morning how will you characterise what you are going to say to Parliament here today?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I reflect a little on the past, but the bulk of what I have to say about the future, about the prospects of a wholly new age for South Africa and over a longer timescale a wholly new age for the rest of Africa as well, and I will touch on practical ways in which I think that might be brought about in partnership.

    QUESTION:

    Could you very briefly sum up for us the the importance of the relationship that you believe there is between the two countries?

    PRESIDENT MANDELA:

    The [indistinct] of our relationship can never be over-emphasised. I did indicate inside here to the British Prime Minister that our relations date from times immemorial and it is our task to strengthen them. I am convinced that on both sides that there is the will and capacity to contribute towards the strengthening this relationship. It is in the interests of both countries and our respective people that that relationship should be intensified. And I think that the Head of Government was prepared to play that role.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think our relationships are sufficiently close for me simply to say that I entirely agree with what the President said, nothing more needs to be said.

  • Mr Major’s Comments on South Africa Visit – 20 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s September 1994 visit to South Africa, from his memoirs “John Major – The Autobiography”.


    SIR JOHN MAJOR:

    I visited South Africa in September 1994, five months after the first fully democratic elections in the country’s history, and addressed both Houses of Parliament. There was a limit to how much practical help Britain could give out of an overseas aid budget that is targeted at the very poorest nations, but I promised £100 million of assistance. Afterwards, at lunch – in the room in which, over thirty years earlier, Harold Macmillan had delivered his famous ‘Wind of Change’ speech – I saw something of the remarkable spirit that had taken the country into the new era. Former inmates of the notorious prison on Robben Island sat chatting with white MPs who had served in the previous National Party government.

    That trip had many memories. After addressing the Parliament I flew to Johannesburg accompanied by British sports stars Alec Stewart, Judy Simpson, Rob Andrew and Bobby Charlton. Colin Cowdrey, who had brought the South African cricket administrator (and former Test captain) Ali Bacher to see me in 1991 to seek to help readmit the South African team to international competition, was there to meet us. In Alexandria township I opened a new sports ground built with British funds whilst the British stars played pied piper to the children and began impromptu coaching sessions. In the nets, to my great satisfaction, I bowled out Steve Tshwete, the South African Sports Minister, with my first ball. It was one of the happiest of visits.

  • Mr Major’s Doorstep Interview in Jedda – 19 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s doorstep interview in Jedda, held on Monday 19th September 1994.


    QUESTION:

    Can we just ask you about developments in Haiti? You must be relieved that it is not going to be a full-scale hostile invasion.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I haven’t seen the full details of what has happened yet but as I understand it, it looks as though there may be a settlement without the need for armed force and clearly that is very welcome, I am very pleased indeed about that.

    QUESTION:

    We understand though that American troops are going in to safeguard the arrangements but there are dangers still ahead presumably?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    That is my understanding but I think that must have been agreed by negotiation between President Carter and the junta and I think that probably is the right way to proceed?

    QUESTION:

    How did your talks with the Custodian [indistinct]

    PRIME MINISTER:

    Let me firstly say that I am absolutely delighted to be back here in Saudi Arabia. There was absolutely no doubt whatever from our discussions about the warmth and the strength of the relationship between our two countries. The talks could scarcely have been better, I was delighted with them.

    QUESTION:

    Did you also discuss Iraq?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    We discussed Iraq, we discussed Iran, we discussed Yemen, we discussed a whole range of regional and international problems.

    QUESTION:

    [Inaudible]

    PRIME MINISTER:

    No, that was not a matter for discussion.

    QUESTION:

    What of the future?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I think we have strengthened a relationship that was strong before, has lasted for a long time and will endure.

  • Mr Major’s Speech in Jedda – 19 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech to British Businessmen in Jedda on Monday 19th September 1994.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    Patrick, thank you very much! I have to say to you that it says nothing about being eccentric as an expatriate but if you think being an expatriate is eccentric, how eccentric is it to cease being an expatriate and go into politics? That I must tell you is real eccentricity!

    Let me just say a few words this morning in the brief time we have got together and then I would like to leave as much of the time as we can for whatever questions you have.

    Let me say firstly I am delighted to see so many of you here this morning and delighted to be here myself. I had last evening a very lengthy audience with King Fahd following the banquet that he most generously gave in my honour and one thing strikes me always when I come back to Saudi Arabia – and it was certainly very evident in our discussions last evening – and that is the truly excellent state of relations between Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. I say that not as a matter of form but as a matter of fact. Those relations are excellent in their warmth, in their breadth, in their depth, diplomatically, politically and in terms of trade and commerce and we speak to each other, the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia, over many years as friends with common interests in the region and common interests in the world that bind us together and we share a particular concern for the continued stability of the Gulf to which we make a substantial contribution whether on the ground or in New York at the United Nations.

    More recently of course we have kept in touch on a range of matters, about events in Yemen during the civil war, so the first thing that I would like to assure you of this morning is that you will be able to continue to work here in Saudi Arabia against the background of an excellent political relationship at all levels. We are determined that that will remain the case.

    The trading relationship, you know as much as I do of that but let me simply say that the relationship between our two countries as far as trade is concerned is flourishing as never before. We export goods and services worth close to 2 billion pounds a year to Saudi Arabia, total trade is over 3 billion pounds a year; Saudi Arabia is our largest export market outside the OECD with the single exception of that rather special case of Hong Kong and what is becoming increasingly satisfactory is that this is becoming increasingly a two-way relationship. We are delighted that high-quality Saudi goods were on show last week in London at Olympia and I know that British companies are looking hard at the opportunities to invest in Saudi Arabia through joint ventures and our OFFSET programme is designed specifically to assist this. We believe that we have a great deal to offer that may assist Saudi Arabia from our experience in privatisation and I have made it clear to the Custodian that such experience as we have is available upon request to the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. On this occasion, this is all too brief a visit but I had the very clear impression that it strengthened yet further the already close bonds that exist between Britain and Saudi Arabia.

    Let me turn to a few British matters for a moment before I take questions and I would like to say just a few words about the British economy.

    There has been a continuing change for some time but I think perhaps the scale of the opportunities that lie immediately ahead of us is not wholly appreciated, I doubt yet that it is wholly appreciated domestically and certainly not internationally. Britain, I believe, is at an historic turning point. We are now standing at the threshold of an economic recovery unlike any we have seen since the Second World War and we are determined that this is going to be a recovery without inflation, a recovery that will last, a recovery for the long term, a recovery that will provide the springboard to our exporters to capture and then hold for the long term foreign markets and I say that after a careful examination of the facts and it is worth perhaps setting some of them out very briefly:

    Total national output has now risen for over two years; manufacturing output is now 4% higher than a year ago; we have the fastest-growing industrial production of all major European Union countries and the IMF, OECD and ourselves expect this happy trend to continue in 1995.

    Our export volumes are hitting record levels, they are 10% higher than a year ago and are outpacing imports. Inflation is at a low not seen for a generation and well below the average of our European Union competitors and not many of you experienced businessmen will recall that circumstance on many occasions in the past.

    Investment is up 6% higher than just a year ago; consumer demand is now growing at around 3% a year; and unemployment has just taken another big tumble – overall it is now 380,000 lower than its peak at the very end of 1992.

    They are very encouraging statistics and the whole range of them suggests that this is a broadly-based recovery that is set to last. Of course, not every statistic on every occasion is going to be a good one, that is not the way the real world works, but the overall direction is perfectly clear: Britain is securely on course for long-term economic recovery based on sustainable growth, low inflation and sound public finances and we are determined to keep it that way.

    Almost every previous economic recovery we have seen has been wrecked by overheating. We have seen it time and time again. Frustratingly, when things start to go right, they suddenly go too right too quickly and we have headed off into difficulties yet again.

    Let me say this to you quite bluntly: I am determined not to allow this recovery to be endangered in this way. We are going to take no risks whatsoever with inflation. The British public and believe British business as well require stability and predictability in their household budgets, their mortgage repayments, investment decisions and in their export pricing and it is only when they have confidence in that that they will be able to take decisions with confidence for the future and that is what we seek to instil both in the short- and the long-term and that was the reason last week that we moved to raise interest rates by one half-point. The British people and British business need to know that where the Government is concerned short-termism is not going to be an option. We are playing for the long term, long-term prosperity, long-term jobs and long-term growth.

    The current recovery – and this is a very welcome development – marked by a very strong performance by our exporters and I think this is one of the reasons why observers see this recovery as being different in kind from any that we have seen before and the Government will do whatever it can, whatever it needs to do, to ensure that this continues and to provide the conditions that will enable British enterprise to go out and beat the competition and continue to beat the competition in markets all around the world.

    That was what lay behind the Competitiveness White Paper some time ago; it is why exports play such an important part in it; it is why we will continue to look right across the range of Government activity from the more obvious areas of competitiveness to supply-side changes in education and elsewhere to ensure the long-term competitiveness of British industry in the future; it is why I brought with me on this occasion a very strong team of business leaders – we want to help them utilise the opportunities in major export markets that await an economically resurgent Britain. I am more confident that they will be able to take those opportunities than I have been for very many years and our job as Government is to try and ensure that we maintain the right economic framework, the right levels of confidence, to enable our businessmen and our industry to go out and sell the best of British in every corner of the world. I believe they will do their job providing we do ours and we are determined to do so.

    That very briefly is the view from London. It is an optimistic view but it is also the view I hear from foreign observers of the British scene, that rarely have they seen such a favourable combination of economic ingredients. I hope, therefore, that people will begin to build up the confidence that is necessary for them to go out and take advantages of the circumstances that are coming together – I am sure that they will.

  • Mr Major’s Speech at English Heritage Conference – 16 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s speech at the English Heritage Conference, held at the QEII Conference Centre in London on Friday 16th September 1994. The speech was on the subject of the National Lottery.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    THE NATIONAL LOTTERY

    I’ve always believed it to be a virtue to think long-term – and perhaps nowhere more so than in the preservation and enhancement of our Heritage.

    There’s no mystery about why there should be: a healthy society needs a positive attitude to its own past, and its own future. We have been fortunate to have had our horizons widened by the creative legacy of the past and now we must leave our legacy for the future.

    It is especially appropriate to make this point to a conference celebrating the work of English Heritage. Their mission, of preserving the best of our historic environment and enabling us to understand and enjoy it, is vitally important. Today many traditional values which held society together are being questioned. We face ever-more rapid changes to our daily lives. At times like this the history about us is reassuring: it provides a link with the past and reinforces a sense of identity.

    This is not just nostalgia. The built environment plays a big part in creating community and pride. And the growth in the membership of English Heritage, up from 80,000 members in 1986 to over 300,000 now, demonstrates that rather clearly.

    This morning, I want to pay tribute not just to English Heritage, but also to all those individuals who devote their time, their money, and their energy to conservation. Over years, the vast majority of historic buildings and monuments have been preserved by private owners. Most of them remain in private hands. The pleasure of owning historic buildings comes with an in-built duty to care for them. Around the country thousands of families take pride in fulfilling this duty.

    English Heritage and others don’t just produce social benefits. They produce significant economic benefits too. 37 per cent of overseas visitors cited historic buildings and monuments as important factors in their decision to visit Britain. Since 1982, when we published the White Paper that led to the formation of English Heritage, visits to historic properties have increased by 24 per cent. Historic buildings provide 20,000 paid jobs in the England. When you consider that the tourist industry is worth £33 billion a year, 5 per cent of our GDP, you begin to comprehend the immense value of our built heritage.

    THE LOTTERY

    But preserving it isn’t cheap. Happily, today we are on the verge of one of the most important steps forward ever in providing resources for improving our Heritage. I refer to the National Lottery which will inject substantial extra funds into the Heritage, the Arts and Sport. It will provide also a valuable new form of support for charities. And it will unleash a wave of creativity for projects to mark the Millennium. These extra funds are now perhaps only ten months away. Anyone who has ever burned with the desire to change the face of their town, their village or the whole country will have a chance do so. And I hope and believe many people will take advantage of this opportunity with enthusiasm and originality.

    Getting this far hasn’t been easy. The history of public lotteries in this country is – to be as polite as possible – colourful. The Director-General of OFLOT would have a fit if he had to investigate the standards of probity and security that obtained in Georgian and Victorian lotteries. Thankfully, times have changed – and I believe we have set up a system that is safe, fair, honest and popular.

    The resources created by the Lottery will unlock the door to a higher quality of life for millions of people, irrespective of income and without extra taxation. This is not a peripheral matter, it is central to the continued health of our society: to the successful transmission of civilised values down the generations. I am keen to ensure – as far as possible – that far more of our citizens have access to those intangible good things of life.

    The general guidelines the Government have issued make clear that the Lottery will fund mainly capital projects carrying an element of partnership funding. We have found in other fields, notably urban regeneration, that asking bidders to find private sector partners willing to put up money injects a degree of realism into ideas which make them ultimately much more successful. I hope that the attraction of partnership funding from a wide range of sources will bring the same disciplines to Lottery projects.

    The guidelines also make the important points that projects must benefit primarily the public good rather than private gain, and must be financially viable. On the Government’s side – Treasury, please note – we will make no case-by-case reductions on conventional public spending programmes to take account of awards from the Lottery. The money raised by the Lottery will not replace existing Government spending. It will enable the funding of projects which will make a lasting contribution to various aspects of our national heritage.

    So let me set out how the Lottery will help. I am sure that our hosts today, English Heritage, are not short of ideas. Let’s take the built Heritage as an example of the transformation that will take place. I have always been acutely aware that the built heritage is one of the defining characteristics of this country; as much as our fields, rivers, and landscape, our cathedrals, castles, great houses, and even commercial and domestic buildings reveal the essence of what we are.

    I believe also that my enthusiasm for the Lottery will be shared by the British people. Millions of people will participate every week. Thousands of jobs are being created. The combination of millionaire winners and huge benefits to good causes is immensely attractive. And the projected money that will be made available to the good causes is genuinely spectacular.

    The best estimate is that between this year and 2001, around £9 billion will go to the good causes: that is, over the next 6 years, roughly an extra £1.8 billion for each of five good causes;

    – the existing heritage

    – sport and arts – the living heritage

    – charities

    -and the Millennium Fund which will be both built and living heritages. These are huge sums that dwarf existing resources. I don’t believe the scale of what is likely is yet appreciated but it soon will be. And this extra funding should revolutionise provision in areas of immense importance to our quality of life.

    DISTRIBUTION

    Each of the five areas could receive £320 million a year when the Lottery is fully up and running. Let me emphasise: that money will not be under Government control. The distributing bodies will decide where the funds are spent. Departments will not have a role in assessing the individual applications for Lottery funding. On the Millennium Commission Ministers are, quite deliberately, in a minority. This independence is vital for the success of the Lottery. Each and every one of us can take pride in the visible improvements the Lottery will bring about.

    We can be genuinely excited at the sheer size of the sums that will be made available. Many in this audience will have been affected at various times by the hard pounding of the annual public spending round. I have myself at various times worn the Chief Secretary’s black hat, the spending minister’s white hat, and more recently the umpire’s white coat – and we all know that the umpire’s decision is correct – and final.

    What I have learned in every one of these positions is that the prospect of extra hundreds of millions of pounds for heritage or the arts and sport would be sheer fantasy from mainstream public spending. Whether the public finances are in surplus or in deficit there will always be pressure from the bigger programmes: from health, social security, law and order, and defence. These pressures are immense – and they invariably swamp the demands of those areas which will benefit from the Lottery, however essential many of us regard the needs of the heritage, and culture.

    I strongly believe man cannot live by GDP alone. A rounded life involves much more than economic security. A country can only be strong, healthy, and contented if it burnishes its heritage, encourages its citizens to pursue excellence in sport, and cultivates widespread appreciation of the arts. I would like to see everyone in this country share in the opportunities that were once available only to the privileged few.

    That means not just jobs, decent healthcare, and a good education, but other less tangible advantages. The chance to appreciate great art or great music, even if it is not part of the normal background to your early life. The ability to absorb the living history of our great buildings, and the poetry of the many British landscapes. The opportunity to test your physical abilities to the limit through sport. And the chance to contribute to the wider community through voluntary and charitable work. I am determined that the Lottery will make it possible for millions more to enjoy a fuller life.

    It was in that spirit that I set up the Department of National Heritage. Its creation was a sign that Government should take such activities seriously. For millions of people, they are not optional extras, they are worth valuing in their own right. DNH is, I believe, more than a Ministry of Culture, more than a Ministry of Fun. It is a permanent statement that Government regards the activities which people choose to do as highly as those which they have to do. In as much as Government can help, and that itself is a source of fruitful debate, Government will help.

    HOW THE GOOD CAUSES WILL BE TRANSFORMED

    The arrival of the Lottery is a sign that I wish to ensure that Britain’s artists and sports men and sportswomen don’t suffer second class facilities. There will always be a place for brilliant work done on a shoe-string. But the Lottery will mean that it is less likely that this will be the only option, or even the most likely option.

    English Heritage, and many other bodies, already do a magnificent job in preserving the best of the past for future generations, and ensuring that contemporary building will also leave a positive mark. The extra funds that will flow from the Lottery will enable such bodies to extend dramatically the range and effectiveness of their work. For instance, the Brighton West Pier is entirely beyond the existing EH budget, but could be the type of project which attracts Lottery Funds. Completing the restoration of the Crescent in Buxton could be an ideal example of public/private co-operation. All these choices are not for me – how and whether to apply for funding is for English Heritage. It will be a great challenge for Jocelyn Stevens and his colleagues. But I know it is a challenge which they are delighted to meet.

    MILLENNIUM COMMISSION

    The heritage will undoubtedly have an important contribution to make to the Millennium celebrations. And so far, in discussions of the Lottery, many people have focused on the work of the Millennium Commission. Those of us who regard it as part of our job to receive helpful, if unsolicited, advice from all sides are developing a degree of sympathy with the Commissioners. Never have so many advised so few about so much. And it will get worse. But since the Commission is a fiercely independent body, and will remain so, I do not regard myself as in any way disqualified from adding to their burden.

    Marking the Millennium in an appropriate way is a difficult enough task, not least because none of us has had much practice. The ecclesiastical historians tell us that at the end of the first Millennium people all over Europe abandoned their homes in terror and ran into the fields, thinking it was the end of the world. At least the Millennium Commission has not provoked that sort of response – yet. Although, these days I suppose, anything is possible.

    What it has provoked is an enormous outpouring of ideas from all areas. Opera houses, art galleries, sports facilities, exhibition centres, computer networks; all have their advocates, and all, no doubt, have an excellent case. What I would like to do today is to appeal for a national outbreak of lateral thinking. As well as conventional ideas I hope that we can come up with some unusual and original projects which are worthy of Millennium Funding. Potential applicants should range widely in their thinking. Perhaps we should be considering engineering and construction projects, or ways to help the environment and wildlife.

    Applicants can also draw inspiration from similar projects in the past. Many have marvelled at the Eiffel Tower and the Sydney Opera House, and the pavilion created for the Seville Expo.

    In our own country, we can draw inspiration from the great cathedrals, and public buildings such as the Houses of Parliament and the Inns of Court. We created the Crystal Palace in a previous outburst of celebration. Our best architects have always found commissions across the board. The great Victorian pavilion at Lords was designed by the same architect who designed the Criterion Theatre. This summer, the new opera house at

    Glyndebourne was unveiled – designed by the same architects who gave us the Mound Stand at Lords. I can’t think why these cricketing comparisons come so easily to me.

    These combinations of the best of our built heritage with some of the best of our living heritage illustrate that heritage isn’t a backward-looking concept. We are constantly creating tomorrow’s heritage, and we must always be aware of the permanent effects of our daily decisions. Clearing a pond, creating a bird sanctuary, improving and opening up a garden: all of these will provide enjoyment for future generations.

    So for the Millennium Fund we might also consider projects with a humanitarian aim – or what about the provision of new technology in local communities? Every village hall with its own computers. There could be educational projects. Now is the time to let all our imaginations run free.

    MILLENNIUM BURSARIES

    One area where many individuals will have imaginative proposals is for bursaries. I am delighted that the Millennium Commission is considering the scope of a Millennium Bursaries Scheme. This could involve the spending of some tens of millions of pounds. I can’t emphasise too strongly how important this idea will be in spreading the benefits of the Lottery, and engaging individuals in the whole Millennium project. The bursaries will be a means of fulfilling personal aspirations for the future and broadening the body of knowledge we carry forward to the 21st century. They can be educational in the broadest sense, perhaps including research projects to act as exemplars in the scientific or environmental fields. New ideas could be developed which could act as a model for others to take forward. Chairs could be endowed at universities in subject areas which will contribute to the quality of life for everyone in the third Millennium. The bursaries could encourage voluntary activity, or could release individual talent and expertise to the benefit of the wider community.

    Perhaps some bursaries could allow training in unusual skills and crafts which could be passed on to others. They should not be restricted to any age group; I am sure the elderly will have as much to gain, and as much to contribute, as the young. I know the Commission will be considering how to reflect the millennial factor in the awards they make, and are looking to make a lasting contribution to learning, participation or enlightenment. This is one of their many vital tasks, and I wish them well in it.

    LOCAL MILLENNIUM PROJECTS

    The Commission is also thinking of spending more than £500 million, on current projections, to support projects which will be of specific local benefit. These projects will give the opportunity to develop partnership contributions in kind, with whole communities contributing time, energy and resources in support of millennium proposals.

    Some of these may be one-off capital schemes, or Millennium initiatives with a universal theme, such as the “greening of Britain”. They include aspects of urban renewal, such as proposals to transform city centres into public spaces where people can easily meet, shop, eat and drink, and participate in cultural and sporting activities. Attention could also be paid to the rural environment through projects to protect or improve different types of landscape in which wildlife can flourish.

    Again, the only limits are those imposed by our own imaginations. A new village hall or playing field can be as vital a signal of national revival as world class cultural centres in big metropolitan areas. With the Lottery, we can aspire to both.

    CONCLUSION

    I am determined, as I am sure all of you are, to eradicate the lingering feeling that we are continually falling behind. It has become part of conventional wisdom that after great and heroic efforts in the Second World War Britain was exhausted and unable to keep up. This has always been a simplistic and in some areas simply wrong-headed view. Our cultural activities in many areas are world class. London serves theatre and concert goers better than any other city in the world. No other country can aspire to the glories of our buildings. The honourable tradition of private sponsorship, made famous by Soane and Tate, has continued through the names of Clore and Sainsbury. Who else has festivals as good as the Proms, or Edinburgh? Who else has a broadcaster with the range and worldwide respect of the BBC?

    My message today is that we can make things even better. The Lottery gives us the biggest chance anyone has ever had of making a significant, permanent difference. I am sure that this is a vision which will stir the hearts of many, whatever their background, age, or interests. Every man and woman in this country can be a direct beneficiary. Not just the great and the good. There will be local transformations, as well as international prestige projects. Your own particular field of the Heritage will be just one of the good causes which will find its funding completely transformed. We are at the beginning of a period which can be uniquely exciting for all those of us who care deeply about the long-term quality of life in this country. I hope the whole British people will share in the excitement, and the ultimate benefits, which the Lottery will bring. I know that you in English Heritage will play a full part in making sure this happens.

  • Mr Major’s Speech at English Heritage Conference – 16 September 1994

    Below is the text of the press release following Mr Major’s speech at the English Heritage Conference, held at the QEII Conference Centre in London on Friday 16th September 1994. The speech was on the subject of the National Lottery.


    PRIME MINISTER:

    THE NATIONAL LOTTERY

    In a speech opening the English Heritage Conference, the Prime Minister set out how hundreds of millions of pounds from the National Lottery would go to good causes, which would transform for the better the face of the nation and the lives of countless people.

    The National Lottery

    The Prime Minister said that “Happily we are on the verge of one of the most important steps forward ever in providing resources for improving our Heritage. I refer to the National Lottery which will inject significant extra funds into the Heritage, the Arts and Sport. It will provide also a valuable new form of support for charities. And it will unleash a wave of creativity for projects to mark the Millennium. These funds are now perhaps only ten months away.”

    “The resources created by the Lottery will unlock the door to a higher quality of life for millions of people, irrespective of income and without extra taxation.”

    The Prime Minister explained that “the Lottery will fund mainly capital projects carrying an element of partnership funding … projects must benefit primarily the public good rather than private gain, and must be financially viable. On the Government’s side – Treasury, please note – we will make no case-by-case reductions on conventional public spending programmes to take account of awards from the Lottery. The money raised by the Lottery will not replace existing Government spending.”

    The Prime Minister believed that his enthusiasm for the Lottery would be shared by the British people. “Millions of people will participate every week. Thousands of jobs are being created. The combination of millionaire winners and huge benefits to good causes is immensely attractive. And the projected money that will be made available to the good causes is genuinely spectacular.”

    “The best estimate is that between this year and 2001, around £9 billion will go to the good causes: that is, over the next 6 years, roughly an extra £1.8 billion for each of the five good causes –

    – the existing heritage

    – sport and arts

    – the living heritage

    – charities

    and the Millennium Fund, which will be both built and living heritages.”

    “Each of the five areas could receive £320 million a year when the Lottery is fully up and running. Let me emphasise: that money will not be under Government control. The distributing bodies will decide where the funds are spent. Departments will not have a role in assessing the individual applications for Lottery funding. On the Millennium Commission, Ministers are, quite deliberately, in a minority. This independence is vital for the success of the Lottery. Each and every one of us can take pride in the visible improvements the Lottery will bring about.”

    The Prime Minister continued that “I strongly believe man cannot live by GDP alone … I would like to see everyone in this country share in the opportunities that were once available only to the privileged few … I am determined that the Lottery will make it possible for millions more to enjoy a fuller life.”

    Millennium Commission

    The Prime Minister said that, to mark the Millennium, the Millennium Commission had received “an enormous outpouring of ideas from all areas. Opera houses, art galleries, sports facilities, exhibition centres, computer networks; all have their advocates … I hope that we can come up with some unusual and original projects … Potential applicants should range as widely in their thinking. Perhaps we should be considering engineering and construction projects, or ways to help the environment and wildlife … We might also consider projects with a humanitarian aim or what about the provision of new technology in local communities? Every village hall could have its own computers. There could be educational projects. Now is the time to let all our imaginations run free.”

    Millennium Bursaries

    “I am delighted that the Millennium Commission is considering the scope of a Millennium Bursaries Scheme. This could involve the spending of some tens of millions of pounds. I cannot emphasise too strongly how important this idea will be in spreading the benefits of the Lottery, and engaging individuals in the whole Millennium project. The bursaries will be a means of fulfilling personal aspirations for the future and broadening the body of knowledge we carry forward to the 21st century. They can be educational in the broadest sense, perhaps including research projects to act as exemplars in the scientific or environmental fields. New ideas could be developed which could act as a model for others to take forward. Chairs could be endowed at universities in subject areas which will contribute to the quality of life for everyone in the third Millennium.”

    Local Millennium Projects

    “The Commission is also thinking of spending more than £500 million, on current projections, to support projects which will be of specific local benefit. These projects will give the opportunity to develop partnership contributions in kind, with whole communities contributing time, energy and resources in support of Millennium proposals.”

    “Again, the only limits are those imposed by our own imaginations. A new village hall or playing field can be as vital a signal of national renewal as world class cultural centres in big metropolitan areas. With the Lottery, we can aspire to both.”

    Conclusion

    The Prime Minister concluded by saying that “the Lottery gives us the biggest chance anyone has ever had of making a significant permanent difference. I am sure that this is a vision which will stir the hearts of many, whatever their background, age, or interests. Every man and woman in this country can be a direct beneficiary. Not just the great and the good … We are at the beginning of a period which can be uniquely exciting for all those of us who care deeply about the long-term quality of life in this country. I hope the whole British people will share in the excitement, and the ultimate benefits, which the Lottery will bring.”

     

    Notes to Editors

    1. The Director General of the National Lottery announced on 25 May that the Camelot Group plc had been selected to run the National Lottery. Camelot aim to launch the National Lottery in November. With an estimated annual turnover rising to £5.5 billion, the National Lottery is set to become the biggest lottery in the world.
    2. Net proceeds from the Lottery will be distributed equally among the arts, sport, the national heritage, charities and the Millennium Fund. In its peak year, the lottery is expected to raise £1.6 billion for these good causes – £320 million each. Over the seven years of the licence, Camelot estimate that £9 billion will be raised for the five good causes.
    3. The money for the good causes will be directed primarily at capital projects which have an element of partnership funding and where all associated short term revenue costs are covered. Projects should also be for the public good rather than primarily private gain.
    4. The Millennium Fund will finance major projects to mark the year 2000 and the beginning of the new Millennium. The members of the Millennium Commission, who will decide which projects to finance, are:

    The Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell MP – Chairman Professor Heather Couper FRAS

    The Earl of Dalkeith DL

    The Hon. Robin Dixon CBE

    Sir John Hall

    The Rt Hon Michael Heseltine MP

    Simon Jenkins Esq

    Michael Montague Esq CBE

    Miss Patricia Scotland QC

  • Mr Major’s Joint Doorstep Interview with Jacques Santer – 14 September 1994

    Below is the text of Mr Major’s joint doorstep interview with the European Commission President-Designate, Jacques Santer, in London on Wednesday 14th September 1994.


    JACQUES SANTER:

    I was very pleased in my function as designate-president of the Commission of the European Union to see the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, John Major, on my trip through the capitals, coming from Dublin; before I was in Madrid, Rome and Lisbon and we had very good talks about the constitution of the Commission and we had also the opportunity to discuss some common subjects about the forthcoming European Union, about the procedures and the institution of procedures and also the intergovernmental conference of 1996 and so on. We had a very constructive and for me at least a very useful discussion and in my view it is very important that as the upcoming President of the Commission I hear all the opinions of the members of the European Council.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    There is very little, frankly, to add to that. I have been delighted to welcome the President here today. As he said, we have ranged fairly widely, looking at what might be in the IGC, very much in its preliminary stages of course at the moment; to look at the way in which we think Europe might develop to the east; to discuss the composition of the European Commission; and to look at a number of matters related to common foreign and security policy and defence policy in the future so I think it has been a very fruitful discussion and we have agreed that we will meet at regular intervals to continue it.

    QUESTION:

    Mr. President, you are taking over at a time when there is a debate going on about the future structure of the Union. Do you see a future for a Union which has a hard core in the centre, what some people see as a two-tier Union?

    M. SANTER:

    I am very fond of all the discussions you can have about the future of Europe. I think that everybody can bring in a paper and we have to discuss it. I think that is very useful also that we have to discuss it in the future.

    As the forthcoming President for the European Commission, I cannot deal at this moment with all the papers coming up and with all the Opinions made by the European Union but I think as we made it up also for the Treaty of Maastricht and for the Treaty of the European Union we have to reach the objectives and to be a Union of 12 member states and we have to reach this objective of 12 and even the intergovernmental conference of 1996 has to reach agreement at 12 or 16; after the referenda in some of the Scandinavian countries, we have to reach 12 or 16 member states so we try and I am trying as forthcoming President of the Commission to reach agreement by all the member states. I think it is very important that all the member states can reach the targets, the objectives, that we have been trying to.

    QUESTION:

    Is it your personal view that one of those objectives should be and will be a single currency for Europe?

    M. SANTER:

    I think we reached an agreement about economic and monetary union, Inside the Treaty of Maastricht we made the steps and the stages and of course also established the criteria that each country has to reach before they could pass to the third stage and in this view I think the Treaty of Maastricht would be operational in itself. It is not my opinion to change the Treaty of Maastricht belonging to the economic and monetary union.

    QUESTION:

    But you would support the objective in that treaty of a single currency?

    M. SANTER:

    Of course.

    QUESTION:

    Prime Minister, do you believe that the IGC in 1996 will be the be-all and end-all of this debate or is it just a staging post along the way?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I don’t think the IGC of 1996 has anything to do with a single currency and I will be very surprised indeed if a single currency is part of the debate in 1996. That debate was had at Maastricht, a view was expressed by various people, we have expressed our view and at some stage in the future people will make a judgement about whether that can proceed or not but that is not a matter that is going to be particularly on the table in 1996. Many people misunderstand that but I don’t think that is going to be materially on the table then. What people are going to be at are other institutional matters and the development of course of the Community to the east, the enlargement of the development and what that means for the institutions of the Community, that perhaps and the development of common foreign and security policy and defence.

    QUESTION:

    And on the issue of a hard core which has been raised in Germany?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    You know my view about the issue of a hard core. It depends what you mean by the issue of a hard core. If you mean the issue of a hard core that lays down precisely how the rest of the Community go, goes there and expects the rest of the Community to follow it, then I think that will be destructive and I set out my views on that very clearly at Leiden a few days ago.

    QUESTION (Hugh Pym – ITN):

    If I could switch to a more domestic matter, the unemployment and inflation figures this morning, do you feel they might suggest that the interest rate rise on Monday was unnecessary?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    No, I don’t think that. I was delighted to see the further fall in unemployment; it has been falling for a long time; we are down now to 9.2%, that is far higher than I would like to see it but there has been a very great improvement and I think people are very pleased about that but one of the things to sustain employment in the future is to ensure that we have low inflation in the future, one of the things that will make us competitive with other countries not just in Europe and elsewhere is to make sure our inflation is as low as theirs.

    What concerns me and has concerned the Chancellor is that over many years in the post-War period inflation has gone down but it hasn’t been held down, it has gone down and it has gone up. What we are determined to do in the interests of keeping people in jobs, keeping Britain competitive is to make sure that we keep inflation within our target range of between 1 and 4% and round about the middle and lower half of that by the end of this Parliament so we are looking at the pressures that might emerge in the future and taking action to ensure that those pressures don’t damage people’s jobs and people’s prosperity.

    QUESTION:

    And would you agree if necessary interest rates would have to go up?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I am never going to speculate on which direction interest rates may go. It isn’t a one-way stream ever, you have to look at the conditions that apply and see what monetary policy is appropriate to contain inflation. We are serious about making sure we keep inflation under control. I have never made any secret about my passionate belief that we have to do that if we are to make sure that our economy progressively gets stronger and people’s employment gets progressively more secure and towards the end of last week the decision was made that it would be appropriate to have a small change at the moment.

    QUESTION:

    On one other subject, in a court case today, the Rachel Nickell case, there have been severe criticisms of the police handling because the accused has been allowed to walk free. Do you have any view on that?

    PRIME MINISTER:

    I haven’t seen the reports yet, I may comment when I have seen them.

    QUESTION:

    Prime Minister, can I ask you very briefly about Ireland? There is criticism today from the Republican prisoners who are suggesting that perhaps you and the British Government are dragging your feet over the IRA ceasefire.

    PRIME MINISTER:

    The IRA were conducting intolerable outrages for twenty-five years. I hope they have now given up those outrages for good, they certainly seem to be indicating that, they haven’t expressly yet said so, I hope they will expressly say so but we have made a great deal of progress. The Downing Street Declaration isolated the IRA, it isolated them in the opinion of the world and in the opinion of many other people and it has brought them to the position of a ceasefire. I hope we can build on that but we will build on that in a way that will be secure and I will do that at the time I think it is appropriate.